GrizzlyClutch

GrizzlyClutch — CS2 Stats

GS76561198923849115[U:1:963583387]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,467Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,566Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,313Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#30340 of 261580 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,467 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,313 +929 12 Jun – 27 Oct · 33 days played
23,38426,137peak 26,13712 Jun27 Oct
26,366Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-06-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,824 below peak (26,137)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • -671 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 687 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate53.3%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy10.5%13.2%13.7%3.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.931.071.090.16 short
Match win rate43.9%46.9%48.4%4.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGrizzlyClutchFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,313 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning41
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–45Last 10055%Win rateLLLLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −82ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.9 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility7.6
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch3.0

Excellent counter-strafingEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.1
Utility7.6
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time607ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–2 · eldorado, 9 Jul →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · mirage, 9 Jul →
422msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · mirage, 18 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 24 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9nukeWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2514–1156%0.01
mirageB2512–1348%-0.00
infernoA2313–1057%0.02
nukeC94–544%-0.01
anubisS96–367%0.03
ancient—32–167%-0.01
dust2—11–0100%-0.04
fachwerk—11–0100%-0.02
debris—10–10%-0.05
eldorado—11–0100%0.29
vertigo—11–0100%0.08
overpass—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

150,138Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
4,612Matches
43.9%Match win rate
53.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
10.5%Shot accuracy
12,751MVPs
2,566Hours (in match)
3,664Bombs planted
2,084Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4758,899
AWP16,138
SG 5534,289
MAC-102,758
MP92,242

Lifetime map wins

12,454inferno
2,828dust2
1,591vertigo
1,476nuke
1,359train
376cbble
119office
80lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

778Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
75.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3754%0.9513.1
Inferno3158%1.1014.7
Anubis2259%1.0613.7
Nuke956%0.8512.3
Ancient633%0.9413.7
Dust2580%0.9111.6
Train475%0.9813.5
Overpass3100%1.2511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
88.1%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
624msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
28.8%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
13.08HE damage / grenade
16.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6507% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke3–13-0.0120%4 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0326%3 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0118%1 Aug →
cache11–13-0.057%31 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0123%31 Jul →
nuke11–130.0111%30 Jul →
inferno13–30.1316%30 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0333%30 Jul →
nuke13–50.0611%28 Jul →
inferno10–130.0215%28 Jul →
inferno13–80.0826%28 Jul →
cache13–90.0512%28 Jul →
cache9–13-0.069%27 Jul →
mirage11–130.0329%27 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0325%27 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0614%27 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0818%27 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0424%22 Jul →
inferno16–12-0.0121%20 Jul →
anubis13–70.0418%20 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0519%18 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0819%18 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0923%18 Jul →
inferno13–30.038%18 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0616%18 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0325%17 Jul →
anubis4–0-0.080%17 Jul →
cache13–100.0225%16 Jul →
nuke16–12-0.0323%15 Jul →
anubis7–130.0426%15 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0123%15 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0418%15 Jul →
mirage0–4-0.070%15 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.0527%14 Jul →
cache13–60.0224%14 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0117%14 Jul →
inferno11–130.0119%14 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0135%14 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0217%12 Jul →
inferno13–70.0417%12 Jul →
cache16–130.0820%10 Jul →
anubis13–70.1013%10 Jul →
mirage7–130.0833%10 Jul →
cache13–70.0413%10 Jul →
inferno13–100.0513%10 Jul →
fachwerk13–10-0.0215%9 Jul →
inferno11–130.0320%9 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0435%9 Jul →
cache13–60.0728%9 Jul →
debris6–9-0.0518%9 Jul →
eldorado9–20.2924%9 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0212%7 Jul →
inferno12–16-0.0225%5 Jul →
cache13–100.0721%5 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0427%5 Jul →
cache13–90.0327%4 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0419%4 Jul →
mirage13–70.0313%4 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0323%3 Jul →
mirage7–1-0.030%3 Jul →
mirage6–130.0727%29 Jun →
anubis13–110.0010%29 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0118%26 Jun →
mirage16–130.0223%26 Jun →
anubis11–130.0413%26 Jun →
inferno13–100.0110%25 Jun →
inferno13–60.0426%25 Jun →
ancient6–130.0114%25 Jun →
inferno13–20.0611%25 Jun →
mirage14–16-0.0421%25 Jun →
anubis13–00.1217%24 Jun →
mirage16–140.0823%24 Jun →
mirage13–90.0232%23 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0126%23 Jun →
cache10–130.0621%23 Jun →
cache13–80.0326%23 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0425%22 Jun →
inferno1–130.0322%22 Jun →
nuke13–90.0516%21 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0428%21 Jun →
ancient13–20.0210%19 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0318%18 Jun →
inferno8–130.0023%18 Jun →
vertigo9–10.0829%18 Jun →
nuke4–9-0.1814%18 Jun →
mirage9–130.0219%17 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0220%17 Jun →
cache11–130.0024%17 Jun →
inferno13–100.0017%16 Jun →
mirage13–110.0622%16 Jun →
cache8–13-0.0414%16 Jun →
cache13–9-0.0419%16 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0323%15 Jun →
cache13–30.0520%14 Jun →
mirage5–130.0530%12 Jun →
nuke13–20.0417%12 Jun →
anubis13–8-0.0014%12 Jun →
cache13–60.0223%12 Jun →
cache13–20.0623%12 Jun →
cache11–130.0223%10 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.