Osama Bin Ballin

Osama Bin Ballin — CS2 Stats

BR76561198978012122[U:1:1017746394]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,727Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,138Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,130Purple band · top ~15.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,627 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,130 -2,310 22 Aug – 10 Oct · 31 days played
16,13921,911peak 21,91122 Aug10 Oct
21,911Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,627Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-08-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,627
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 124 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,781 below peak (21,911)
  • +977 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,870 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,126), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate46.8%46.8%48.2%1.4% short
Shot accuracy14.9%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.181.061.07above
Match win rate47.8%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOsama Bin BallinFACEITLevel 8 · 1,627 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER18,130 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,627csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning74
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41–52–7Last 10041%Win rateLWLTWTWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · +91ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 10

  • 3–5–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 20

  • 7–10–3 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility4.5
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch2.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning7.4
Utility4.5
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels7.5
Win Impact6.3

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time587ms+38ms
first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–6 · cache, 17 Sept →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · cache, 23 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · anubis, 26 Aug →
13–3Biggest win · anubis, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
9–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 12infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD3512–2334%0.02
cacheB178–947%0.04
anubisD134–931%0.02
nukeS129–375%0.05
ancientB115–645%0.01
infernoD71–614%0.05
dust2C52–340%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

80,929Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,719Matches
47.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
46.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
14.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
9,329MVPs
2,907Hours (in match)
3,336Bombs planted
1,337Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,860
AWP12,309
SSG 081,657
MP91,606
MAC-101,564
MAG-71,174

Lifetime map wins

7,061nuke
3,272dust2
2,833vertigo
2,559inferno
1,688train
261office
107cbble
37lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

740Matches
51%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
72.6ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8951%1.2615.9
Dust27646%0.8913.5
Nuke6659%1.1716.3
Ancient4050%0.9614.7
Inferno1747%0.8913.7
Overpass1479%0.9713.9
Anubis1155%1.0916.4
Vertigo633%0.9812.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
41.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.9%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
586msReaction time
67.0%T opening success
53.1%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
9.47HE damage / grenade
4.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–13-0.0510%10 Oct →
dust213–110.1139%10 Oct →
mirage9–130.0611%3 Oct →
inferno15–150.059%26 Sept →
cache13–110.0117%26 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0111%26 Sept →
nuke13–100.0724%26 Sept →
mirage11–130.0835%25 Sept →
inferno6–130.0214%25 Sept →
mirage4–130.0225%25 Sept →
anubis13–30.0516%25 Sept →
cache15–15-0.057%24 Sept →
mirage6–130.0235%24 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0621%24 Sept →
nuke13–100.0018%23 Sept →
cache13–110.0826%23 Sept →
inferno5–130.0011%23 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0117%20 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0314%20 Sept →
mirage7–130.0713%18 Sept →
nuke13–30.0130%18 Sept →
cache13–60.2521%17 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0333%17 Sept →
mirage13–90.0321%16 Sept →
mirage16–130.1028%16 Sept →
ancient13–110.0222%16 Sept →
mirage13–80.0618%16 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0713%15 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0326%15 Sept →
cache15–150.0322%14 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0413%14 Sept →
dust26–130.0213%13 Sept →
cache15–150.0718%13 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.018%13 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.014%13 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0015%13 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0218%9 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0419%9 Sept →
anubis13–30.0518%9 Sept →
cache8–130.0414%8 Sept →
mirage13–100.0615%8 Sept →
cache13–60.099%8 Sept →
anubis7–130.0716%8 Sept →
nuke13–110.1612%7 Sept →
inferno9–130.049%7 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0119%6 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.013%6 Sept →
cache10–130.0913%6 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0229%6 Sept →
nuke13–100.118%6 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0415%5 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0426%3 Sept →
ancient13–110.0714%3 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0329%2 Sept →
cache13–90.0922%2 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.029%2 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0129%2 Sept →
mirage5–130.0425%1 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0317%1 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0023%1 Sept →
inferno9–130.0517%1 Sept →
anubis8–130.1227%1 Sept →
mirage13–70.0222%31 Aug →
nuke13–70.0325%31 Aug →
mirage13–110.0823%31 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0121%31 Aug →
mirage9–130.0023%31 Aug →
nuke6–130.0611%30 Aug →
inferno13–30.1519%30 Aug →
mirage13–80.0924%30 Aug →
ancient13–80.0124%30 Aug →
mirage8–130.0914%30 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0323%29 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0239%29 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0420%29 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0119%28 Aug →
mirage11–130.0238%28 Aug →
anubis13–110.099%27 Aug →
nuke13–50.0731%27 Aug →
cache7–130.0420%27 Aug →
anubis8–130.0215%27 Aug →
mirage7–130.0111%27 Aug →
anubis2–130.0225%26 Aug →
mirage15–150.0111%25 Aug →
ancient13–40.0511%25 Aug →
mirage13–30.0627%25 Aug →
cache13–100.0020%24 Aug →
ancient13–100.0612%24 Aug →
mirage13–90.0318%24 Aug →
inferno6–130.0738%24 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0426%23 Aug →
cache13–60.0842%23 Aug →
mirage13–80.0519%23 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0323%23 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0221%23 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0617%22 Aug →
mirage8–130.0224%22 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0213%22 Aug →
nuke13–80.0932%22 Aug →
ancient10–130.0313%22 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.