Meo bi ngoo

Meo bi ngoo — CS2 Stats

76561198846306412[U:1:886040684]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

177Tracked matches66%Win rate2023Tracked since
326Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 54 days played since 14 Jun 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,617 +3,822 14 Jun12 Dec · 27 days played
12,31919,443peak 19,44314 Jun12 Dec
19,443Peak Premier in tracked matches
54Days played since 2024-06-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning47
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47494Last 10047%Win rateWLLWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.5pp headshot accuracy · −93ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility4.5
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.7
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time657ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 718ms → last ⅓ avg 657ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–0 · nuke, 16 Oct
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · mirage, 25 Feb
453msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · mirage, 31 Oct
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 16 Oct

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
117In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 18% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB32161650%-0.01
dust2D1731418%-0.02
infernoA149564%-0.02
ancientA106460%-0.03
nukeC83538%-0.01
anubisS75271%-0.03
overpassD51420%-0.02
vertigo42250%0.01
train32167%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

23,005Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
866Matches
44.5%Match win rate
35.9%Headshot %
13.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
2,086MVPs
326Hours (in match)
968Bombs planted
292Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,659dust2
1,555inferno
283nuke
189vertigo
101train
29assault
23office
22italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
20%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
82.6ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

12%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage40%0.7917.0
Anubis1100%0.9110.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
642msReaction time
24.6%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
6.06HE damage / grenade
10.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4717 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.6038% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient16–120.1023%3 May
dust214–160.0528%3 May
dust26–130.0115%30 Apr
mirage13–100.0720%30 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0220%12 Dec
dust29–13-0.0215%12 Dec
overpass11–13-0.0319%18 Nov
mirage13–60.0133%31 Oct
mirage13–10-0.0324%31 Oct
mirage6–13-0.0227%28 Oct
mirage13–30.0216%27 Oct
dust215–15-0.0028%27 Oct
dust24–13-0.1022%27 Oct
overpass13–40.1337%16 Oct
dust213–110.0225%16 Oct
ancient13–9-0.0341%16 Oct
nuke13–00.2141%16 Oct
inferno13–8-0.0220%15 Oct
ancient13–4-0.0022%15 Oct
dust213–90.0727%14 Oct
mirage13–100.0221%14 Oct
mirage4–13-0.0527%7 Oct
inferno13–110.0020%30 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0125%30 Sept
overpass8–13-0.0518%30 Sept
dust22–130.0220%28 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0110%21 Sept
train13–10-0.0810%20 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0517%20 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0612%2 Sept
nuke10–13-0.1023%2 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0721%2 Sept
dust29–13-0.0218%2 Sept
nuke15–150.0016%2 Sept
overpass10–13-0.0618%2 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0313%30 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0317%26 Aug
overpass3–13-0.0712%25 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0419%25 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0626%22 Aug
mirage13–160.0715%18 Aug
mirage13–110.0521%11 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0512%5 Aug
dust27–13-0.0518%4 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0141%2 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0118%28 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0333%25 May
nuke10–13-0.0614%25 May
inferno8–13-0.0128%18 May
mirage10–10.0822%16 May
mirage8–13-0.0919%1 May
dust21–13-0.1422%1 May
mirage6–13-0.1217%1 May
inferno13–10-0.0710%30 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0117%29 Apr
dust211–13-0.0515%23 Apr
ancient4–13-0.078%23 Apr
dust211–13-0.0725%23 Apr
anubis13–110.0010%18 Apr
mirage0–60.0036%18 Apr
dust23–13-0.0914%17 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0616%17 Apr
train13–10-0.0815%17 Apr
train5–13-0.0022%16 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0515%9 Apr
mirage7–3-0.0922%9 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0218%9 Apr
ancient4–13-0.1014%12 Mar
inferno8–13-0.129%12 Mar
mirage2–13-0.1217%12 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0113%10 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0617%10 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0518%5 Mar
mirage13–70.0533%5 Mar
nuke13–60.0143%5 Mar
mirage13–11-0.1016%4 Mar
mirage13–110.0318%4 Mar
dust213–9-0.100%4 Mar
anubis13–4-0.0020%4 Mar
ancient13–11-0.0523%1 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0818%1 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0938%1 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0619%25 Feb
mirage0–3-0.0050%25 Feb
mirage6–130.0129%5 Feb
dust212–120.0716%5 Feb
inferno13–50.0616%2 Feb
dust29–130.0336%23 Jan
mirage13–60.0316%29 Aug
mirage11–130.0113%25 Aug
vertigo13–80.0217%27 Jul
inferno13–80.0716%12 Jul
vertigo13–40.0911%12 Jul
vertigo9–13-0.0018%26 Jun
nuke4–13-0.1011%26 Jun
inferno15–150.0120%21 Jun
vertigo11–13-0.0528%21 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0220%20 Jun
mirage13–40.0520%14 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0521%14 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →