coolimpi jääkaapissa

coolimpi jääkaapissa — CS2 Stats

FI76561198958776605[U:1:998510877]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,219Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,517Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,413 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,413 → 1,413
+38Tracked matches · now 3,219
+10.0ppWin rate · 43.3% → 53.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 7 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,766 -489 7 May23 Jun · 11 days played
19,22220,836peak 20,8367 May23 Jun
20,836Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,413Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-05-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,413
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 118 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches24
Win rate46%
K/D0.63
Headshot %46%

Measured 11 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.4%43.8%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy11.3%12.0%12.4%1.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.751.021.040.28 short
Match win rate43.4%44.7%45.2%1.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcoolimpi jääkaapissaFACEITLevel 5 · 1,413 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,413csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning34
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45514Last 10045%Win rateWWLLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −68ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility5.2
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch2.8

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.80 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning3.4
Utility5.2
Mechanics3.3
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time633ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 655ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 8 Jun
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–4 · ancient, 7 May
391msFastest reaction time · 4–4 · ancient, 7 May
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 19 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
811In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 60% over 5dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB27141352%-0.03
ancientC1981142%-0.04
nukeC1761135%-0.02
infernoB115645%-0.07
dust2D82625%-0.05
cacheC73443%-0.05
vertigoA53260%-0.01
overpass32167%-0.05
anubis220100%-0.04
office1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

88,823Lifetime kills
0.75K/D
6,263Matches
43.4%Match win rate
44.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
11.3%Shot accuracy
9,706MVPs
2,517Hours (in match)
3,039Bombs planted
1,132Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,287
AWP4,424
AUG3,313
SG 5532,825
MAC-102,676

Lifetime map wins

9,763inferno
5,789nuke
3,496vertigo
3,393dust2
2,965train
207office
152cbble
47lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,017Matches
50%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
66.0ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage49952%0.8412.6
Ancient25646%0.7911.9
Nuke23051%0.8613.0
Inferno21854%0.8812.8
Anubis21446%0.8512.7
Vertigo11559%1.0113.9
Dust211038%0.7611.2
Train7555%0.8512.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.2%Spray accuracy
65.1%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
623msReaction time
20.0%T opening success
28.2%CT opening success
0.80Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
4.66HE damage / grenade
6.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.9798% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–60.0412%20 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0124%17 Sept
ancient17–19-0.0511%13 Sept
dust24–13-0.0723%13 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0217%13 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0517%10 Sept
dust20–13-0.0833%10 Sept
nuke13–50.0119%10 Sept
nuke13–110.0318%9 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0910%1 Sept
inferno4–13-0.049%20 Aug
dust216–120.0119%20 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0821%20 Aug
dust210–13-0.0218%7 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0321%6 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0426%4 Aug
overpass9–7-0.1538%4 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0814%4 Aug
vertigo9–30.1421%4 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0926%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0625%9 Jul
mirage10–130.0213%7 Jul
mirage7–13-0.019%7 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0519%3 Jul
nuke13–100.0115%1 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0826%29 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0014%29 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0115%28 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0114%28 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0511%28 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0614%27 Jun
ancient13–80.0111%25 Jun
mirage13–110.029%25 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0116%23 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0421%18 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0315%18 Jun
mirage13–90.027%18 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0223%17 Jun
nuke11–130.0013%16 Jun
mirage7–13-0.026%15 Jun
nuke1–13-0.0510%14 Jun
ancient9–4-0.0410%14 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0718%14 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0312%14 Jun
office3–13-0.0422%11 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0217%11 Jun
mirage5–13-0.1029%8 Jun
ancient1–13-0.068%8 Jun
nuke3–13-0.127%8 Jun
vertigo8–80.0043%8 Jun
nuke9–00.1911%8 Jun
vertigo9–6-0.1513%8 Jun
inferno9–4-0.0514%8 Jun
inferno9–50.0013%7 Jun
inferno9–70.0630%7 Jun
inferno3–9-0.1712%7 Jun
mirage16–130.0019%6 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0113%5 Jun
inferno6–13-0.078%4 Jun
mirage13–80.0419%3 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0325%30 May
ancient11–13-0.0714%29 May
dust25–13-0.1025%28 May
nuke7–13-0.0226%28 May
mirage12–12-0.0318%26 May
ancient5–13-0.0613%20 May
cache3–13-0.0821%20 May
ancient13–4-0.0116%20 May
nuke6–13-0.0813%19 May
mirage16–19-0.0316%19 May
ancient13–2-0.030%19 May
ancient3–13-0.0812%19 May
nuke13–8-0.0712%16 May
mirage13–7-0.0621%15 May
ancient11–13-0.0516%14 May
nuke10–13-0.0514%14 May
nuke9–13-0.0526%14 May
ancient20–22-0.0413%14 May
ancient13–7-0.055%14 May
nuke13–11-0.0119%13 May
mirage13–7-0.0313%13 May
inferno13–7-0.0613%13 May
cache13–9-0.0014%13 May
dust21–13-0.0214%13 May
dust23–13-0.0525%13 May
cache4–13-0.0419%13 May
cache8–13-0.0813%12 May
nuke4–13-0.0315%12 May
overpass9–10.024%12 May
inferno5–9-0.1917%12 May
cache13–8-0.033%8 May
cache13–6-0.1013%8 May
ancient11–13-0.0418%7 May
anubis13–8-0.0318%7 May
ancient4–4-0.1050%7 May
overpass12–12-0.026%7 May
nuke3–13-0.077%7 May
cache12–12-0.054%7 May
inferno6–9-0.1119%7 May
vertigo13–11-0.027%7 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →