Septimus van zyl

Septimus van zyl — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198879824066[U:1:919558338]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,747Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,165Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,596Purple band · top ~22% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,747 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 25 days played since 20 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,596 +4,241 20 Jun14 Sept · 20 days played
12,17317,050peak 17,05020 Jun14 Sept
17,210Peak Premier in tracked matches
836Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-06-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 836
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 65 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 454 below peak (17,050)
  • -454 over 30 days · declining
  • +4,241 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,404 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches127−26
Win rate0%48%−48pp
K/D0.920.96−0.04
Headshot %25%56%−31pp

Measured 11 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 11 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=34,112), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate44.5%44.3%47.0%2.5% short
Shot accuracy19.6%11.8%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.951.031.080.13 short
Match win rate40.4%45.2%46.7%6.3% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSeptimus van zylPREMIER16,596 · Purple bandPEAK ELO836csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning46
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51481Last 10051%Win rateLWWLWLLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · −47ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch1.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.6
Utility5.1
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.07
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time616ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy24.0%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 25.4% → last ⅓ avg 24.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 30 Jun
58%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · mirage, 7 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 8–2 · mirage, 11 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 1 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
511In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 28% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA32201263%0.00
dust2D2571828%-0.02
infernoC125742%-0.01
anubisA85363%0.01
cacheA85363%0.02
nukeA85363%0.04
ancientS64267%0.00
overpass1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

121,231Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
6,585Matches
40.4%Match win rate
44.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Purple band
19.6%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Purple band
21,168MVPs
3,789Hours (in match)
3,360Bombs planted
5,079Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,576
AWP26,856
SSG 083,293
MAC-102,643
MP92,305
P2501,643

Lifetime map wins

14,714dust2
10,282inferno
5,021vertigo
4,419nuke
2,177train
160cbble
115lake
89safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

113Matches
41%Win rate
0.78Avg K/D
57.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage757%0.7712.9
Dust2650%0.6010.0
Train367%0.6310.0
Nuke333%0.6313.3
Anubis10%0.459.0
Ancient1100%0.8113.0
Overpass1100%0.8113.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.5%Spray accuracy
87.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
609msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
12.75HE damage / grenade
2.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.6759 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.9616% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno3–13-0.0224%14 Sept
anubis13–20.0323%9 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0219%9 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0137%8 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0321%8 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0030%8 Sept
dust26–13-0.0419%8 Sept
inferno13–6-0.010%7 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0758%7 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0231%7 Sept
ancient8–130.0827%6 Sept
dust213–40.0225%6 Sept
mirage13–60.0223%3 Sept
ancient13–60.0330%3 Sept
dust26–13-0.0130%3 Sept
dust22–13-0.0632%3 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0029%3 Sept
cache13–30.0229%3 Sept
anubis16–120.0317%2 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0222%2 Sept
dust21–13-0.0923%2 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0218%2 Sept
dust21–13-0.0229%2 Sept
mirage7–13-0.1115%2 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0318%2 Sept
cache7–13-0.0234%2 Sept
anubis1–13-0.1220%2 Sept
dust24–13-0.0919%1 Sept
inferno11–13-0.045%1 Sept
dust29–13-0.0319%1 Sept
mirage13–10.0018%1 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0424%31 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0326%31 Aug
dust211–13-0.0122%31 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0529%28 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0318%28 Aug
mirage11–130.0227%28 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0039%28 Aug
dust23–13-0.0833%27 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0222%27 Aug
cache13–8-0.0542%27 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0331%27 Aug
dust23–130.0225%27 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0321%27 Aug
dust213–100.0618%26 Aug
cache13–100.1418%26 Aug
dust213–50.1036%26 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0717%26 Aug
dust27–13-0.0523%26 Aug
anubis16–12-0.0332%26 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0725%24 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0634%24 Aug
dust25–13-0.0557%24 Aug
mirage13–30.0534%24 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0735%24 Aug
dust216–13-0.0724%24 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0623%24 Aug
dust22–13-0.0427%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0729%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0332%23 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0530%23 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0233%23 Aug
cache10–130.0142%23 Aug
dust29–13-0.0724%23 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0130%18 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0618%18 Aug
dust216–12-0.0433%18 Aug
cache13–10.0544%18 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0129%18 Aug
dust29–13-0.0620%18 Aug
mirage13–60.0641%13 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0027%13 Aug
cache13–70.0019%13 Aug
inferno16–130.0531%11 Aug
mirage8–20.1724%11 Aug
nuke13–40.1418%10 Aug
mirage13–80.1320%10 Aug
anubis9–00.1824%10 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0126%10 Aug
mirage14–160.0427%8 Aug
cache9–13-0.0218%27 Jul
nuke0–8-0.1029%27 Jul
inferno13–100.0628%2 Jul
nuke13–60.0133%2 Jul
anubis11–130.0420%1 Jul
dust213–90.0525%1 Jul
mirage13–00.1026%1 Jul
nuke13–10.1024%1 Jul
mirage13–110.0128%1 Jul
dust213–30.1521%1 Jul
nuke9–130.0324%1 Jul
dust27–13-0.0524%30 Jun
dust27–130.0220%30 Jun
overpass5–130.0520%30 Jun
mirage13–90.1229%30 Jun
nuke13–40.1919%30 Jun
ancient13–70.0718%30 Jun
mirage13–70.0834%22 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0217%20 Jun
dust24–13-0.0032%20 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →