GooseX3

GooseX3 — CS2 Stats

GB76561198881142849[U:1:920877121]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,227Tracked matches59%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,971Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating13,074Blue band · top ~38.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 796 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,074 -1,442 1 Aug – 25 Sept · 12 days played
13,07415,110peak 15,1101 Aug25 Sept
15,110Peak Premier in tracked matches
796Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-07-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 796
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 105 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,036 below peak (15,110)
  • -1,083 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,926 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches21——
Win rate62%——
K/D1.34——
Headshot %42%——

Measured 23 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches44——
Win rate59%——
K/D1.05——
Headshot %44%——

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,745), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate42.6%46.8%48.2%5.6% short
Shot accuracy2.5%13.0%13.3%10.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.061.070.09 short
Match win rate43.5%46.3%46.9%3.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGooseX3FACEITLevel 8 · 796 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER13,074 · Blue bandPEAK ELO796csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning64
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateTWWLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · +38ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility6.9
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning6.4
Utility6.9
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time607ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 24 Sept →
75%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · nuke, 6 Aug →
438msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · nuke, 24 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 1 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
12–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 12ancientWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2010–1050%0.01
anubisB2010–1050%0.00
infernoB178–947%0.00
ancientC145–936%0.00
dust2S129–375%0.02
mirageS75–271%0.01
cacheC52–340%0.03
vertigo—22–0100%-0.02
train—20–20%-0.02
overpass—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

55,641Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
3,387Matches
43.5%Match win rate
42.6%Headshot %
2.5%Shot accuracy
7,689MVPs
1,385Hours (in match)
3,845Bombs planted
812Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,328inferno
5,732nuke
3,223dust2
904train
850vertigo
69office
56italy
43militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

257Matches
53%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
83.7ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke4466%1.3419.5
Mirage4439%1.0916.6
Inferno4448%1.1117.2
Ancient4146%1.3116.9
Anubis3959%1.0116.1
Dust23355%1.1514.9
Cache650%0.9813.3
Overpass475%1.1816.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
75.7%Counter-strafing
13.2°Preaim
602msReaction time
56.6%T opening success
50.6%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
9.23HE damage / grenade
15.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.2121° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke12–120.0220%26 Sept →
cache13–70.1214%25 Sept →
cache6–2-0.0127%25 Sept →
nuke4–130.0320%25 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0126%25 Sept →
dust213–50.0521%25 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0226%24 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0410%24 Sept →
inferno13–50.1410%24 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0212%24 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0418%24 Sept →
inferno13–50.0717%24 Sept →
ancient13–40.0919%23 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0014%23 Sept →
nuke13–50.0115%23 Sept →
anubis3–130.0921%23 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0638%23 Sept →
mirage13–110.0219%19 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0320%19 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0216%19 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0013%18 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0113%18 Sept →
anubis13–80.0118%18 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0129%18 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0319%18 Sept →
mirage13–100.016%15 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0321%10 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0416%10 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.068%6 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0120%6 Sept →
anubis16–130.0115%5 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0317%5 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0310%5 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0215%5 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0117%5 Sept →
anubis20–220.0117%3 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0817%3 Sept →
nuke19–160.0127%3 Sept →
anubis5–130.0229%3 Sept →
dust213–30.1132%3 Sept →
train5–13-0.0221%3 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0221%2 Sept →
nuke13–80.0520%2 Sept →
ancient13–100.0727%2 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0218%2 Sept →
dust213–110.0220%2 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0226%1 Sept →
inferno11–130.0615%1 Sept →
inferno7–130.0218%1 Sept →
cache8–130.0422%1 Sept →
train1–13-0.0217%1 Sept →
ancient7–00.1217%1 Sept →
overpass13–10.0120%1 Sept →
anubis13–00.1052%1 Sept →
mirage13–70.0917%1 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0218%1 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0413%1 Sept →
inferno7–130.0113%1 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0111%31 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.099%31 Aug →
nuke13–100.0427%28 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0224%28 Aug →
nuke13–100.0632%28 Aug →
nuke10–130.0222%28 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0919%28 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0821%28 Aug →
dust213–20.0231%27 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0515%27 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0313%27 Aug →
nuke11–130.0123%27 Aug →
mirage13–110.0016%27 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0238%26 Aug →
anubis13–80.0214%19 Aug →
ancient9–130.0121%19 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0517%19 Aug →
cache15–150.0320%16 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.0228%11 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0319%7 Aug →
nuke13–10.0275%6 Aug →
nuke13–110.0027%6 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.1013%5 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0319%5 Aug →
dust213–50.0213%5 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0017%1 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0422%1 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0713%1 Aug →
dust213–60.0923%29 Jul →
inferno11–130.0518%29 Jul →
nuke13–100.0328%29 Jul →
anubis13–110.0219%29 Jul →
nuke10–130.0212%29 Jul →
dust27–130.0316%29 Jul →
nuke6–130.0824%29 Jul →
vertigo13–11-0.0522%29 Jul →
anubis13–100.0324%29 Jul →
anubis13–70.1119%28 Jul →
ancient8–130.0211%28 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0324%28 Jul →
ancient11–130.0323%28 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0322%28 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.