Named_fr4n

Named_fr4n — CS2 Stats

US76561198850611193[U:1:890345465]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,693Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,909Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,056Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#55686 of 260012 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,178 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 22,056 → 22,056
0Faceit ELO · 1,178 → 1,178
+4Tracked matches · now 1,693
+5.6ppWin rate · 50.0% → 55.6%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,056 -522 26 Jul – 25 Oct · 30 days played
21,40724,956peak 24,95626 Jul25 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,178 +0 1 Sept – 25 Oct · 3 observations
1,1781,178peak 1,1781 Sept25 Oct
24,956Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,178Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-07-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,178
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 23 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,900 below peak (24,956)
  • -148 over 30 days · steady
  • -1,202 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,944 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate60.4%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy4.3%13.0%13.2%8.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.121.061.07above
Match win rate44.6%46.3%46.9%2.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNamed_fr4nFACEITLevel 8 · 1,178 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,056 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,178csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning58
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–47–5Last 10048%Win rateWWLTLWWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · +27ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 5–3–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility6.3
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact6.9

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time560ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 2 Sept →
65%Best headshot accuracy · 9–11 · dust2, 15 Sept →
445msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 22 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 27 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 65% over 17dust2Weakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2111–1052%0.01
ancientA1710–759%-0.01
anubisS1711–665%0.03
cacheD165–1131%-0.00
dust2D154–1127%0.04
nukeA74–357%-0.00
infernoC73–443%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

96,632Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
2,893Matches
44.6%Match win rate
60.4%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players
4.3%Shot accuracy
6,547MVPs
3,813Hours (in match)
1,777Bombs planted
713Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,695
AWP12,350
FAMAS3,697
MP92,816

Lifetime map wins

4,752dust2
3,300inferno
1,195nuke
945train
129vertigo
97cbble
16office
8italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

165Matches
55%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
86.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4464%1.2619.2
Dust23554%1.4318.2
Ancient2752%1.0616.3
Anubis2556%1.3019.6
Inferno1560%1.1015.5
Nuke729%0.9116.7
Cache617%0.9415.2
Overpass3100%2.2322.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
42.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
557msReaction time
34.7%T opening success
43.9%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
11.1%Flash assists
11.16HE damage / grenade
10.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.6577% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–70.0829%31 Oct →
mirage13–90.0629%31 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0513%31 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0624%31 Oct →
dust210–130.0024%18 Oct →
nuke13–30.1113%18 Oct →
cache13–100.0131%18 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0121%17 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.099%16 Oct →
mirage15–150.0114%14 Oct →
dust213–40.0628%14 Oct →
ancient13–50.0610%14 Oct →
ancient13–60.0311%13 Oct →
dust27–130.0326%13 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0023%10 Oct →
ancient13–80.0317%10 Oct →
dust213–60.0716%9 Oct →
dust26–130.0713%9 Oct →
cache11–130.0415%9 Oct →
dust27–130.1126%8 Oct →
anubis13–40.0919%4 Oct →
inferno11–130.0217%4 Oct →
dust213–60.0913%3 Oct →
mirage9–130.0518%2 Oct →
cache13–50.1212%2 Oct →
dust212–120.0021%2 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0111%22 Sept →
anubis13–60.0514%17 Sept →
mirage8–130.0325%15 Sept →
mirage13–90.0616%15 Sept →
anubis14–160.0320%15 Sept →
dust29–110.0665%15 Sept →
anubis13–90.0127%4 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0717%3 Sept →
dust24–110.1235%2 Sept →
inferno6–90.0224%2 Sept →
inferno9–40.1332%2 Sept →
inferno13–110.0226%1 Sept →
mirage13–50.0319%1 Sept →
cache9–130.0127%1 Sept →
anubis13–30.0930%1 Sept →
mirage13–20.0718%1 Sept →
anubis13–90.0524%30 Aug →
ancient13–90.0412%30 Aug →
dust210–13-0.027%29 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0426%29 Aug →
ancient13–90.0023%29 Aug →
mirage13–110.0218%28 Aug →
anubis13–70.0818%27 Aug →
cache15–150.0513%27 Aug →
ancient10–130.0121%26 Aug →
anubis8–130.0117%23 Aug →
anubis10–130.0422%23 Aug →
inferno1–13-0.0616%22 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0017%22 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0311%21 Aug →
anubis13–40.059%21 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.029%21 Aug →
mirage10–130.0215%21 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0810%17 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0815%17 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0216%16 Aug →
mirage9–130.0716%16 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0718%16 Aug →
anubis13–30.0627%16 Aug →
ancient13–30.0523%16 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0616%16 Aug →
mirage13–40.0241%15 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.099%14 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0418%14 Aug →
nuke11–130.0325%13 Aug →
inferno0–13-0.070%13 Aug →
ancient10–130.0417%13 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0411%13 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0916%13 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0824%13 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0019%13 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0620%13 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0425%13 Aug →
mirage13–30.0714%11 Aug →
cache13–70.0221%11 Aug →
mirage13–60.0421%11 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0717%1 Aug →
dust24–13-0.078%1 Aug →
mirage13–90.0225%1 Aug →
anubis13–40.1021%31 Jul →
dust29–130.0832%31 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0332%31 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0817%31 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0126%31 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0327%31 Jul →
cache5–130.0219%31 Jul →
anubis13–80.0122%30 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0028%30 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0812%27 Jul →
nuke16–130.0218%27 Jul →
nuke13–1-0.030%27 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0427%27 Jul →
inferno13–50.0922%26 Jul →
anubis13–80.0918%26 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.