univince

univince — CS2 Stats

CA76561198977346377[U:1:1017080649]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,307Tracked matches42%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,216Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,588Top 25% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#49537 of 261688 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,588 +831 4 Sept – 12 Nov · 33 days played
19,66324,213peak 24,2134 Sept12 Nov
24,310Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,625 below peak (24,213)
  • +584 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,412 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,948), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate41.8%45.7%46.8%5.0% short
Shot accuracy8.3%12.7%13.0%4.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.851.051.060.21 short
Match win rate43.8%45.7%46.3%2.5% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGunivinceFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,588 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning52
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–42–7Last 10051%Win rateWLLLLTWTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 2–6–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 7–10–3 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.2
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact2.4

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time527ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–6 · nuke, 21 Oct →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 23 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · dust2, 7 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 68% over 28infernoWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2819–968%0.02
cacheC187–1139%0.01
infernoC176–1135%0.00
nukeB105–550%0.01
ancientC94–544%0.01
anubisS96–367%0.01
dust2C94–544%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

69,748Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
5,565Matches
43.8%Match win rate
41.8%Headshot %
8.3%Shot accuracy
12,321MVPs
2,216Hours (in match)
4,946Bombs planted
896Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,666
AWP7,091
MP92,214
FAMAS2,105
SSG 081,995
P901,939
MAC-101,502

Lifetime map wins

6,805inferno
5,885dust2
3,821nuke
746vertigo
695train
600lake
112office
68cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

41Matches
66%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
80.6ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1867%1.2917.0
Cache757%1.0816.6
Dust26100%1.0514.5
Inferno560%1.2219.8
Anubis333%0.6812.7
Nuke250%0.7213.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
523msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
44.0%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
14.10HE damage / grenade
7.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.8879% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–40.0510%12 Nov →
inferno10–130.0120%6 Nov →
anubis6–13-0.0214%6 Nov →
nuke6–13-0.0225%6 Nov →
inferno9–13-0.0820%5 Nov →
cache15–150.1026%4 Nov →
inferno16–140.0126%4 Nov →
mirage12–120.0423%4 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0424%4 Nov →
inferno11–130.0318%2 Nov →
cache13–100.0114%2 Nov →
cache6–13-0.0712%2 Nov →
dust213–60.0122%2 Nov →
cache13–70.0723%1 Nov →
anubis13–9-0.0011%1 Nov →
ancient8–130.0122%1 Nov →
mirage13–16-0.0115%1 Nov →
cache15–150.1128%31 Oct →
mirage13–110.0518%31 Oct →
ancient8–130.0124%31 Oct →
inferno10–130.0118%30 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.047%30 Oct →
cache13–60.0327%30 Oct →
anubis13–160.0527%30 Oct →
ancient13–110.0621%30 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0213%28 Oct →
ancient11–130.0127%28 Oct →
mirage8–130.0226%28 Oct →
anubis13–90.0113%28 Oct →
inferno13–70.0337%26 Oct →
cache15–150.0123%26 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0130%26 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0320%23 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0221%23 Oct →
mirage13–100.0420%23 Oct →
nuke9–60.1720%21 Oct →
dust213–30.1021%21 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0312%21 Oct →
mirage13–80.0315%19 Oct →
mirage0–7-0.0320%19 Oct →
mirage13–80.0221%17 Oct →
inferno11–130.0321%17 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0221%16 Oct →
anubis13–30.0116%16 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0017%14 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.0326%14 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0222%10 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0914%10 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0217%10 Oct →
nuke13–100.0115%8 Oct →
mirage13–20.0620%8 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0712%8 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.0419%7 Oct →
nuke10–130.0219%7 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0626%7 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0626%7 Oct →
mirage13–90.0436%3 Oct →
inferno6–130.0322%2 Oct →
inferno9–40.1125%30 Sept →
dust213–100.008%30 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0133%30 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0022%30 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0315%28 Sept →
inferno16–12-0.0820%28 Sept →
inferno13–00.0738%27 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0317%26 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0220%26 Sept →
mirage11–130.0216%26 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0115%25 Sept →
mirage13–80.0028%24 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0312%23 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0231%23 Sept →
cache13–90.0325%23 Sept →
cache8–130.0115%23 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0627%23 Sept →
nuke13–80.0541%23 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0026%22 Sept →
mirage13–80.0123%22 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0716%22 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0617%21 Sept →
cache7–130.0718%21 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0114%21 Sept →
mirage13–100.0516%21 Sept →
anubis13–110.1526%21 Sept →
dust213–50.1021%20 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0218%20 Sept →
mirage11–130.0921%20 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0116%20 Sept →
mirage13–40.0819%20 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0214%20 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0117%20 Sept →
mirage13–60.0816%19 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0230%19 Sept →
inferno13–100.0426%19 Sept →
mirage13–70.0318%18 Sept →
mirage13–50.0619%18 Sept →
mirage13–60.0733%17 Sept →
ancient13–30.0827%17 Sept →
dust29–13-0.047%17 Sept →
cache13–110.0622%16 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.