cheesy4ence

cheesy4ence — CS2 Stats

NP76561198950764150[U:1:990498422]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

911Tracked matches55%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,591Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,290Blue band · top ~42.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,290 -2,710 28 Aug – 13 Oct · 40 days played
11,21515,000peak 15,00028 Aug13 Oct
15,246Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,710 below peak (15,000)
  • -2,456 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,710 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,991), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate44.1%41.3%41.8%above
Shot accuracy8.8%12.7%12.2%3.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.070.950.98above
Match win rate49.0%42.6%43.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcheesy4enceFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER12,290 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning75
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–50–6Last 10044%Win rateLLWWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · +86ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 663ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.4
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels6.1

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning7.5
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels7.5
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time549ms+18ms
first ⅓ avg 531ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 15 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 17 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · anubis, 9 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 4 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 24ancientWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2415–963%0.06
infernoB179–853%0.05
dust2B168–850%0.03
mirageC156–940%0.04
anubisD134–931%0.08
cacheD102–820%0.00
ancientD50–50%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

39,979Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players
1,971Matches
49.0%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 2 players
44.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
8.8%Shot accuracy
6,096MVPs
830Hours (in match)
1,401Bombs planted
502Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,251inferno
3,884nuke
2,105dust2
1,243train
239vertigo
153cbble
52office
10lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
563msReaction time
56.3%T opening success
63.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
8.13HE damage / grenade
6.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–130.0321%13 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0012%13 Oct →
cache13–30.1024%12 Oct →
nuke13–70.0229%12 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0419%12 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0322%11 Oct →
dust211–130.0921%11 Oct →
dust213–160.0413%11 Oct →
inferno11–130.1023%9 Oct →
nuke13–60.249%7 Oct →
ancient4–130.0319%7 Oct →
nuke13–110.0416%5 Oct →
ancient10–130.0520%5 Oct →
nuke13–00.0821%4 Oct →
inferno11–130.0026%4 Oct →
dust213–11-0.080%3 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0322%2 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0517%2 Oct →
dust213–60.067%2 Oct →
dust215–150.0220%2 Oct →
dust213–60.0815%1 Oct →
nuke13–100.0516%1 Oct →
nuke13–60.0721%30 Sept →
cache10–13-0.007%29 Sept →
mirage11–130.0930%29 Sept →
nuke13–110.0423%29 Sept →
nuke13–100.0622%27 Sept →
inferno13–70.1424%27 Sept →
mirage6–130.0925%27 Sept →
nuke13–50.0216%25 Sept →
anubis10–130.0122%24 Sept →
cache13–100.0421%24 Sept →
cache11–130.0415%24 Sept →
dust213–110.1014%23 Sept →
anubis13–30.1218%23 Sept →
anubis9–130.0927%22 Sept →
inferno13–90.0825%22 Sept →
inferno9–130.0519%20 Sept →
cache14–160.1221%20 Sept →
nuke13–40.1722%20 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0415%19 Sept →
nuke13–110.0417%19 Sept →
mirage1–100.0930%19 Sept →
dust23–130.0440%17 Sept →
nuke12–160.0418%17 Sept →
anubis8–130.0618%17 Sept →
mirage10–130.0216%17 Sept →
nuke4–130.0522%17 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0116%16 Sept →
nuke13–160.0522%16 Sept →
inferno13–80.0822%16 Sept →
mirage13–20.1332%16 Sept →
inferno3–130.0617%16 Sept →
nuke13–160.1221%15 Sept →
mirage13–60.0931%15 Sept →
anubis13–30.2636%15 Sept →
nuke13–50.0715%15 Sept →
dust213–80.0222%15 Sept →
dust25–130.0130%14 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0425%14 Sept →
nuke4–130.0120%13 Sept →
mirage13–90.0429%12 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0010%12 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0020%12 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0611%11 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0216%11 Sept →
inferno13–50.1013%11 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0123%10 Sept →
inferno11–130.0312%10 Sept →
mirage8–130.0322%10 Sept →
anubis8–130.0417%9 Sept →
anubis13–90.1215%9 Sept →
dust216–120.1128%8 Sept →
nuke15–150.1120%8 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0226%8 Sept →
nuke10–130.0621%7 Sept →
anubis15–150.1020%7 Sept →
inferno15–150.035%6 Sept →
dust216–130.1425%6 Sept →
mirage13–60.1016%6 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0125%5 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0218%5 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0127%4 Sept →
inferno15–150.0627%3 Sept →
anubis9–130.0113%2 Sept →
anubis8–130.0819%2 Sept →
nuke11–130.0416%2 Sept →
nuke13–50.0824%2 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0824%1 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.026%31 Aug →
mirage6–130.1024%31 Aug →
nuke13–80.0330%31 Aug →
anubis9–130.1326%31 Aug →
inferno13–30.1023%31 Aug →
inferno13–110.0528%30 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0821%30 Aug →
ancient7–130.0218%30 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0632%30 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0418%28 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0721%28 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.