bbtz-

bbtz- — CS2 Stats

JP76561198978353855[U:1:1018088127]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,131Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,698Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,091 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,131 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 69 days played since 19 Apr 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,091 +0 31 Aug12 Sept · 2 observations
1,0911,091peak 1,09131 Aug12 Sept
1,091Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
69Days played since 2023-04-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,091
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 110 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-31

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 12 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 12 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.8%43.8%44.9%meets
Shot accuracy14.9%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.831.021.040.20 short
Match win rate43.8%44.7%45.3%1.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbbtz-FACEITLevel 5 · 1,091 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,091csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning30
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47494Last 10047%Win rateLWLLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · +24ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 712ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 754ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 742ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility4.8
Positioning3.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 15% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 732ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning3.0
Utility4.8
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact6.1

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time736ms+48ms
first ⅓ avg 688ms → last ⅓ avg 736ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+5.5%
first ⅓ avg 12.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 11 Feb
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–1 · ancient, 9 Oct
484msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 17 Feb
16–3Biggest win · inferno, 27 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
40Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 59% over 29mirageWeakest map · 38% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A29171259%-0.01
mirageC26101638%-0.03
infernoB158753%-0.02
ancientA95456%-0.03
nuke41325%-0.12
overpass42250%-0.04
anubis31233%-0.03
vertigo31233%-0.07
cache2020%-0.05
train21150%-0.03
agency21150%-0.05
rooftop1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

68,679Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
3,399Matches
43.8%Match win rate
44.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
14.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
8,221MVPs
1,698Hours (in match)
2,604Bombs planted
576Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,939
AWP9,834
FAMAS1,689
Knife1,627
MAC-101,430

Lifetime map wins

11,487dust2
4,643inferno
1,146nuke
1,109train
960vertigo
223cbble
71office
43bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,218Matches
49%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
64.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust221451%0.8412.6
Mirage18454%0.8412.4
Ancient7239%0.7811.3
Anubis4547%0.8914.0
Inferno4050%0.8513.6
Overpass2850%0.8311.6
Nuke2236%0.8612.4
Train1060%0.7712.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
71.8%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
732msReaction time
15.2%T opening success
36.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
8.01HE damage / grenade
9.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 732.1309ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.2235% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–16-0.0216%15 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0218%10 Jun
ancient11–130.0213%4 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0611%31 May
cache14–16-0.056%22 May
mirage13–16-0.0329%20 May
cache5–13-0.0524%11 May
anubis2–13-0.0415%26 Apr
anubis13–40.0017%18 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0915%18 Apr
dust211–13-0.0826%12 Apr
dust213–60.0012%12 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0614%26 Mar
mirage16–130.0414%14 Mar
mirage13–20.005%12 Mar
dust213–11-0.0132%11 Mar
dust213–11-0.0616%11 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0610%10 Mar
dust213–7-0.0317%9 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0718%8 Mar
dust213–11-0.0833%4 Mar
mirage13–30.0610%21 Feb
nuke13–3-0.0516%21 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0518%20 Feb
dust213–40.0016%20 Feb
dust22–7-0.0116%19 Feb
inferno3–90.0230%18 Feb
ancient13–6-0.0014%17 Feb
dust213–10.1025%11 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0219%6 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0438%6 Feb
dust27–130.0517%5 Feb
mirage3–13-0.076%31 Jan
dust223–25-0.0420%25 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0813%24 Jan
rooftop8–8-0.0117%13 Jan
inferno9–40.0831%13 Jan
train7–13-0.0227%6 Jan
dust213–4-0.079%22 Dec
train13–11-0.036%18 Dec
mirage3–13-0.0228%10 Dec
dust210–13-0.0420%6 Dec
mirage13–60.0821%1 Dec
dust212–12-0.0323%19 Nov
ancient8–13-0.074%30 Aug
mirage8–130.0514%26 Aug
dust213–40.0317%22 Aug
dust213–110.0011%29 Jul
ancient13–2-0.024%19 Jul
overpass13–7-0.0419%19 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0610%2 Jul
dust28–10.0127%16 Jun
dust213–110.0119%16 Jun
agency13–4-0.0021%11 Jun
agency5–13-0.0922%11 Jun
dust213–10-0.0315%22 May
overpass5–9-0.0511%21 May
nuke2–9-0.240%21 May
dust27–130.0118%19 May
nuke6–9-0.129%19 May
inferno8–8-0.043%19 May
dust212–12-0.0618%12 Dec
mirage16–13-0.0118%9 Oct
ancient4–1-0.0450%9 Oct
dust28–13-0.0628%6 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0919%6 Dec
inferno9–160.0221%25 Aug
overpass19–17-0.0415%25 Aug
mirage9–16-0.108%5 Aug
inferno16–10-0.028%2 Aug
vertigo16–8-0.024%2 Aug
vertigo9–16-0.0616%2 Aug
mirage12–16-0.1010%6 Jun
mirage10–16-0.0814%4 Jun
vertigo14–16-0.1314%27 May
inferno16–3-0.003%27 May
inferno8–16-0.0813%18 May
overpass11–16-0.0410%17 May
mirage16–19-0.0114%14 May
inferno16–8-0.068%12 May
dust216–10-0.0227%12 May
nuke12–16-0.0822%12 May
dust25–16-0.0110%12 May
mirage6–16-0.144%10 May
dust216–70.0316%10 May
mirage3–16-0.1215%29 Apr
inferno4–16-0.0611%25 Apr
mirage16–8-0.0115%25 Apr
dust216–19-0.0115%23 Apr
inferno16–12-0.0312%23 Apr
mirage16–13-0.012%23 Apr
inferno16–13-0.065%23 Apr
mirage16–12-0.0412%23 Apr
inferno16–8-0.0220%22 Apr
dust216–80.047%22 Apr
ancient16–19-0.0413%22 Apr
dust25–160.0420%21 Apr
dust216–14-0.078%21 Apr
inferno16–70.0220%21 Apr
inferno6–16-0.0315%19 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →