Tom perlฤƒ ๐Ÿ—ฟ

Tom perlฤƒ ๐Ÿ—ฟ โ€” CS2 Stats

HR76561199023413735[U:1:1063148007]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

682Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,082Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 ยท 1,226 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then โ€” still 682 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 55 days played since 28 May 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking โ†’

Rating over time

1,226Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
55Days played since 2023-05-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak โ€” 1,226
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 โ€” 125 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 ยท Level 5 ยท Level 4 ยท Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-14

CSDBโ€™s own observations โ€” this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate50.6%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy18.0%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.211.061.07above
Match win rate51.9%46.3%46.9%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 9 player. Rank still comes from winning matches โ€” this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTom perlฤƒ ๐Ÿ—ฟFACEITLevel 8 ยท 1,226 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,226csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning59
Utility35

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53โ€“46โ€“1Last 10053%Win rateLLLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’20pp win rate ยท โˆ’0.00 avg rating ยท +2.2pp headshot accuracy ยท +41ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp).

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1โ€“4 ยท 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 5โ€“5 ยท 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 20

  • 12โ€“8 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility3.5
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game โ€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.9
Utility3.5
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first โ…“ avg -0.01 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.01
Reaction time624ms+36ms
first โ…“ avg 588ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+4.6%
first โ…“ avg 18.5% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating ยท 11โ€“13 ยท dust2, 24 May โ†’
45%Best headshot accuracy ยท 8โ€“8 ยท inferno, 21 Nov โ†’
438msFastest reaction time ยท 16โ€“14 ยท inferno, 9 Jun โ†’
16โ€“2Biggest win ยท dust2, 11 Jun โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
10โ€“13In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
71Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map ยท 75% over 8mirageWeakest map ยท 30% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2817โ€“1161%0.01
mirageD206โ€“1430%-0.01
dust2B1910โ€“953%0.01
vertigoS1410โ€“471%0.00
ancientS86โ€“275%0.00
overpassโ€”41โ€“325%-0.03
anubisโ€”31โ€“233%-0.00
trainโ€”21โ€“150%-0.05
cacheโ€”10โ€“10%0.01
nukeโ€”11โ€“0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

77,881Lifetime kills
1.21K/D ยท Top 25% of Level 8 players
2,348Matches
51.9%Match win rate ยท Top 25% of Level 8 players
50.6%Headshot % ยท Top 50% of Level 8 players
18.0%Shot accuracy ยท Top 10% of Level 8 players
11,191MVPs
1,082Hours (in match)
2,239Bombs planted
517Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,230
AWP15,579
SG 5534,154
P902,698
MP91,404

Lifetime map wins

4,662dust2
4,416inferno
2,405train
1,830vertigo
822nuke
117cbble
116office
108italy

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

563Matches
53%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
84.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12058%1.2118.5
Dust210254%1.1517.3
Ancient3644%1.0716.3
Inferno2255%1.0817.6
Anubis2040%1.0618.0
Overpass1844%1.1617.3
Nuke944%1.0217.4
Train560%0.7113.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
79.0%Counter-strafing
9.5ยฐPreaim
620msReaction time
40.8%T opening success
55.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
7.19HE damage / grenade
5.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 20 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy โ†’Mirage grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5โ€“13-0.0625%31 May โ†’
dust211โ€“130.1221%24 May โ†’
overpass2โ€“13-0.1018%23 May โ†’
cache14โ€“160.0120%22 May โ†’
ancient13โ€“5-0.0418%25 Apr โ†’
anubis13โ€“40.1030%18 Apr โ†’
mirage10โ€“130.0317%18 Apr โ†’
inferno9โ€“60.0739%27 Mar โ†’
ancient16โ€“120.0916%26 Mar โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.0737%26 Mar โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.0120%19 Mar โ†’
mirage19โ€“170.0622%15 Mar โ†’
mirage16โ€“130.0720%14 Mar โ†’
mirage6โ€“13-0.0729%13 Mar โ†’
dust213โ€“70.0128%9 Mar โ†’
inferno11โ€“130.0618%8 Mar โ†’
nuke13โ€“30.057%21 Feb โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0219%20 Feb โ†’
dust213โ€“40.0824%20 Feb โ†’
ancient13โ€“60.0833%17 Feb โ†’
ancient13โ€“9-0.0115%6 Feb โ†’
mirage3โ€“13-0.0830%31 Jan โ†’
dust223โ€“25-0.0328%25 Jan โ†’
ancient6โ€“13-0.0731%24 Jan โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0325%22 Jan โ†’
train7โ€“13-0.053%6 Jan โ†’
train13โ€“11-0.0619%18 Dec โ†’
mirage13โ€“10-0.0222%12 Dec โ†’
dust210โ€“13-0.0222%6 Dec โ†’
inferno8โ€“80.0245%21 Nov โ†’
dust28โ€“10.0220%16 Jun โ†’
dust213โ€“11-0.0614%16 Jun โ†’
mirage5โ€“13-0.0225%9 Dec โ†’
mirage11โ€“130.0335%6 Dec โ†’
inferno19โ€“17-0.0033%8 Sept โ†’
ancient16โ€“10-0.0613%6 Aug โ†’
inferno19โ€“16-0.0524%9 Jul โ†’
vertigo19โ€“16-0.0124%9 Jul โ†’
dust216โ€“120.0119%8 Jul โ†’
inferno14โ€“160.0210%8 Jul โ†’
inferno16โ€“120.0625%8 Jul โ†’
inferno19โ€“22-0.0419%7 Jul โ†’
mirage8โ€“16-0.0217%7 Jul โ†’
inferno11โ€“16-0.0324%4 Jul โ†’
inferno16โ€“12-0.0019%4 Jul โ†’
dust211โ€“160.0426%2 Jul โ†’
ancient16โ€“60.0624%2 Jul โ†’
vertigo12โ€“16-0.0318%28 Jun โ†’
mirage14โ€“16-0.0121%28 Jun โ†’
vertigo14โ€“16-0.0113%28 Jun โ†’
inferno7โ€“160.0514%28 Jun โ†’
inferno16โ€“5-0.0216%18 Jun โ†’
mirage19โ€“160.0217%16 Jun โ†’
dust216โ€“110.0414%15 Jun โ†’
vertigo16โ€“90.0621%15 Jun โ†’
overpass15โ€“19-0.0314%14 Jun โ†’
vertigo16โ€“19-0.0527%14 Jun โ†’
overpass16โ€“120.0813%14 Jun โ†’
inferno16โ€“10-0.049%14 Jun โ†’
inferno11โ€“150.0115%13 Jun โ†’
inferno16โ€“110.0919%12 Jun โ†’
mirage10โ€“16-0.0713%12 Jun โ†’
inferno3โ€“16-0.088%11 Jun โ†’
inferno14โ€“160.065%11 Jun โ†’
inferno16โ€“130.0319%11 Jun โ†’
dust210โ€“16-0.0417%11 Jun โ†’
dust216โ€“20.0611%11 Jun โ†’
dust216โ€“80.0518%10 Jun โ†’
mirage3โ€“16-0.0210%10 Jun โ†’
inferno19โ€“17-0.0118%9 Jun โ†’
inferno16โ€“140.0420%9 Jun โ†’
ancient9โ€“16-0.0321%9 Jun โ†’
inferno3โ€“16-0.0925%8 Jun โ†’
vertigo16โ€“50.0533%8 Jun โ†’
dust214โ€“16-0.0010%8 Jun โ†’
vertigo16โ€“11-0.0517%8 Jun โ†’
vertigo19โ€“17-0.0411%7 Jun โ†’
inferno16โ€“140.0223%7 Jun โ†’
anubis21โ€“25-0.0417%6 Jun โ†’
inferno11โ€“160.0012%6 Jun โ†’
inferno16โ€“60.0221%5 Jun โ†’
inferno16โ€“7-0.0120%5 Jun โ†’
vertigo16โ€“12-0.0117%5 Jun โ†’
inferno16โ€“30.0317%5 Jun โ†’
dust220โ€“22-0.0220%5 Jun โ†’
dust214โ€“16-0.0424%5 Jun โ†’
inferno16โ€“10-0.038%5 Jun โ†’
vertigo16โ€“140.0127%4 Jun โ†’
dust28โ€“16-0.0133%4 Jun โ†’
vertigo16โ€“130.0123%4 Jun โ†’
mirage6โ€“16-0.0320%4 Jun โ†’
mirage12โ€“16-0.0318%31 May โ†’
mirage9โ€“16-0.0216%29 May โ†’
vertigo11โ€“16-0.0216%29 May โ†’
vertigo19โ€“150.0819%29 May โ†’
vertigo16โ€“80.0211%28 May โ†’
inferno16โ€“60.0617%28 May โ†’
dust216โ€“14-0.0414%28 May โ†’
overpass5โ€“16-0.0616%28 May โ†’
mirage16โ€“60.0119%28 May โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’