scully

scully — CS2 Stats

GB76561198872807797[U:1:912542069]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,711Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,939Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating23,820Top 25% of 208,919 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33611 of 256067 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,820 +1,732 18 Aug – 21 Oct · 36 days played
22,08823,825peak 23,82518 Aug21 Oct
24,187Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-08-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 5 below peak (23,825)
  • -5 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,180 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches37——
Win rate54%——
K/D1.44——
Headshot %60%——

Measured 23 Sep 2026 → 22 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,312), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate51.8%42.7%43.7%above
Shot accuracy9.5%11.2%12.0%2.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.860.991.020.16 short
Match win rate37.5%43.9%44.7%7.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGscullyFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER23,820 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning64
Utility81

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateLWWWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · +42ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility8.1
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Utility. Utility score of 81 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.4
Utility8.1
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time566ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–7 · anubis, 15 Oct →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · nuke, 1 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 29 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 27 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 18cacheWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2013–765%-0.00
mirageB189–950%0.01
anubisS1812–667%0.01
nukeB168–850%0.01
cacheD144–1029%-0.00
dust2B84–450%0.00
infernoS64–267%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

80,533Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
4,519Matches
37.5%Match win rate
51.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
9.5%Shot accuracy
6,527MVPs
1,979Hours (in match)
3,870Bombs planted
839Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,115
AWP6,708
MAC-101,953
MP91,732
FAMAS1,481

Lifetime map wins

5,624inferno
3,192nuke
1,149train
682dust2
427vertigo
136cbble
63office
29italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

25Matches
44%Win rate
0.71Avg K/D
—ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient650%0.8710.2
Anubis540%1.0415.2
Mirage250%0.687.0
Overpass10%0.8814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
561msReaction time
37.8%T opening success
61.2%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
16.5%Flash assists
8.36HE damage / grenade
18.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.8467% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0211%21 Oct →
mirage13–80.0423%21 Oct →
mirage13–50.1019%21 Oct →
anubis13–90.0321%20 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.0811%20 Oct →
ancient13–40.0332%20 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0524%20 Oct →
cache13–90.0421%15 Oct →
anubis13–70.1127%15 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0220%15 Oct →
dust25–130.0126%15 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0515%15 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0116%12 Oct →
dust213–40.0410%12 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0416%12 Oct →
inferno13–10.0415%9 Oct →
dust213–110.0332%9 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0124%5 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0715%5 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0421%5 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0014%4 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0027%4 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0328%4 Oct →
nuke13–30.0643%1 Oct →
ancient13–30.0833%1 Oct →
anubis11–130.0223%1 Oct →
inferno9–130.0020%30 Sept →
mirage13–80.0727%30 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0321%30 Sept →
inferno13–80.1016%28 Sept →
inferno13–110.0331%28 Sept →
anubis13–50.0518%28 Sept →
ancient4–130.0124%28 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0519%24 Sept →
dust213–60.0319%24 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0424%23 Sept →
dust211–130.0218%23 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0411%23 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0412%22 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0218%22 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0617%22 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0815%22 Sept →
ancient13–10.022%19 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0524%19 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0216%18 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.0413%18 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0421%17 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0016%15 Sept →
anubis16–12-0.0312%15 Sept →
cache11–130.0417%14 Sept →
nuke13–110.0341%14 Sept →
mirage12–160.0518%10 Sept →
cache13–80.0322%9 Sept →
nuke8–130.0125%9 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0418%8 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0416%8 Sept →
ancient10–130.0516%8 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0018%8 Sept →
nuke16–120.0523%7 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0812%7 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0314%6 Sept →
mirage13–20.0616%6 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0024%5 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0436%4 Sept →
ancient13–90.0016%4 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0518%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0116%4 Sept →
cache9–130.0221%2 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.016%2 Sept →
ancient11–130.0114%2 Sept →
anubis13–70.0218%2 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0028%2 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0220%2 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0220%1 Sept →
cache7–130.0131%31 Aug →
anubis13–60.0726%31 Aug →
nuke3–130.0039%31 Aug →
mirage13–70.0335%31 Aug →
ancient13–160.0227%29 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0718%29 Aug →
nuke13–40.0825%29 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0034%29 Aug →
mirage13–40.0727%29 Aug →
mirage13–40.0432%29 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0226%29 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0423%29 Aug →
cache13–30.0332%27 Aug →
anubis13–00.1017%27 Aug →
nuke13–100.0726%26 Aug →
anubis9–130.0733%26 Aug →
cache16–130.0121%26 Aug →
nuke5–130.0132%26 Aug →
cache10–130.0121%24 Aug →
nuke15–150.0324%23 Aug →
anubis16–140.0719%23 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0224%23 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0819%20 Aug →
mirage13–70.0032%20 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0216%20 Aug →
ancient13–100.0022%18 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.