Naveler

Naveler — CS2 Stats

EE76561198929961934[U:1:969696206]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

430Tracked matches48%Win rate2022Tracked since
953Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,959Top 10% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13901 of 260038 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Oct 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,959 +5,423 3 Jun – 20 Oct · 28 days played
20,30326,461peak 26,4613 Jun20 Oct
26,461Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,146Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-06-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 502 below peak (26,461)
  • +508 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,242 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,041 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,318), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate41.1%49.3%50.9%9.8% short
Shot accuracy8.9%13.4%11.8%2.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.181.121.18meets
Match win rate53.8%48.5%51.9%above

This profile matches the typical Gold band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Gold band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNavelerPREMIER25,959 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,146csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning62
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateLLWLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility4.9
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.2
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time523ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 532ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 2–4 · nuke, 13 Oct →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · inferno, 14 Jun →
352msFastest reaction time · 2–4 · nuke, 13 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 5 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 12anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2613–1350%0.01
infernoB179–853%0.02
nukeD144–1029%-0.01
ancientD134–931%-0.00
cacheS129–375%0.03
anubisD92–722%0.00
dust2C73–443%-0.01
overpass—21–150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

23,755Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 50% of Red band
1,323Matches
53.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Red band
41.1%Headshot %
8.9%Shot accuracy
4,692MVPs
482Hours (in match)
1,629Bombs planted
294Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,342inferno
1,087dust2
876nuke
384vertigo
231train
141office
49ar_baggage
7sugarcane

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

67Matches
63%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
79.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3168%1.2415.1
Ancient1486%1.2316.2
Dust2743%1.1914.9
Anubis617%1.1516.2
Overpass3100%1.9015.3
Inferno333%0.7611.0
Cache10%0.6210.0
Nuke1100%1.2316.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
527msReaction time
50.4%T opening success
47.4%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
5.98HE damage / grenade
7.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.0411%20 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0028%20 Oct →
cache13–30.0127%14 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0320%13 Oct →
nuke2–40.160%13 Oct →
ancient13–100.0821%13 Oct →
anubis13–40.0614%13 Oct →
cache11–130.0417%2 Oct →
inferno13–110.0319%2 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.044%2 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0119%1 Oct →
overpass8–130.0215%1 Oct →
dust213–90.0122%23 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0423%23 Sept →
mirage13–90.0719%22 Sept →
dust213–80.0119%22 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0218%22 Sept →
mirage12–120.0121%14 Sept →
ancient13–60.0120%13 Sept →
mirage13–20.1023%10 Sept →
mirage13–30.0320%7 Sept →
dust210–130.0737%7 Sept →
inferno3–130.0213%6 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0624%6 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0123%6 Sept →
ancient11–130.0125%6 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0317%5 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0012%5 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0119%5 Sept →
mirage13–00.017%5 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0015%1 Sept →
anubis5–130.0118%1 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0719%1 Sept →
cache13–20.0411%1 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0111%1 Sept →
anubis8–130.0218%29 Aug →
cache13–30.0712%29 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0315%29 Aug →
cache13–70.0211%29 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0129%27 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0213%8 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0910%3 Aug →
ancient8–130.0227%3 Aug →
inferno11–130.0314%2 Aug →
cache13–80.0420%1 Aug →
inferno11–130.0314%1 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0418%31 Jul →
nuke16–140.0013%31 Jul →
inferno6–130.0519%31 Jul →
mirage3–130.0520%30 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0513%29 Jul →
nuke4–130.0434%29 Jul →
inferno13–40.0923%29 Jul →
cache13–10.1527%29 Jul →
inferno10–130.0323%29 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0615%29 Jul →
cache13–40.0419%29 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0819%28 Jul →
inferno16–14-0.0319%28 Jul →
nuke1–13-0.0914%28 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0413%28 Jul →
anubis13–110.0318%27 Jul →
nuke10–130.0217%27 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.057%27 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0617%27 Jul →
anubis5–130.0119%27 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.0221%27 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.017%27 Jul →
mirage13–60.069%27 Jul →
cache13–60.0426%27 Jul →
ancient0–11-0.055%27 Jul →
inferno13–30.0620%27 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.019%27 Jul →
mirage13–100.0918%24 Jul →
nuke16–14-0.0512%24 Jul →
inferno13–70.0426%24 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0015%24 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.059%24 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0314%24 Jul →
ancient13–10.0920%23 Jul →
anubis5–130.0316%23 Jul →
ancient6–130.0414%23 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0317%23 Jul →
inferno10–130.0717%20 Jul →
dust22–13-0.1119%17 Jul →
mirage13–60.0129%17 Jul →
mirage2–130.0121%17 Jul →
mirage13–80.0118%15 Jul →
mirage13–50.0823%15 Jul →
mirage17–19-0.0427%4 Jul →
mirage12–120.0716%14 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0214%14 Jun →
overpass13–110.0615%14 Jun →
inferno13–60.0739%14 Jun →
mirage11–20.0219%11 Jun →
inferno13–7-0.0322%11 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.0714%10 Jun →
cache10–13-0.0110%8 Jun →
nuke11–130.0817%8 Jun →
mirage13–40.028%3 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.