Darius [ZF]

Darius [ZF] — CS2 Stats

76561198042126735[U:1:81861007]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

428Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,677Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 428 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 8 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,124 +5,374 24 Jun6 Jul · 10 days played
9,75015,124peak 15,12424 Jun6 Jul
15,124Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-03-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,988), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate45.0%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy19.1%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.320.991.02above
Match win rate75.3%43.9%44.7%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 5 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDarius [ZF]FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning56
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51427Last 10051%Win rateWLWWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 666ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 665ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.3
Utility5.1
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.6
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time651ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 18 Jul
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · vertigo, 5 Jul
484msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · mirage, 3 Jul
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 11 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 59% over 17anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA33191458%0.02
dust2A1710759%0.01
infernoB157847%0.02
cacheC146843%-0.00
overpassD62433%0.01
anubisD61517%-0.01
ancient42250%0.03
vertigo220100%-0.01
nuke220100%0.09
train1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

92,353Lifetime kills
1.32K/D · Top 10% of Level 4 players
8,442Matches
75.3%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 4 players
45.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
19.1%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 4 players
10,142MVPs
1,677Hours (in match)
2,195Bombs planted
975Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,502
AWP13,349
P2501,938
FAMAS1,677
UMP-451,537

Lifetime map wins

4,375inferno
3,170dust2
1,985nuke
1,691train
1,490cbble
417vertigo
336lake
248dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
657msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
7.36HE damage / grenade
6.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5764% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–90.0113%1 Aug
train8–13-0.035%18 Jul
inferno5–00.150%18 Jul
mirage13–30.1825%18 Jul
cache8–130.0521%18 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0512%18 Jul
cache13–5-0.0415%15 Jul
inferno3–130.0023%12 Jul
cache13–7-0.0126%12 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0612%12 Jul
cache16–12-0.0113%11 Jul
mirage8–130.0316%11 Jul
cache13–7-0.0225%11 Jul
inferno13–00.0211%11 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0311%8 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0524%8 Jul
ancient13–110.0514%6 Jul
dust213–30.1020%6 Jul
mirage6–130.0023%6 Jul
dust213–100.0115%6 Jul
dust213–80.0618%6 Jul
mirage13–90.1312%6 Jul
dust213–80.0320%5 Jul
dust213–10.0629%5 Jul
mirage13–60.0127%5 Jul
vertigo13–20.0036%5 Jul
mirage8–130.0423%4 Jul
dust29–13-0.0324%4 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0012%4 Jul
dust29–13-0.0814%4 Jul
cache12–12-0.0223%4 Jul
cache11–13-0.0213%3 Jul
mirage13–80.1027%3 Jul
mirage13–20.1220%2 Jul
inferno13–80.069%2 Jul
inferno13–50.1413%2 Jul
dust213–70.1620%2 Jul
inferno7–13-0.059%1 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0129%1 Jul
nuke13–70.0512%1 Jul
overpass13–00.0423%1 Jul
nuke13–30.1326%1 Jul
mirage13–00.1024%1 Jul
dust211–130.0219%1 Jul
mirage16–130.0721%1 Jul
inferno13–50.0928%30 Jun
mirage5–00.1535%30 Jun
mirage13–10.1126%30 Jun
ancient13–40.1512%30 Jun
mirage13–70.0222%30 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0412%29 Jun
overpass7–130.0222%29 Jun
dust213–110.0319%29 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0719%29 Jun
mirage13–60.1013%28 Jun
mirage9–130.0212%28 Jun
dust27–13-0.0323%28 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0321%28 Jun
mirage13–100.0227%27 Jun
dust213–90.0120%24 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0728%24 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0411%24 Jun
mirage8–13-0.1131%24 Jun
dust26–13-0.0519%23 Jun
dust27–13-0.0313%22 Jun
mirage13–60.0114%22 Jun
anubis13–90.0426%22 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0315%22 Jun
mirage13–60.0419%22 Jun
cache12–12-0.0416%21 Jun
overpass12–120.0210%21 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0224%20 Jun
vertigo13–8-0.034%20 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0217%19 Jun
cache7–130.0219%16 Jun
cache13–100.0415%14 Jun
dust213–7-0.049%14 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0516%13 Jun
cache2–13-0.036%13 Jun
inferno9–60.1133%13 Jun
cache11–13-0.0118%5 Jun
dust213–100.0223%5 Jun
overpass12–120.0119%5 Jun
cache5–130.0211%5 Jun
mirage13–9-0.022%1 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0214%1 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0213%30 May
anubis11–13-0.0015%30 May
mirage11–130.0212%9 May
dust214–16-0.0411%9 May
inferno6–13-0.064%9 May
ancient7–13-0.0417%9 May
overpass13–5-0.0111%9 May
ancient11–13-0.0314%7 May
mirage13–90.0220%7 May
inferno7–13-0.0614%7 May
anubis12–160.0221%24 Mar
anubis12–12-0.0318%14 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0218%14 Mar
inferno8–130.009%8 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →