Stewie Griefin

Stewie Griefin — CS2 Stats

DE76561198835668047[U:1:875402319]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,183Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
947Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,807Purple band · top ~17.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (43 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 17,807 → 17,807
+3Tracked matches · now 1,183
−1.7ppWin rate · 48.1% → 46.4%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,807 -2,192 18 Jul – 20 Sept · 21 days played
17,80719,999peak 19,99918 Jul20 Sept
20,110Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2026-07-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,192 below peak (19,999)
  • -584 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,193 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate52.3%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy6.1%13.2%13.7%7.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.841.071.090.24 short
Match win rate40.6%46.9%48.4%7.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStewie GriefinFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER17,807 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning59
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateLWLTLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +9.7pp headshot accuracy · +85ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility2.4
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch5.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.9
Utility2.4
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time570ms−79ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 24 Jul →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · cache, 16 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 31 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 16 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 68% over 19anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D247–1729%-0.03
infernoB2111–1052%-0.01
ancientS1913–668%-0.00
cacheC146–843%0.00
mirageB84–450%-0.02
anubisD61–517%-0.06
nukeA53–260%-0.01
train—20–20%0.05
vertigo—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,657Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
2,636Matches
40.6%Match win rate
52.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
6.1%Shot accuracy
7,628MVPs
947Hours (in match)
1,588Bombs planted
873Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,981inferno
3,939dust2
1,705nuke
1,279vertigo
738train
336cbble
45lake
13italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

335Matches
56%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
81.0ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust28458%1.0815.8
Inferno5859%1.0816.3
Ancient5553%1.0515.6
Mirage4941%0.9815.7
Anubis4372%1.1817.3
Nuke2357%0.9414.2
Vertigo1258%0.8916.3
Overpass10%0.8416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
86.1%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
564msReaction time
32.4%T opening success
46.4%CT opening success
0.21Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
13.07HE damage / grenade
1.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2094 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.3545% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0437%13 Oct →
inferno13–50.0144%13 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0817%12 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0329%9 Sept →
cache4–130.0133%8 Sept →
inferno13–80.0230%8 Sept →
nuke11–130.0532%6 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0616%6 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0427%6 Sept →
dust214–160.0316%5 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0215%4 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0316%4 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0215%4 Sept →
inferno7–130.0522%4 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0123%31 Aug →
cache10–130.0420%31 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0223%31 Aug →
ancient13–110.0319%31 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0213%30 Aug →
cache9–130.0018%30 Aug →
dust27–130.0214%30 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0434%30 Aug →
inferno13–90.0720%27 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0313%27 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0219%24 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0314%24 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0117%23 Aug →
mirage13–90.0621%23 Aug →
train12–120.0319%22 Aug →
train11–130.0618%22 Aug →
inferno22–20-0.0210%21 Aug →
dust212–12-0.068%21 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0227%21 Aug →
cache6–130.1128%21 Aug →
inferno13–90.0730%21 Aug →
dust23–8-0.0823%21 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0224%19 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0418%19 Aug →
ancient5–130.0423%19 Aug →
cache8–130.0318%19 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0550%19 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0517%17 Aug →
ancient13–50.0420%17 Aug →
inferno13–50.0518%16 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0815%12 Aug →
cache13–90.0326%12 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0211%12 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0714%10 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0520%9 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0217%9 Aug →
ancient16–140.0219%8 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0221%8 Aug →
dust213–80.0121%8 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0223%8 Aug →
inferno13–70.0117%8 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0518%7 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.049%7 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0233%5 Aug →
ancient13–70.0321%5 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0515%2 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0027%1 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0415%1 Aug →
dust213–90.0221%31 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0414%26 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0343%26 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0418%26 Jul →
inferno12–16-0.0819%25 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0141%25 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0017%25 Jul →
cache13–40.0128%24 Jul →
ancient13–60.1314%24 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0329%23 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0524%23 Jul →
cache13–70.0123%23 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0221%23 Jul →
inferno14–16-0.0117%22 Jul →
nuke16–13-0.0414%19 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0815%18 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0415%18 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.066%18 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0814%16 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0514%16 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.107%16 Jul →
dust28–13-0.1010%16 Jul →
ancient13–60.0516%16 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0515%16 Jul →
cache13–00.00100%16 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0526%16 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.094%15 Jul →
mirage14–160.0119%14 Jul →
inferno15–15-0.0120%14 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0815%14 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0218%13 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0121%13 Jul →
ancient13–110.0617%13 Jul →
anubis13–4-0.0515%12 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0639%12 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0113%10 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0419%10 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0013%10 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.