ki11imanjaro

ki11imanjaro — CS2 Stats

DO76561198937549055[U:1:977283327]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

620Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,800Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,504Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33363 of 221174 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 25 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,504 -401 25 May17 Sept · 37 days played
20,59424,024peak 24,02425 May17 Sept
24,559Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-05-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 520 below peak (24,024)
  • +45 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,936 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,496 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches174+13
Win rate59%25%+34pp
K/D1.161.36−0.21
Headshot %40%56%−16pp

Measured 8 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 1 Sep 2026 → 8 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate54.4%45.8%46.8%above
Shot accuracy11.0%12.7%13.0%2.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.111.051.06above
Match win rate47.9%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGki11imanjaroFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER23,504 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning52
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateWWWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · +65ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 473ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.1
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.2
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time504ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 536ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 9 Jul
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · dust2, 4 Aug
344msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · anubis, 16 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 31 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 58% over 19nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB31141745%0.00
ancientA1911858%0.02
dust2A169756%0.01
infernoA148657%0.01
anubisA116555%0.05
nukeD51420%0.01
cache42250%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,444Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
2,131Matches
47.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
54.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
11.0%Shot accuracy
5,227MVPs
1,240Hours (in match)
1,954Bombs planted
414Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,380
AWP7,105
MP91,018
Knife936
P90894

Lifetime map wins

2,891inferno
1,860dust2
1,241nuke
949vertigo
311train
53office
53cbble
14lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

186Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
81.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5153%1.1515.0
Anubis4854%1.1315.6
Dust22654%1.1015.5
Ancient2035%1.1018.4
Inferno1850%1.1915.2
Vertigo1464%1.4017.1
Nuke862%1.0814.0
Train10%0.6813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
496msReaction time
26.1%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
6.25HE damage / grenade
13.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.0513% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–110.0113%16 Sept
ancient13–50.1318%16 Sept
inferno13–60.0925%16 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0411%16 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0221%16 Sept
dust213–60.0512%16 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0422%16 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0410%14 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0223%13 Sept
mirage13–70.0627%12 Sept
anubis13–80.0810%11 Sept
mirage11–130.0317%10 Sept
anubis7–130.0614%9 Sept
mirage4–1-0.0529%9 Sept
ancient13–50.0618%9 Sept
mirage13–2-0.0128%9 Sept
cache1–130.0220%9 Sept
dust26–13-0.0014%9 Sept
dust213–100.0316%6 Sept
mirage14–160.0015%28 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0518%21 Aug
dust213–1-0.010%13 Aug
mirage2–90.0624%13 Aug
dust213–110.0514%13 Aug
cache10–13-0.0421%5 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0313%5 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0016%5 Aug
ancient13–60.0431%5 Aug
dust213–10.0237%4 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0414%4 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0116%3 Aug
dust213–60.0722%3 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0221%31 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0016%31 Jul
mirage10–130.0019%30 Jul
cache13–100.0526%30 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0514%30 Jul
ancient13–70.1232%30 Jul
ancient13–90.0918%29 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0714%29 Jul
mirage13–80.0610%27 Jul
anubis3–80.0523%23 Jul
mirage13–110.0415%22 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0223%22 Jul
inferno13–110.0014%21 Jul
dust213–100.0021%21 Jul
dust211–130.0216%21 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0421%21 Jul
cache13–20.139%21 Jul
ancient13–80.0426%19 Jul
dust21–13-0.059%19 Jul
anubis8–130.0325%14 Jul
inferno13–60.0513%13 Jul
dust210–130.0211%13 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0323%9 Jul
inferno9–130.0425%9 Jul
mirage8–20.0923%9 Jul
anubis13–10.2237%9 Jul
dust27–13-0.0418%9 Jul
dust26–130.0423%6 Jul
ancient9–130.0114%6 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0322%3 Jul
mirage13–110.0213%3 Jul
inferno13–160.0925%30 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0513%30 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0218%30 Jun
inferno10–130.0122%30 Jun
dust213–8-0.0818%27 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0412%27 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0324%25 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0611%23 Jun
anubis13–90.0514%19 Jun
mirage6–130.0232%19 Jun
mirage7–130.0520%19 Jun
dust29–13-0.0315%9 Jun
nuke7–130.0316%9 Jun
ancient15–150.0133%3 Jun
ancient13–100.0123%2 Jun
inferno13–110.0512%2 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0114%2 Jun
mirage8–1-0.0219%2 Jun
mirage5–130.0027%1 Jun
ancient8–130.0621%1 Jun
inferno0–13-0.0613%31 May
anubis4–130.0626%31 May
dust213–80.0331%31 May
ancient13–0-0.000%31 May
mirage13–7-0.0232%31 May
nuke8–80.0931%31 May
mirage11–130.0627%30 May
mirage7–13-0.0228%27 May
ancient4–13-0.0432%27 May
anubis13–60.0326%27 May
mirage8–13-0.0021%27 May
mirage13–11-0.0331%27 May
mirage13–60.0617%27 May
ancient10–13-0.0113%27 May
nuke13–40.0022%27 May
mirage4–13-0.0613%25 May
ancient13–5-0.0217%25 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →