Yato666

Yato666 — CS2 Stats

MM76561198869478682[U:1:909212954]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,954Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,965Hours in CS28Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,276Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#79584 of 260011 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,276 +5,390 4 Sept – 4 Nov · 22 days played
14,88622,390peak 22,3904 Sept4 Nov
22,491Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,114 below peak (22,390)
  • +276 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,724 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate51.3%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy8.5%12.2%11.2%2.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.970.980.990.02 short
Match win rate43.5%43.3%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGYato666FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER20,276 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning72
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateLLWLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.0
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels4.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning7.2
Utility6.0
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels7.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time570ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–8 · ancient, 9 Oct →
62%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · ancient, 26 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · mirage, 30 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2412–1250%0.02
dust2C229–1341%0.01
ancientB158–753%0.01
anubisC145–936%0.00
infernoA116–555%0.01
cacheS97–278%0.01
nukeS54–180%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,238Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
4,020Matches
43.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
51.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 3 players
8.5%Shot accuracy
8,222MVPs
1,617Hours (in match)
3,869Bombs planted
974Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,598
AWP10,108
MP92,620
MAC-101,727
FAMAS1,450

Lifetime map wins

7,755dust2
7,639inferno
2,027nuke
1,436vertigo
457train
112cbble
93office
82lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.1%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
89.0%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
546msReaction time
65.2%T opening success
53.1%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
6.73HE damage / grenade
21.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–130.0217%4 Nov →
mirage4–130.0224%4 Nov →
cache16–120.0121%4 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.0218%2 Nov →
anubis13–20.0036%2 Nov →
inferno14–16-0.0416%1 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.0619%30 Oct →
nuke13–100.0327%30 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0438%30 Oct →
mirage13–80.0217%30 Oct →
dust213–90.0324%30 Oct →
dust213–40.0421%29 Oct →
mirage10–130.0418%29 Oct →
inferno13–60.0420%29 Oct →
anubis7–130.0022%28 Oct →
mirage13–100.0532%28 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0030%28 Oct →
ancient13–110.0424%28 Oct →
dust213–90.1416%26 Oct →
mirage13–50.0726%26 Oct →
ancient13–70.0962%26 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0210%26 Oct →
mirage4–130.0016%19 Oct →
dust29–130.0727%15 Oct →
mirage13–100.1544%15 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0524%13 Oct →
mirage13–70.0322%13 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0219%13 Oct →
dust214–160.0141%13 Oct →
cache13–110.0225%12 Oct →
mirage13–40.0628%12 Oct →
cache5–130.0424%12 Oct →
ancient13–100.0423%12 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0027%12 Oct →
cache13–110.0323%12 Oct →
mirage13–110.0324%12 Oct →
anubis4–130.0125%12 Oct →
ancient13–80.1622%9 Oct →
nuke13–50.1223%9 Oct →
dust213–30.1547%9 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0147%9 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0029%8 Oct →
anubis14–160.0724%8 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0227%8 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0535%8 Oct →
mirage13–30.0721%5 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0415%5 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0813%5 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0314%5 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0324%5 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0135%5 Oct →
inferno8–130.0824%5 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0322%5 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0518%5 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0220%5 Oct →
dust26–130.0112%1 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0515%1 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0326%1 Oct →
ancient13–70.0522%1 Oct →
inferno13–70.0214%1 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0236%30 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0938%30 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0722%30 Sept →
anubis11–130.0621%30 Sept →
dust22–130.0225%30 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0321%30 Sept →
dust213–100.0618%29 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0714%29 Sept →
mirage13–80.0827%29 Sept →
ancient13–100.0033%29 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0123%29 Sept →
mirage13–20.0421%29 Sept →
mirage13–160.0626%28 Sept →
dust29–130.0231%28 Sept →
dust25–130.0421%28 Sept →
anubis13–110.0335%28 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0427%28 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0422%28 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0221%28 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0326%26 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0129%26 Sept →
cache13–2-0.0833%26 Sept →
nuke13–1-0.1010%26 Sept →
dust213–0-0.0722%26 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0711%26 Sept →
ancient15–150.0023%26 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0330%26 Sept →
cache13–90.0443%26 Sept →
mirage13–40.0622%23 Sept →
cache13–50.0322%23 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0321%23 Sept →
inferno13–100.0614%23 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0523%23 Sept →
inferno13–40.0725%23 Sept →
mirage13–70.0123%23 Sept →
ancient15–150.0019%23 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0217%23 Sept →
cache13–100.0235%23 Sept →
anubis13–110.1028%23 Sept →
anubis12–160.0025%23 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.