≋Flåm≋

≋Flåm≋ — CS2 Stats

VG76561198827596552[U:1:867330824]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,578Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,209Hours in CS43Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,885Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#88851 of 261547 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,353 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,885 +4,510 8 Jun – 11 Nov · 16 days played
15,00020,106peak 20,1068 Jun11 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,353 +0 24 Sept – 26 Sept · 2 observations
1,3531,353peak 1,35324 Sept26 Sept
20,106Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,353Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
56Days played since 2026-06-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,353
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 178 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-24
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 221 below peak (20,106)
  • +181 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 115 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-24
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate54.0%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy3.1%13.0%13.2%10.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.181.061.07above
Match win rate47.2%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG≋Flåm≋FACEITLevel 8 · 1,353 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,885 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,353csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning55
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD58–39–3Last 10058%Win rateLLLLWLWLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −70pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate down 70pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility3.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 34% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.5
Utility3.6
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time561ms−106ms
first ⅓ avg 667ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 18 Jun →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · cache, 12 Jul →
352msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 20 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 21 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L4Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 91% over 11anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB2411–1346%0.01
cacheS1812–667%0.03
infernoB168–850%0.03
mirageS1110–191%0.07
nukeA95–456%-0.02
dust2C83–538%0.00
anubisD62–433%0.01
vertigoS65–183%0.03
overpass—11–0100%-0.02
train—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

64,208Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,016Matches
47.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
54.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
3.1%Shot accuracy
6,987MVPs
1,197Hours (in match)
2,918Bombs planted
1,170Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,172
AWP2,799
FAMAS1,946
MP91,737
Knife1,736

Lifetime map wins

4,071inferno
3,300nuke
2,311vertigo
2,175dust2
480train
213cbble
101office
81lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,414Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
73.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage42950%1.0814.7
Ancient28856%1.0114.4
Anubis16749%0.9615.0
Inferno15946%1.0014.4
Nuke13347%1.0014.8
Dust212144%0.9614.1
Vertigo5558%0.8813.8
Overpass2548%0.9615.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
70.0%Counter-strafing
12.9°Preaim
555msReaction time
57.0%T opening success
33.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
6.03HE damage / grenade
4.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.9436° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno14–16-0.0419%13 Nov →
anubis6–13-0.0511%12 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.0316%11 Nov →
dust28–130.0418%11 Nov →
cache13–8-0.0110%11 Nov →
nuke3–13-0.0218%8 Nov →
dust213–6-0.0017%8 Nov →
inferno11–13-0.0315%8 Nov →
dust211–130.0219%7 Nov →
nuke12–12-0.0124%7 Nov →
ancient16–13-0.0212%3 Nov →
vertigo9–70.0222%3 Nov →
vertigo9–4-0.0418%3 Nov →
ancient13–9-0.0224%29 Oct →
anubis13–90.0119%23 Oct →
mirage13–30.0612%23 Oct →
dust213–20.0620%18 Oct →
cache13–110.0120%17 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0543%14 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0613%12 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0717%12 Oct →
mirage13–90.0620%4 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0420%3 Oct →
ancient13–50.0511%3 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0212%2 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0418%21 Sept →
overpass13–8-0.0210%19 Sept →
ancient13–100.0417%18 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0428%11 Sept →
ancient2–8-0.0533%7 Sept →
cache13–40.1228%1 Sept →
dust26–13-0.068%31 Aug →
ancient13–100.0524%30 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0420%30 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0326%29 Aug →
vertigo13–60.0119%28 Aug →
inferno13–90.0122%28 Aug →
ancient9–130.0018%27 Aug →
ancient3–70.0327%23 Aug →
mirage7–10.1027%23 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0529%22 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0129%22 Aug →
inferno15–150.0419%22 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0120%21 Aug →
cache13–10.1333%21 Aug →
inferno13–90.1019%21 Aug →
inferno13–60.0127%20 Aug →
cache8–130.0620%20 Aug →
dust213–30.0215%19 Aug →
inferno13–90.0528%19 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.039%8 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0713%30 Jul →
nuke13–20.0014%30 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0224%23 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0315%22 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0126%21 Jul →
ancient6–130.1733%20 Jul →
mirage13–90.0844%20 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0039%20 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0215%19 Jul →
mirage13–40.1431%16 Jul →
inferno8–130.0217%15 Jul →
cache13–100.0744%12 Jul →
dust23–130.0132%9 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0219%9 Jul →
cache13–100.0525%9 Jul →
ancient13–20.0210%9 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0035%9 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0021%8 Jul →
nuke10–30.0532%8 Jul →
cache8–130.0719%5 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0422%25 Jun →
cache4–13-0.0317%23 Jun →
anubis3–130.0122%23 Jun →
mirage13–50.1424%23 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.0221%23 Jun →
ancient13–80.0519%22 Jun →
cache7–130.0331%21 Jun →
train13–11-0.0116%21 Jun →
ancient7–130.0628%21 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0430%21 Jun →
vertigo11–13-0.0122%20 Jun →
vertigo13–100.0322%20 Jun →
cache13–90.0222%20 Jun →
cache10–13-0.0421%20 Jun →
ancient13–60.1228%19 Jun →
nuke13–9-0.0421%18 Jun →
ancient13–30.0636%18 Jun →
vertigo13–60.1714%18 Jun →
inferno13–20.1623%18 Jun →
inferno9–60.1024%18 Jun →
inferno9–10.1923%18 Jun →
nuke3–13-0.0718%17 Jun →
anubis12–120.0922%16 Jun →
cache13–30.1227%16 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.0025%9 Jun →
mirage13–30.1031%9 Jun →
inferno11–130.0121%8 Jun →
mirage13–50.1018%8 Jun →
anubis13–160.0421%7 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.