Jennie Kim

Jennie Kim — CS2 Stats

KH76561198870293310[U:1:910027582]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,299Tracked matches48%Win rate2024Tracked since
656Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,265 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,299 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 25 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,081 +82 25 Dec30 Dec · 4 days played
18,94419,192peak 19,19225 Dec30 Dec
Faceit ELO: 2,265 +0 3 Sept18 Sept · 5 observations
2,2652,265peak 2,2653 Sept18 Sept
19,192Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,265Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2025-12-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,265
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 235 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate60.8%48.3%51.0%above
Shot accuracy0.4%13.2%13.7%13.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.881.071.090.21 short
Match win rate42.3%46.9%48.4%6.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJennie KimFACEITLevel 9 · 2,265 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,265csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning54
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY523612Last 10052%Win rateWLLLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 35%
  • Avg reaction 695ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 665ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 673ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.2

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 658ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.4
Utility4.9
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time668ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 696ms → last ⅓ avg 668ms
Headshot accuracy31.3%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 32.9% → last ⅓ avg 31.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 23 Jul
65%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · train, 2 Jan
484msFastest reaction time · 4–8 · anubis, 30 Jul
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 22 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 58% over 24anubisWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A24141058%0.05
infernoB20101050%0.03
mirageA1810856%0.02
ancientA127558%0.04
anubisC94544%0.01
nukeA95456%0.01
poseidon21150%-0.00
overpass2020%0.02
train21150%0.04
vertigo1010%-0.01
fachwerk1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,769Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
1,759Matches
42.3%Match win rate
60.8%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players
0.4%Shot accuracy
3,794MVPs
656Hours (in match)
832Bombs planted
286Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,269
AWP2,175
MP9863
Knife457

Lifetime map wins

4,205dust2
2,753inferno
954nuke
289train
195vertigo
7office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

790Matches
50%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
83.6ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20952%1.1016.7
Dust220849%1.1117.5
Inferno12358%1.1818.4
Ancient11845%1.1318.0
Anubis6841%1.1718.4
Nuke3847%1.0916.8
Train2055%1.1816.4
Overpass520%1.4115.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.7%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.4%Spray accuracy
89.8%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
658msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
55.1%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
13.10HE damage / grenade
6.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.3833% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–120.0539%9 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0632%8 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0130%8 Aug
anubis6–130.0230%7 Aug
dust213–110.0243%7 Aug
dust29–13-0.0130%7 Aug
ancient16–19-0.0125%6 Aug
mirage16–120.0433%5 Aug
anubis13–110.0934%3 Aug
nuke8–130.0131%3 Aug
dust215–150.0237%3 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0326%1 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1050%31 Jul
inferno9–7-0.0629%31 Jul
vertigo7–13-0.0133%31 Jul
mirage13–40.1033%31 Jul
mirage8–130.0433%31 Jul
anubis4–8-0.0436%30 Jul
mirage5–130.0010%30 Jul
inferno17–19-0.0127%30 Jul
inferno13–60.0438%30 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0221%30 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0713%30 Jul
ancient13–100.1038%30 Jul
nuke12–120.0740%30 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0623%28 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0618%27 Jul
mirage13–30.0029%27 Jul
nuke16–140.0333%27 Jul
ancient16–120.0328%27 Jul
mirage12–120.0024%25 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0147%25 Jul
inferno7–130.0538%25 Jul
ancient13–100.0345%24 Jul
dust213–90.0339%23 Jul
dust213–110.0832%23 Jul
anubis6–130.0735%23 Jul
dust212–120.1230%23 Jul
dust213–100.0524%23 Jul
ancient8–130.0936%23 Jul
ancient4–130.0023%23 Jul
poseidon2–9-0.0559%23 Jul
nuke2–9-0.0743%23 Jul
inferno9–20.2934%23 Jul
overpass6–90.0426%23 Jul
dust213–60.1031%23 Jul
dust213–60.1647%23 Jul
nuke9–50.2032%23 Jul
inferno8–80.1029%23 Jul
poseidon9–70.0430%23 Jul
inferno2–9-0.0924%23 Jul
mirage5–130.0417%23 Jul
inferno13–20.0716%23 Jul
dust212–120.0735%22 Jul
nuke13–00.0135%22 Jul
mirage13–40.0136%22 Jul
ancient13–60.1329%22 Jul
anubis13–2-0.0227%22 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0033%21 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0229%20 Jul
dust213–40.1340%20 Jul
inferno13–50.1226%20 Jul
fachwerk11–130.0124%20 Jul
inferno13–70.0422%19 Jul
inferno13–110.0930%12 Jun
mirage13–70.0430%11 Jun
inferno12–120.0833%11 Jun
train13–70.0936%11 Jun
dust212–120.1030%4 Jun
inferno13–80.0730%4 Jun
dust213–110.0748%2 Jun
dust213–40.1927%2 Jun
mirage13–90.0520%1 Jun
anubis13–60.0635%27 May
dust213–50.0835%30 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0330%28 Apr
inferno13–60.0420%25 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0029%25 Apr
dust28–13-0.0133%25 Apr
nuke13–20.0033%25 Apr
inferno10–130.0023%23 Apr
ancient13–80.0620%23 Apr
dust213–7-0.0127%22 Apr
ancient13–160.0422%22 Apr
mirage15–150.0341%21 Apr
inferno11–130.0527%21 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0431%18 Apr
dust213–4-0.0015%17 Apr
dust213–40.0040%25 Feb
mirage6–130.0232%5 Jan
dust213–60.1244%2 Jan
train12–12-0.0165%2 Jan
overpass0–13-0.0030%30 Dec
ancient13–50.0355%29 Dec
dust211–13-0.0432%29 Dec
dust215–150.0222%29 Dec
dust215–15-0.0435%27 Dec
nuke4–13-0.1238%25 Dec
dust216–19-0.0227%25 Dec
mirage13–4-0.0153%25 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →