SkinnyJeansThomas

SkinnyJeansThomas — CS2 Stats

DE76561198874940429[U:1:914674701]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,867Tracked matches76%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,356Hours in CS25Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,648 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (29 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,648 → 1,648
+57Tracked matches · now 1,867
+37.4ppWin rate · 38.5% → 75.9%

Rating over time

1,648Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-07-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,648
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 103 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches93——
Win rate55%——
K/D0.82——
Headshot %44%——

Measured 17 Sep 2026 → 16 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,088), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate43.0%46.8%48.2%5.3% short
Shot accuracy5.3%13.0%13.2%8.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.961.061.070.11 short
Match win rate44.0%46.3%46.9%2.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSkinnyJeansThomasFACEITLevel 8 · 1,648 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,648csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning56
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–44–8Last 10048%Win rateWWLWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · +100ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility6.5
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.6
Utility6.5
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time540ms−124ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy12.6%−5.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 12.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 12–12 · vertigo, 19 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · vertigo, 25 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 11–1 · vertigo, 5 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 28 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 64% over 14ancientWeakest map · 33% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB3317–1652%0.01
ancientD217–1433%-0.03
vertigoA149–564%0.01
anubisA148–657%-0.01
cacheC114–736%0.02
mirage—31–233%-0.01
dust2—22–0100%-0.03
inferno—10–10%-0.01
overpass—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

100,554Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
5,343Matches
44.0%Match win rate
43.0%Headshot %
5.3%Shot accuracy
10,865MVPs
2,360Hours (in match)
6,897Bombs planted
1,449Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,199
AWP4,996
MP92,656
MAC-102,655
FAMAS2,396

Lifetime map wins

9,361nuke
6,735vertigo
4,017dust2
2,626inferno
701train
54ar_shoots
46cbble
41ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,513Matches
50%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
79.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient31651%1.0716.1
Nuke30861%1.1916.5
Anubis21947%1.1316.1
Dust215437%0.9214.8
Mirage12839%1.0615.2
Overpass12057%1.1516.8
Inferno9344%1.0114.2
Cache3636%1.1216.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.6%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.4%Spray accuracy
88.1%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
536msReaction time
46.8%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
13.40HE damage / grenade
9.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.6238% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–50.0413%13 Oct →
vertigo13–80.0412%13 Oct →
cache3–13-0.079%12 Oct →
ancient13–70.037%12 Oct →
nuke11–130.0116%12 Oct →
nuke13–40.0523%12 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0110%12 Oct →
cache13–90.015%11 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0013%11 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0518%10 Oct →
vertigo11–1-0.0210%5 Oct →
nuke13–80.0411%5 Oct →
vertigo13–40.0918%5 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.053%5 Oct →
cache13–90.0421%5 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0310%4 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0135%4 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0214%4 Oct →
nuke13–110.046%29 Sept →
vertigo13–100.016%29 Sept →
nuke13–40.0320%27 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0116%27 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.017%27 Sept →
cache13–100.0510%27 Sept →
nuke13–70.0116%27 Sept →
vertigo13–50.0813%27 Sept →
nuke13–70.0411%26 Sept →
nuke12–120.0518%26 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.005%25 Sept →
anubis10–130.0012%24 Sept →
vertigo12–120.1210%19 Sept →
nuke13–100.0810%19 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.0610%17 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0218%17 Sept →
anubis13–70.017%17 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0519%15 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0315%14 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0117%14 Sept →
cache13–60.0119%10 Sept →
cache10–130.0411%9 Sept →
ancient20–22-0.0311%8 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.026%8 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.033%4 Sept →
anubis16–140.0010%4 Sept →
nuke12–120.0910%3 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0715%3 Sept →
nuke8–130.0310%2 Sept →
nuke7–5-0.0125%1 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0115%31 Aug →
nuke13–110.0313%30 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0015%29 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0112%29 Aug →
anubis13–100.0515%29 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0719%29 Aug →
ancient13–20.0313%28 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.063%28 Aug →
vertigo10–13-0.0615%28 Aug →
anubis13–90.0618%28 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0316%28 Aug →
anubis8–130.0123%27 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0417%27 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0213%27 Aug →
nuke12–12-0.0316%26 Aug →
ancient17–19-0.068%26 Aug →
anubis13–110.028%26 Aug →
vertigo13–6-0.0235%25 Aug →
overpass2–130.0426%25 Aug →
cache11–130.0518%25 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.106%25 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0514%22 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0121%21 Aug →
ancient13–110.0915%20 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0716%20 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0910%19 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0012%17 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0114%16 Aug →
vertigo12–12-0.0518%15 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0430%15 Aug →
nuke13–90.0718%15 Aug →
cache14–160.0133%12 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0611%11 Aug →
vertigo13–9-0.0034%11 Aug →
nuke7–130.0426%11 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0819%10 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.087%10 Aug →
nuke6–130.0715%9 Aug →
cache7–130.0123%9 Aug →
anubis17–19-0.0811%8 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0715%8 Aug →
vertigo13–8-0.0319%8 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0529%8 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0532%8 Aug →
ancient13–80.0317%8 Aug →
vertigo13–50.0118%7 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0528%7 Aug →
nuke13–100.0019%1 Aug →
anubis13–100.0615%31 Jul →
vertigo3–130.0711%27 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.028%26 Jul →
cache6–130.026%25 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.