h3mp

h3mp — CS2 Stats

GB76561197988636068[U:1:28370340]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,955Tracked matches63%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating17,630Purple band · top ~17.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 842 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,630 +1,648 2 Sept – 30 Sept · 14 days played
15,34917,630peak 17,6302 Sept30 Sept
17,985Peak Premier in tracked matches
842Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
18Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 842
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 59 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 17,630
  • +1,648 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,370 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGh3mpFACEITLevel 7 · 842 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,630 · Purple bandPEAK ELO842csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning69
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57–42–1Last 10057%Win rateLWWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.4
Utility6.9
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels6.2
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning6.9
Utility6.9
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels7.3
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time565ms+27ms
first ⅓ avg 538ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 22 Sept →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 2–8 · dust2, 19 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 18 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6nukeWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2211–1150%0.02
dust2S2114–767%0.03
ancientB179–853%-0.00
nukeD144–1029%0.02
anubisA106–460%-0.00
mirageS97–278%0.01
cacheS65–183%0.04
vertigo—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

214Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
83.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5155%1.2117.2
Ancient4045%1.1016.1
Anubis3345%1.0015.2
Dust22955%1.1716.9
Nuke2871%1.2117.4
Mirage2540%1.0615.4
Cache540%1.1419.2
Overpass333%1.1616.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.8%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
566msReaction time
57.8%T opening success
60.9%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
11.32HE damage / grenade
10.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0420%30 Sept →
cache13–40.0921%30 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0916%30 Sept →
ancient13–90.0516%30 Sept →
inferno13–110.1116%30 Sept →
mirage13–50.037%30 Sept →
mirage13–80.0316%30 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0116%29 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0210%29 Sept →
dust216–140.0814%29 Sept →
cache13–50.0314%29 Sept →
anubis13–00.0817%29 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0130%28 Sept →
dust213–50.0312%28 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0217%28 Sept →
cache5–130.0513%28 Sept →
ancient13–30.1021%27 Sept →
dust211–130.0314%27 Sept →
inferno13–90.0017%27 Sept →
inferno13–110.0524%26 Sept →
nuke9–130.0213%26 Sept →
anubis7–40.0120%26 Sept →
inferno7–130.0622%26 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0123%26 Sept →
cache13–70.0625%25 Sept →
cache6–20.0113%25 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.019%25 Sept →
inferno13–80.0828%25 Sept →
dust213–50.0918%25 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0514%24 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0121%24 Sept →
inferno13–50.1115%24 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0120%24 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0122%24 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0413%23 Sept →
mirage13–80.0128%23 Sept →
ancient13–40.0615%23 Sept →
anubis8–130.0516%23 Sept →
nuke13–50.0515%23 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0217%23 Sept →
dust213–70.0617%23 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0317%23 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.097%23 Sept →
dust213–110.0320%23 Sept →
nuke13–50.1026%22 Sept →
dust213–100.0419%22 Sept →
dust213–20.1326%22 Sept →
nuke11–130.0117%22 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.1112%21 Sept →
inferno13–80.0812%21 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0420%21 Sept →
dust213–90.0622%21 Sept →
ancient13–10.0112%21 Sept →
nuke11–130.0217%21 Sept →
nuke11–130.0619%20 Sept →
nuke13–50.0416%20 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0216%19 Sept →
mirage13–20.0416%19 Sept →
ancient13–80.0116%19 Sept →
dust22–80.0832%19 Sept →
inferno6–130.0816%19 Sept →
dust213–110.0322%19 Sept →
inferno13–90.0417%18 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.059%18 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.079%18 Sept →
inferno11–130.0311%18 Sept →
ancient13–70.0511%18 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0212%18 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.087%18 Sept →
inferno6–130.045%17 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0014%17 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0417%17 Sept →
nuke13–60.1017%17 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0417%16 Sept →
inferno13–90.0211%16 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0121%16 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0517%16 Sept →
inferno13–90.0015%15 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0826%15 Sept →
nuke7–130.0510%15 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0326%15 Sept →
dust213–90.057%15 Sept →
ancient12–120.0411%15 Sept →
dust213–60.059%15 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0317%15 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0210%14 Sept →
dust213–90.0517%14 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0312%14 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.053%14 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.032%14 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.077%14 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0119%14 Sept →
dust213–7-0.049%14 Sept →
anubis5–130.0616%13 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0121%13 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0414%13 Sept →
dust29–130.0113%13 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.027%13 Sept →
ancient13–70.047%13 Sept →
mirage13–10.0725%13 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.