unb10

unb10 — CS2 Stats

HU76561198875176964[U:1:914911236]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,025Tracked matches37%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,297Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,382 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,382 → 1,382
+34Tracked matches · now 1,025
−8.2ppWin rate · 44.8% → 36.7%

Rating over time

1,382Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
76Days played since 2025-01-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,382
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 149 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate46.6%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy1.3%11.3%12.0%10.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.690.991.020.33 short
Match win rate45.4%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGunb10FACEITLevel 4 · 1,382 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,382csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning41
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–59–1Last 10040%Win rateLLLWLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.4
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.1
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time582ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 4 Jun →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · dust2, 14 Dec →
445msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · cache, 4 Jun →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 4 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L3Current streak
9–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5nukeWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2613–1350%-0.02
dust2B1910–953%-0.03
ancientD164–1225%-0.03
infernoC145–936%-0.01
nukeD112–918%-0.04
cacheD62–433%-0.00
anubisA53–260%-0.03
vertigo—21–150%-0.09
overpass—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

17,586Lifetime kills
0.69K/D
1,210Matches
45.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
46.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
1.3%Shot accuracy
1,952MVPs
1,295Hours (in match)
2,276Bombs planted
355Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-477,327
MP71,984
Knife575
AWP279
HE Grenade166

Lifetime map wins

1,779dust2
1,153inferno
766nuke
151vertigo
136train
16cbble
8ar_shoots
6office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,092Matches
48%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
61.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage39354%0.7912.0
Ancient18849%0.6911.4
Dust215542%0.6910.9
Anubis10651%0.7411.4
Inferno8842%0.7211.9
Nuke6534%0.6711.2
Overpass1741%0.7613.2
Cache1729%0.7311.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.9%Headshot accuracy
39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
572msReaction time
24.7%T opening success
28.8%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
7.76HE damage / grenade
4.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.9378% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.7335% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–13-0.0416%30 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0610%30 Sept →
mirage6–130.0118%30 Sept →
nuke13–110.0222%24 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0013%24 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0616%24 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0118%24 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0514%24 Sept →
ancient17–19-0.0411%23 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0211%20 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0317%19 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.069%19 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0218%19 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0331%15 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0513%30 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0412%27 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0211%24 Aug →
mirage16–120.0011%23 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0113%16 Aug →
mirage21–25-0.0813%15 Aug →
cache11–130.0618%12 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0516%10 Aug →
dust213–100.0314%26 Jul →
mirage16–12-0.0516%26 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0419%25 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0417%25 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0215%18 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0519%14 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0316%10 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0415%10 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0814%6 Jul →
inferno8–130.0018%30 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.0215%30 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.039%26 Jun →
mirage15–150.0346%25 Jun →
inferno13–20.0132%22 Jun →
vertigo7–9-0.127%18 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.046%10 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0212%6 Jun →
cache13–5-0.028%6 Jun →
dust217–19-0.049%5 Jun →
cache13–10.1128%4 Jun →
nuke7–130.0517%4 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.090%2 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0421%2 May →
mirage13–9-0.0712%25 Apr →
mirage13–90.1011%14 Apr →
mirage13–2-0.044%13 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0511%12 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0623%11 Apr →
inferno13–8-0.025%22 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.0214%15 Mar →
dust213–90.0224%12 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.0034%11 Mar →
inferno13–40.0926%8 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.0248%5 Feb →
dust213–20.0933%5 Feb →
ancient13–9-0.0121%17 Jan →
ancient7–13-0.0617%1 Jan →
mirage8–13-0.0719%30 Dec →
inferno13–7-0.0212%19 Dec →
ancient13–5-0.0212%19 Dec →
dust28–13-0.0850%14 Dec →
mirage9–13-0.0213%12 Dec →
dust25–13-0.0835%9 Dec →
vertigo9–6-0.0620%7 Dec →
inferno6–9-0.0429%3 Dec →
nuke0–9-0.210%3 Dec →
nuke9–30.0513%3 Dec →
inferno7–90.0132%3 Dec →
nuke4–13-0.046%29 Nov →
dust29–13-0.0922%23 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0420%17 Nov →
mirage2–13-0.0119%16 Nov →
mirage13–90.0525%16 Nov →
overpass7–13-0.0220%12 Nov →
nuke9–13-0.0816%2 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0530%31 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0011%11 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0515%11 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0424%4 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0719%4 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0913%26 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0711%13 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.098%6 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0116%13 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0423%5 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.0141%7 Jun →
dust213–70.0421%31 May →
mirage11–13-0.0513%16 May →
dust213–11-0.0011%16 May →
anubis9–13-0.0810%17 Apr →
dust216–14-0.0319%28 Mar →
mirage9–130.0217%22 Feb →
anubis13–110.0318%21 Feb →
nuke14–16-0.0113%20 Feb →
mirage13–8-0.0618%15 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0319%5 Feb →
inferno13–16-0.0126%24 Jan →
mirage9–13-0.0225%24 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.