ozzy

ozzy — CS2 Stats

76561198315986907[U:1:355721179]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,244Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,088 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,088 → 2,088
+75Tracked matches · now 1,244
+2.2ppWin rate · 44.4% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,623 -117 4 May – 7 May · 2 days played
17,62317,740peak 17,7404 May7 May
Faceit ELO: 2,088 +0 31 Aug – 20 Sept · 3 observations
2,0882,088peak 2,08831 Aug20 Sept
17,740Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,088Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-04-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,088
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 412 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGozzyFACEITLevel 8 · 2,088 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO2,088csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning57
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–41–4Last 10055%Win rateWWWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · +55ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility4.1
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.7
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time516ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy28.1%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 28.8% → last ⅓ avg 28.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–0 · mirage, 10 Oct →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · ancient, 27 Apr →
344msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · nuke, 20 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC207–1335%0.02
nukeA1811–761%0.02
ancientS128–467%0.03
cacheA127–558%0.03
anubisA116–555%0.07
dust2S118–373%0.03
infernoB84–450%0.02
vertigo—42–250%-0.07
overpass—21–150%0.02
poseidon—10–10%-0.10
alpine—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

805Matches
52%Win rate
1.41Avg K/D
85.2ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage21253%1.3917.9
Ancient11240%1.1816.6
Nuke9460%1.2517.0
Anubis7545%1.4619.0
Inferno6854%1.4317.7
Dust24740%1.2217.3
Train4363%1.4219.2
Vertigo3874%1.8821.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.6%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
505msReaction time
30.6%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
7.62HE damage / grenade
4.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6079% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0337%11 Oct →
mirage13–00.1515%10 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.0619%9 Oct →
mirage8–130.0122%9 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0316%5 Oct →
vertigo0–9-0.3229%4 Oct →
vertigo4–90.0227%4 Oct →
poseidon5–9-0.1041%4 Oct →
nuke9–50.1031%4 Oct →
inferno9–70.1226%4 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.0229%4 Oct →
anubis13–90.0443%4 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0638%1 Oct →
mirage10–130.0231%29 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0133%29 Sept →
dust213–50.0831%23 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0126%23 Sept →
ancient13–80.0222%23 Sept →
nuke8–130.0122%21 Sept →
ancient13–40.1231%21 Sept →
dust211–130.0524%21 Sept →
nuke6–130.0339%20 Sept →
mirage13–60.0132%20 Sept →
mirage13–40.0622%14 Sept →
ancient17–190.0325%13 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0523%13 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0136%13 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0338%9 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0027%9 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0927%8 Sept →
mirage14–160.0324%23 Jun →
inferno9–130.0430%17 Jun →
nuke4–130.0413%30 May →
ancient5–13-0.0328%20 May →
cache3–130.0619%20 May →
cache13–7-0.0329%19 May →
ancient2–13-0.0646%18 May →
cache13–20.0728%8 May →
cache13–110.0118%8 May →
cache13–10.1027%8 May →
cache3–13-0.0334%8 May →
cache13–80.0223%8 May →
cache13–60.0132%8 May →
mirage9–13-0.0130%7 May →
vertigo13–20.0427%6 May →
inferno12–120.0233%6 May →
ancient13–40.0733%6 May →
dust213–80.0035%6 May →
cache12–120.0422%6 May →
ancient13–3-0.0324%4 May →
mirage11–130.0132%4 May →
mirage12–120.0332%3 May →
anubis11–130.0626%3 May →
cache4–13-0.0131%3 May →
overpass13–110.0328%29 Apr →
cache13–40.0735%29 Apr →
anubis12–120.1330%29 Apr →
cache5–130.0426%29 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0324%28 Apr →
ancient13–90.0236%27 Apr →
vertigo13–8-0.0036%27 Apr →
ancient13–100.1353%27 Apr →
nuke13–20.1125%27 Apr →
anubis13–110.0735%22 Apr →
nuke13–6-0.0224%22 Apr →
mirage9–130.1221%21 Apr →
alpine13–90.0936%21 Apr →
dust213–30.0632%21 Apr →
nuke13–50.0333%20 Apr →
inferno13–9-0.0427%20 Apr →
anubis13–50.0727%18 Apr →
nuke13–60.0332%18 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0218%18 Apr →
dust213–80.0733%15 Apr →
ancient13–9-0.0120%15 Apr →
overpass9–130.0140%15 Apr →
nuke6–130.0021%13 Apr →
inferno13–9-0.0239%12 Apr →
nuke13–30.0244%12 Apr →
nuke13–9-0.0222%12 Apr →
dust213–30.1424%12 Apr →
anubis9–50.0827%12 Apr →
mirage13–10.0439%12 Apr →
mirage13–110.0122%10 Apr →
mirage7–130.0033%10 Apr →
nuke13–30.0739%9 Apr →
anubis13–110.0936%9 Apr →
dust29–130.0831%9 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0417%8 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0518%8 Apr →
inferno13–20.0925%4 Apr →
anubis9–130.1028%4 Apr →
dust213–80.0334%4 Apr →
anubis13–30.0723%4 Apr →
inferno2–10-0.0042%4 Apr →
anubis9–130.0626%4 Apr →
mirage13–40.0731%4 Apr →
nuke5–130.0523%3 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0421%3 Apr →
ancient16–130.0722%3 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.