ki11imanjaro

ki11imanjaro — CS2 Stats

DO76561198937549055[U:1:977283327]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

626Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,243Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,578Pink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGki11imanjaroFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER23,578 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning56
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateWWLWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · +84ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility4.7
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.6
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time504ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 531ms → last ⅓ avg 504ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 9 Jul →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · dust2, 4 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · anubis, 16 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 31 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 41% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2912–1741%0.00
dust2A1810–856%0.01
ancientA1810–856%0.02
infernoA148–657%0.01
anubisA127–558%0.05
cacheA53–260%0.03
nuke—40–40%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 29). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,659Lifetime kills
1.11K/D
2,143Matches
47.9%Match win rate
54.3%Headshot %
10.9%Shot accuracy
5,260MVPs
1,243Hours (in match)
1,962Bombs planted
416Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,426
AWP7,145
MP91,021
Knife938
P90899

Lifetime map wins

2,891inferno
1,874dust2
1,241nuke
949vertigo
311train
53office
53cbble
14lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

186Matches
52%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
81.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5153%1.1515.0
Anubis4854%1.1315.6
Dust22654%1.1015.5
Ancient2035%1.1018.4
Inferno1850%1.1915.2
Vertigo1464%1.4017.1
Nuke862%1.0814.0
Train10%0.6813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
489msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
6.16HE damage / grenade
13.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4577 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7891% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–100.0713%28 Sept →
dust213–50.0321%28 Sept →
dust21–13-0.048%28 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0113%23 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0028%23 Sept →
mirage9–130.0615%23 Sept →
anubis13–110.0113%16 Sept →
ancient13–50.1318%16 Sept →
inferno13–60.0925%16 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0411%16 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0221%16 Sept →
dust213–60.0512%16 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0422%16 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0410%14 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0223%13 Sept →
mirage13–70.0627%12 Sept →
anubis13–80.0810%11 Sept →
mirage11–130.0317%10 Sept →
anubis7–130.0614%9 Sept →
mirage4–1-0.0529%9 Sept →
ancient13–50.0618%9 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0128%9 Sept →
cache1–130.0220%9 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0014%9 Sept →
dust213–100.0316%6 Sept →
mirage14–160.0015%28 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0518%21 Aug →
dust213–1-0.010%13 Aug →
mirage2–90.0624%13 Aug →
dust213–110.0514%13 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0421%5 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0313%5 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0016%5 Aug →
ancient13–60.0431%5 Aug →
dust213–10.0237%4 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0414%4 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0116%3 Aug →
dust213–60.0722%3 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0221%31 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0016%31 Jul →
mirage10–130.0019%30 Jul →
cache13–100.0526%30 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0514%30 Jul →
ancient13–70.1232%30 Jul →
ancient13–90.0918%29 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0714%29 Jul →
mirage13–80.0610%27 Jul →
anubis3–80.0523%23 Jul →
mirage13–110.0415%22 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0223%22 Jul →
inferno13–110.0014%21 Jul →
dust213–100.0021%21 Jul →
dust211–130.0216%21 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0421%21 Jul →
cache13–20.139%21 Jul →
ancient13–80.0426%19 Jul →
dust21–13-0.059%19 Jul →
anubis8–130.0325%14 Jul →
inferno13–60.0513%13 Jul →
dust210–130.0211%13 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0323%9 Jul →
inferno9–130.0425%9 Jul →
mirage8–20.0923%9 Jul →
anubis13–10.2237%9 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0418%9 Jul →
dust26–130.0423%6 Jul →
ancient9–130.0114%6 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0322%3 Jul →
mirage13–110.0213%3 Jul →
inferno13–160.0925%30 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0513%30 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0218%30 Jun →
inferno10–130.0122%30 Jun →
dust213–8-0.0818%27 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0412%27 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0324%25 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0611%23 Jun →
anubis13–90.0514%19 Jun →
mirage6–130.0232%19 Jun →
mirage7–130.0520%19 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0315%9 Jun →
nuke7–130.0316%9 Jun →
ancient15–150.0133%3 Jun →
ancient13–100.0123%2 Jun →
inferno13–110.0512%2 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0114%2 Jun →
mirage8–1-0.0219%2 Jun →
mirage5–130.0027%1 Jun →
ancient8–130.0621%1 Jun →
inferno0–13-0.0613%31 May →
anubis4–130.0626%31 May →
dust213–80.0331%31 May →
ancient13–0-0.000%31 May →
mirage13–7-0.0232%31 May →
nuke8–80.0931%31 May →
mirage11–130.0627%30 May →
mirage7–13-0.0228%27 May →
ancient4–13-0.0432%27 May →
anubis13–60.0326%27 May →
mirage8–13-0.0021%27 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.