freees

freees — CS2 Stats

SJ76561198262955866[U:1:302690138]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,593Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,123Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,845 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 9 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

1,845Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-04-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,845
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 156 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-23
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-23

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate44.1%46.8%48.3%4.2% short
Shot accuracy17.7%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.271.061.07above
Match win rate44.2%46.3%46.9%2.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfreeesFACEITLevel 8 · 1,845 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,845csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning46
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48511Last 10048%Win rateWWLLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.4 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility7.4
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.6
Utility7.4
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time552ms−82ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–2 · vertigo, 7 May
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · anubis, 8 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · anubis, 9 Sept
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 13 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 58% over 19anubisWeakest map · 50% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB26141254%-0.00
anubisB22111150%-0.01
infernoA1911858%0.00
overpassB63350%-0.01
vertigo41325%0.07
dust23030%-0.04
boulder31233%-0.03
cache31233%0.02
ancient21150%-0.05
shelter220100%0.02
fachwerk21150%-0.03
debris2020%-0.05
stronghold21150%0.07
poseidon1010%-0.09
eldorado1010%-0.19
italy1010%-0.32
alpine110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

179,172Lifetime kills
1.27K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
6,609Matches
44.2%Match win rate
44.1%Headshot %
17.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
17,957MVPs
3,123Hours (in match)
7,806Bombs planted
2,664Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4762,175
AWP24,789
Knife4,676
P903,723
P2503,395

Lifetime map wins

10,461inferno
8,799nuke
5,373train
4,781vertigo
4,727dust2
1,712cbble
372lake
312safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,622Matches
50%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
78.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno10349%1.1516.9
Nuke9753%1.1516.3
Anubis9145%1.1915.4
Mirage6749%1.2417.8
Overpass5459%1.2117.1
Vertigo3033%1.1115.7
Ancient2846%1.0415.6
Dust21030%1.0614.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
545msReaction time
40.4%T opening success
26.0%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
9.76HE damage / grenade
13.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 25.9643% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–100.0725%22 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0114%22 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0023%18 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0224%18 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0119%18 Sept
nuke16–120.0115%16 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0028%16 Sept
nuke7–130.0217%13 Sept
anubis13–20.095%13 Sept
inferno16–19-0.0215%13 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0215%13 Sept
anubis13–90.0221%12 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0410%12 Sept
nuke13–90.0915%12 Sept
anubis13–60.0112%12 Sept
nuke23–25-0.0113%11 Sept
inferno13–50.0413%11 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0314%11 Sept
nuke13–80.0325%11 Sept
nuke13–70.0227%9 Sept
nuke10–130.0122%9 Sept
dust28–13-0.0717%9 Sept
inferno8–130.0127%9 Sept
anubis11–130.0515%9 Sept
anubis13–40.0150%8 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0323%8 Sept
anubis7–130.0125%8 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0612%7 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0116%7 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0124%7 Sept
vertigo4–13-0.0217%6 Sept
anubis3–13-0.1011%6 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0615%6 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0419%6 Sept
nuke8–130.0215%1 Sept
anubis17–190.0125%1 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0218%31 Aug
dust27–130.0121%31 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0213%31 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0122%29 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0947%29 Aug
inferno13–110.0333%29 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0439%28 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0210%28 Aug
inferno16–130.0333%28 Aug
ancient2–13-0.1028%28 Aug
shelter13–110.0918%28 Aug
fachwerk5–13-0.058%14 Aug
boulder13–20.0123%14 Aug
vertigo6–130.0733%14 Aug
boulder9–13-0.0710%8 Aug
debris3–9-0.0834%8 Aug
poseidon8–8-0.0924%8 Aug
cache8–130.0128%31 Jul
boulder11–13-0.0335%31 Jul
fachwerk13–3-0.0127%31 Jul
shelter13–7-0.0419%31 Jul
eldorado2–9-0.1918%24 Jul
debris7–9-0.0230%24 Jul
vertigo8–130.0324%21 May
cache10–13-0.0120%21 May
nuke13–90.0921%21 May
inferno6–130.0729%21 May
anubis9–13-0.0225%13 May
stronghold13–20.0815%7 May
nuke13–10-0.0012%7 May
vertigo13–20.1935%7 May
italy0–3-0.320%7 May
cache13–110.0511%7 May
overpass7–13-0.039%29 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0317%29 Apr
overpass9–130.0127%29 Apr
nuke13–90.0112%28 Apr
nuke13–110.0425%28 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0423%28 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0021%26 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0214%26 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0217%25 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0220%25 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0513%25 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0113%22 Apr
alpine6–20.0118%22 Apr
stronghold9–130.0620%22 Apr
inferno13–100.0015%20 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0713%20 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0124%20 Apr
nuke2–13-0.0923%17 Apr
inferno13–50.0021%17 Apr
anubis13–80.0120%16 Apr
anubis13–110.0117%16 Apr
nuke13–110.0220%14 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0315%14 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0138%13 Apr
nuke8–13-0.076%13 Apr
nuke16–140.0220%13 Apr
dust22–13-0.0622%11 Apr
overpass13–80.0223%9 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0332%9 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0114%9 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0335%9 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →