Noodle.Zip

Noodle.Zip — CS2 Stats

CN76561198955621503[U:1:995355775]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

708Tracked matches70%Win rate2024Tracked since
787Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,202Top 25% of 201,197 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#39238 of 248517 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,202 +4,696 1 Apr – 30 Sept · 24 days played
17,29323,202peak 23,2021 Apr30 Sept
23,202Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-03-27

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,202
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,798 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches9——
Win rate67%——
K/D1.12——
Headshot %50%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 4 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate45.6%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy0.1%11.3%12.0%12.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.760.991.020.26 short
Match win rate46.2%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNoodle.ZipFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER23,202 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning42
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateWWLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −7.5pp headshot accuracy · −109ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 474ms

Last 20

  • 15–5 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.7
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.2
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time528ms−119ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 3 Apr →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 20 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · anubis, 23 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 23 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9dust2Weakest map · 36% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2915–1452%-0.01
dust2C2810–1836%-0.02
ancientA138–562%0.01
infernoB126–650%-0.01
anubisS97–278%0.02
cacheC52–340%-0.01
vertigo—31–233%-0.04
nuke—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

10,306Lifetime kills
0.76K/D
889Matches
46.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
45.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
0.1%Shot accuracy
1,242MVPs
319Hours (in match)
1,117Bombs planted
222Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,804dust2
1,410inferno
517vertigo
363nuke
15office
13train
7italy
2ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

88Matches
53%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
59.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4156%0.8711.4
Ancient1747%0.6811.0
Dust21354%0.8411.3
Inferno1070%0.839.9
Anubis450%0.9312.0
Nuke20%0.469.5
Vertigo10%0.477.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
521msReaction time
22.6%T opening success
30.4%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
7.21HE damage / grenade
16.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4797 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.6191% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0116%30 Sept →
dust213–110.0921%21 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0216%21 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0145%20 Sept →
mirage13–80.0515%20 Sept →
ancient13–100.0319%20 Sept →
inferno13–40.0311%20 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0411%17 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0025%17 Sept →
anubis13–00.1326%23 Aug →
dust213–20.0830%10 Aug →
mirage5–130.0325%10 Aug →
dust213–30.0828%10 Aug →
mirage13–00.0719%9 Aug →
anubis13–110.0036%9 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0923%9 Aug →
anubis13–50.0845%9 Aug →
ancient13–80.0626%9 Aug →
mirage13–50.1126%4 Aug →
anubis13–100.0323%2 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0412%2 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0010%2 Aug →
mirage13–90.0315%27 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0328%26 Jul →
dust25–130.0635%26 Jul →
dust213–10.0921%25 Jul →
cache9–10.0225%25 Jul →
mirage11–130.0128%25 Jul →
anubis16–14-0.0117%25 Jul →
ancient14–16-0.0620%25 Jul →
dust213–110.0325%23 Jul →
anubis15–150.0321%23 Jul →
vertigo6–13-0.0216%23 Jul →
vertigo13–6-0.018%20 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0726%20 Jun →
mirage9–3-0.0333%10 Jun →
dust27–13-0.118%10 Jun →
mirage13–80.0210%4 Jun →
inferno7–130.0324%3 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0511%3 Jun →
mirage13–7-0.0315%31 May →
dust29–130.0241%27 May →
dust213–30.038%21 May →
mirage8–130.0227%21 May →
mirage10–130.0220%21 May →
ancient13–9-0.0417%13 May →
dust28–13-0.0921%13 May →
inferno7–13-0.0432%13 May →
ancient6–13-0.0512%13 May →
mirage9–13-0.1225%29 Apr →
cache13–8-0.0136%29 Apr →
cache10–13-0.0715%29 Apr →
mirage13–8-0.009%26 Apr →
mirage13–6-0.0833%26 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0718%25 Apr →
mirage13–90.0118%25 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0840%25 Apr →
mirage13–8-0.0328%22 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0227%22 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0332%18 Apr →
mirage2–13-0.0218%18 Apr →
anubis13–5-0.0322%18 Apr →
inferno3–13-0.0712%18 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.0311%15 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.045%15 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0414%15 Apr →
dust20–2-0.0033%15 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0628%15 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0320%11 Apr →
ancient5–7-0.0314%9 Apr →
inferno13–10-0.0220%8 Apr →
nuke4–13-0.0725%8 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0517%8 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0518%8 Apr →
ancient13–30.0425%6 Apr →
mirage13–100.0613%6 Apr →
ancient13–80.0923%6 Apr →
inferno13–100.0618%5 Apr →
mirage15–150.0514%5 Apr →
dust211–130.0819%5 Apr →
mirage13–40.1415%3 Apr →
ancient13–70.1219%3 Apr →
ancient13–70.1224%2 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0622%2 Apr →
dust24–13-0.1224%2 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0318%2 Apr →
inferno13–8-0.0419%1 Apr →
mirage0–13-0.0817%1 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0819%1 Apr →
vertigo7–13-0.1017%1 Apr →
inferno3–13-0.0419%1 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0529%1 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0419%1 Apr →
anubis13–60.0122%30 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0626%29 Mar →
inferno13–40.0136%27 Mar →
mirage16–14-0.0315%27 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.1122%27 Mar →
inferno13–9-0.0011%27 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0232%27 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.