getzm

getzm — CS2 Stats

FI76561198866290262[U:1:906024534]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,985Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,968Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,641 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=28,192), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate60.3%51.0%
Shot accuracy16.4%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.171.09
Match win rate41.7%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgetzmFACEITLevel 10 · 1,641 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning74
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45532Last 10045%Win rateWWWWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +5.5pp headshot accuracy · +35ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 464ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 493ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.1
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels5.8
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 70% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 70% on T to 53% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning7.4
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels7.8
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time480ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 533ms → last ⅓ avg 480ms
Headshot accuracy28.9%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 31.9% → last ⅓ avg 28.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–6 · anubis, 22 Sept
100%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · inferno, 22 Jul
328msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · nuke, 29 Aug
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 21 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 27dust2Weakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisS2718967%0.01
infernoC25101540%0.01
nukeC2191243%-0.00
dust2D71614%0.00
ancientB63350%0.01
cacheD51420%0.01
vertigo3030%-0.03
boulder21150%0.08
shelter110100%-0.00
fachwerk1010%-0.03
mirage110100%0.02
overpass1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

177,021Lifetime kills
1.17K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players
5,929Matches
41.7%Match win rate
60.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players
16.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 10 players
18,827MVPs
3,358Hours (in match)
5,039Bombs planted
1,729Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4771,351
AWP17,835
SG 5532,229
MP92,165
P2502,114

Lifetime map wins

15,096inferno
4,826nuke
3,931train
3,768vertigo
3,440dust2
818cbble
559lake
72office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,693Matches
51%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
81.0ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno13648%1.0515.8
Anubis11458%1.2017.5
Nuke9849%1.0516.5
Mirage6248%1.0015.2
Overpass5749%1.1717.1
Ancient4650%1.0515.9
Vertigo1844%0.9915.9
Dust21450%1.1119.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.5%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
80.8%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
480msReaction time
70.1%T opening success
52.8%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
12.7%Flash assists
9.36HE damage / grenade
2.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.8161 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–100.0030%22 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0129%22 Sept
anubis13–60.1427%22 Sept
anubis13–30.0829%22 Sept
ancient3–120.0238%19 Sept
cache8–130.0237%19 Sept
nuke9–13-0.1016%18 Sept
nuke16–120.0424%16 Sept
anubis13–60.0135%16 Sept
nuke3–13-0.1375%14 Sept
anubis16–130.0517%14 Sept
nuke7–130.0139%13 Sept
anubis13–20.0111%13 Sept
inferno16–19-0.0227%13 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0048%13 Sept
anubis13–90.0535%12 Sept
inferno7–130.0120%12 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0039%12 Sept
anubis13–60.0719%12 Sept
nuke23–250.0230%11 Sept
inferno13–50.0724%11 Sept
inferno13–50.0736%11 Sept
nuke13–80.0429%11 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0219%9 Sept
dust28–130.0730%9 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0117%9 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0825%9 Sept
anubis13–40.0210%8 Sept
inferno13–100.0227%8 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0519%8 Sept
anubis13–90.0431%7 Sept
nuke9–130.0324%7 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0135%7 Sept
vertigo4–13-0.0335%6 Sept
anubis3–130.0428%6 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0725%6 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0225%6 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0225%4 Sept
anubis13–90.0017%4 Sept
inferno13–90.0743%4 Sept
nuke8–130.0128%1 Sept
anubis17–19-0.0332%1 Sept
nuke13–100.0344%1 Sept
nuke13–40.1141%31 Aug
dust27–13-0.0144%31 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0234%31 Aug
inferno9–130.0228%29 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0036%29 Aug
inferno13–110.0729%29 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0423%28 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0633%28 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0036%28 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0213%28 Aug
shelter13–11-0.0017%28 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0330%26 Aug
nuke13–40.0851%26 Aug
fachwerk5–13-0.0353%14 Aug
boulder13–20.1050%14 Aug
vertigo6–13-0.0325%14 Aug
dust223–250.0134%14 Aug
dust219–170.0131%14 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0122%14 Aug
inferno3–130.0438%14 Aug
cache13–70.0838%13 Aug
dust23–13-0.0528%13 Aug
inferno7–130.0640%13 Aug
nuke13–90.0227%13 Aug
cache4–13-0.0318%8 Aug
boulder9–130.0533%8 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0440%2 Aug
dust28–13-0.0235%2 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0628%29 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0633%29 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0026%29 Jul
anubis13–40.0622%29 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0133%28 Jul
anubis13–90.0226%26 Jul
anubis13–70.0128%26 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0120%26 Jul
cache10–13-0.0232%22 Jul
inferno4–13-0.15100%22 Jul
inferno10–130.0318%21 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0625%21 Jul
nuke13–10.0844%21 Jul
mirage16–130.0228%21 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0133%20 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0027%20 Jul
ancient13–70.1130%20 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0228%20 Jul
cache12–12-0.0134%20 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0332%29 Jun
anubis13–90.0338%29 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0635%29 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0117%29 Jun
anubis22–190.0125%25 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0426%25 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0330%25 Jun
inferno16–140.0438%25 Jun
inferno6–130.0433%24 Jun
dust215–150.0136%24 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →