✪ Marchello Wolf

✪ Marchello Wolf — CS2 Stats

HU76561198980191411[U:1:1019925683]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

350Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,291Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,140Blue band · top ~48.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 11,140 → 11,140
+3Tracked matches · now 350
+3.3ppWin rate · 43.3% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,140 -285 23 Jul – 3 Nov · 22 days played
10,38113,182peak 13,18223 Jul3 Nov
13,182Peak Premier in tracked matches
51Days played since 2026-07-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,042 below peak (13,182)
  • +575 over 30 days · improving
  • -1,715 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,860 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-11-03
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-11-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate45.0%43.8%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy12.6%12.0%12.4%meets
Kill/death ratio1.031.021.03meets
Match win rate44.8%44.7%45.2%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 6 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ Marchello WolfFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER11,140 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning64
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateWLWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 442ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility4.9
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning6.4
Utility4.9
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time525ms−84ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–2 · vertigo, 18 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · cache, 20 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 16–14 · nuke, 23 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 10mirageWeakest map · 46% over 46
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB4621–2546%-0.01
infernoB2312–1152%-0.02
nukeS108–280%-0.02
ancientS64–267%-0.05
cacheB63–350%-0.01
dust2—43–175%-0.01
anubis—22–0100%-0.02
office—10–10%-0.04
vertigo—11–0100%0.16
poseidon—11–0100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 46). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

48,257Lifetime kills
1.03K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,491Matches
44.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
45.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
12.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
8,732MVPs
837Hours (in match)
1,572Bombs planted
1,587Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,987
AWP8,794
SSG 081,538
Knife1,026
MP9985

Lifetime map wins

3,856inferno
3,496dust2
1,109vertigo
843nuke
521cbble
488train
114lake
84office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

57Matches
53%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
66.4ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2846%0.8513.9
Inferno862%0.7813.1
Ancient757%0.569.1
Dust2667%0.9615.3
Nuke540%0.8312.4
Anubis367%0.9014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
528msReaction time
54.4%T opening success
55.1%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
10.05HE damage / grenade
8.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 46 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–140.0323%4 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.0113%3 Nov →
mirage13–100.0825%3 Nov →
ancient13–9-0.0314%3 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0519%2 Nov →
dust29–13-0.0128%2 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0611%1 Nov →
ancient11–13-0.098%30 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0424%30 Oct →
dust219–150.0116%30 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0014%27 Oct →
mirage13–110.0426%26 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0323%25 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0024%23 Oct →
office10–13-0.0412%22 Oct →
dust213–100.0119%22 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0522%22 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0116%22 Oct →
mirage13–110.0221%21 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0218%21 Oct →
cache13–90.0422%17 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0124%16 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0013%16 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0215%15 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0619%14 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0323%13 Oct →
inferno13–40.0220%13 Oct →
nuke13–30.0027%11 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.078%9 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0221%6 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0124%5 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0123%4 Oct →
ancient16–12-0.1212%24 Sept →
mirage15–19-0.0420%19 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0324%18 Sept →
inferno9–50.0718%18 Sept →
vertigo9–20.1625%18 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.1311%18 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0330%18 Sept →
mirage12–20.1018%18 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0424%17 Sept →
mirage13–30.0319%17 Sept →
mirage13–10.1019%16 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.028%16 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0612%13 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0137%13 Sept →
poseidon9–40.1014%13 Sept →
inferno9–40.1012%13 Sept →
mirage22–25-0.0519%6 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0511%6 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0221%6 Sept →
inferno16–120.0312%5 Sept →
ancient13–50.0130%5 Sept →
inferno13–100.0021%5 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0727%4 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0521%4 Sept →
mirage7–130.0130%31 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.008%31 Aug →
nuke9–60.0432%27 Aug →
inferno4–9-0.0427%27 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0431%26 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0121%26 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0218%25 Aug →
mirage8–130.0224%25 Aug →
mirage13–70.0116%25 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0417%23 Aug →
mirage13–70.0134%23 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0510%23 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0414%21 Aug →
mirage13–40.0223%8 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.059%8 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0127%7 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0339%6 Aug →
mirage13–40.0434%6 Aug →
nuke13–100.0127%5 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0221%5 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0013%5 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0716%5 Aug →
mirage13–60.0221%4 Aug →
mirage16–12-0.0210%4 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.1416%2 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0514%1 Aug →
mirage13–80.0423%1 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0635%27 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.050%26 Jul →
mirage11–130.0137%25 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0326%25 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0611%23 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0713%23 Jul →
inferno13–50.0513%22 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0811%21 Jul →
mirage13–30.1221%21 Jul →
inferno1–8-0.020%21 Jul →
cache13–4-0.0122%20 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0410%20 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0825%20 Jul →
cache13–110.0540%20 Jul →
inferno15–15-0.0816%20 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0215%18 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0714%18 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.