Bread404

Bread404 — CS2 Stats

IE76561198849955660[U:1:889689932]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,631Tracked matches73%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,585Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,445Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33907 of 220911 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,631 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 31 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,445 +1,834 31 May16 Sept · 20 days played
21,30225,000peak 25,00031 May16 Sept
25,102Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-05-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,555 below peak (25,000)
  • +1,303 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,555 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 3 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=35,202), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate36.1%47.0%49.2%13.1% short
Shot accuracy15.6%13.0%13.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.981.081.120.14 short
Match win rate44.4%46.7%48.5%4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBread404PREMIER23,445 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning54
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50428Last 10050%Win rateWWTLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.8pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 10

  • 721 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility3.7
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch5.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.4
Utility3.7
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time613ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy12.1%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 12.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 8–8 · debris, 22 Aug
43%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 31 May
406msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 30 Jun
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 12 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W2Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 42% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25131252%0.01
infernoC24101442%0.01
cacheA1912763%0.00
dust2C167944%-0.00
anubisS64267%0.01
overpass4040%-0.01
nuke21150%-0.04
ancient220100%0.03
debris1010%0.15
vertigo110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

76,203Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
4,298Matches
44.4%Match win rate
36.1%Headshot %
15.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Pink band
9,039MVPs
1,585Hours (in match)
3,919Bombs planted
1,220Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,980
AWP4,267
MP91,698
MAC-101,235
AUG1,218

Lifetime map wins

8,752inferno
2,415dust2
2,355vertigo
1,744train
1,229nuke
290lake
228cbble
159office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

111Matches
58%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
85.0ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo2665%1.1516.0
Anubis2060%1.0715.8
Inferno1850%1.1717.4
Mirage1850%1.1316.4
Ancient967%1.0918.9
Cache875%1.3021.1
Dust2633%0.8513.3
Overpass250%1.1021.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.9%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
622msReaction time
30.6%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
2.6%Flash assists
9.79HE damage / grenade
3.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.884% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3342 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6363% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–110.0016%28 Aug
nuke9–1-0.010%22 Aug
debris8–80.1515%22 Aug
inferno1–9-0.1527%22 Aug
mirage11–13-0.055%27 Jul
cache13–7-0.0516%24 Jul
cache13–40.0310%19 Jul
ancient16–14-0.016%19 Jul
mirage13–70.0211%19 Jul
mirage13–20.084%19 Jul
cache25–210.0313%16 Jul
cache13–40.0415%16 Jul
mirage13–50.0614%16 Jul
inferno13–90.0615%15 Jul
dust27–13-0.0133%12 Jul
mirage10–130.024%12 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0111%12 Jul
cache13–7-0.0117%12 Jul
mirage5–13-0.077%12 Jul
cache5–13-0.0817%12 Jul
cache16–13-0.079%12 Jul
inferno13–00.0613%12 Jul
inferno13–40.087%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.086%11 Jul
mirage13–90.0713%11 Jul
mirage13–70.058%11 Jul
inferno13–40.0213%11 Jul
dust213–00.064%11 Jul
mirage8–130.0222%11 Jul
cache13–70.047%11 Jul
inferno13–00.1014%11 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0317%9 Jul
cache13–00.0415%9 Jul
inferno7–130.0517%9 Jul
cache11–130.0114%9 Jul
inferno12–120.0713%8 Jul
mirage8–130.058%8 Jul
cache13–60.119%8 Jul
cache5–13-0.026%7 Jul
cache12–12-0.0113%7 Jul
cache12–12-0.0413%7 Jul
cache12–12-0.009%7 Jul
overpass6–13-0.0310%5 Jul
dust27–13-0.0314%5 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0413%4 Jul
dust29–130.0014%4 Jul
mirage13–100.0620%4 Jul
dust29–13-0.026%4 Jul
dust23–130.0026%4 Jul
mirage13–70.0313%4 Jul
dust215–15-0.0310%3 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0717%3 Jul
mirage9–13-0.028%3 Jul
inferno16–130.069%3 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0011%2 Jul
overpass3–13-0.0413%2 Jul
inferno3–130.0322%2 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0421%1 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0116%1 Jul
anubis13–80.0611%30 Jun
mirage11–130.037%30 Jun
inferno11–130.0124%30 Jun
inferno3–13-0.046%30 Jun
overpass8–13-0.063%29 Jun
anubis14–16-0.0212%29 Jun
mirage13–8-0.024%29 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0215%29 Jun
inferno16–14-0.018%29 Jun
dust213–110.0223%28 Jun
inferno13–110.0716%28 Jun
mirage13–40.0615%28 Jun
dust27–130.0118%28 Jun
mirage5–130.0226%24 Jun
dust213–90.0213%24 Jun
inferno13–110.0216%24 Jun
dust27–130.0114%22 Jun
mirage13–60.0813%22 Jun
anubis13–90.0214%22 Jun
inferno11–130.0112%22 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0117%20 Jun
vertigo13–80.0218%20 Jun
anubis6–13-0.057%19 Jun
cache13–40.0622%19 Jun
anubis13–60.0218%18 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0316%18 Jun
cache13–10-0.0020%14 Jun
dust213–70.0611%14 Jun
mirage7–13-0.037%13 Jun
ancient13–80.066%13 Jun
cache11–13-0.027%5 Jun
dust213–10-0.0110%5 Jun
nuke5–13-0.076%4 Jun
inferno2–13-0.069%4 Jun
dust213–7-0.0219%4 Jun
mirage13–100.0613%4 Jun
anubis13–90.069%3 Jun
dust213–110.0218%3 Jun
inferno4–130.0022%1 Jun
overpass11–130.0818%31 May
dust21–13-0.1143%31 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →