Greven

Greven — CS2 Stats

SE76561198815482666[U:1:855216938]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,090Tracked matches52%Win rate2024Tracked since
5,510Hours in CS60Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.3 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating2,768Grey band · top ~88.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 22 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 2,768 +753 22 Aug23 Sept · 28 days played
1,4973,069peak 3,06922 Aug23 Sept
3,202Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-08-22

Premier CS Rating

  • 301 below peak (3,069)
  • +80 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 2,232 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 1 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,156), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 1 medianLevel 2 medianvs Level 2
Headshot rate27.9%40.9%41.3%13.4% short
Shot accuracy0.0%14.2%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.590.950.950.36 short
Match win rate41.9%42.1%42.5%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 2 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 2 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGrevenFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER2,768 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim19
Positioning60
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41572Last 10041%Win rateLLLWWTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −4.1pp headshot accuracy · +35ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 675ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 675ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim1.9
Utility3.6
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch5.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 52% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 53% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 679ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 63% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim1.9
Positioning6.0
Utility3.6
Mechanics2.9
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact5.6

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time674ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 674ms
Headshot accuracy10.8%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 12.3% → last ⅓ avg 10.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 19 Sept
26%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · ancient, 29 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 28 Aug
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 18 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 56% over 16mirageWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC1981142%-0.04
dust2B179853%-0.04
anubisA169756%-0.03
ancientC1661038%-0.04
nukeB157847%-0.04
mirageD91811%-0.05
cacheD81713%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

56,217Lifetime kills
0.59K/D
5,556Matches
41.9%Match win rate
27.9%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
6,251MVPs
2,229Hours (in match)
5,202Bombs planted
793Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-479,427
AWP7,061
AUG6,840
Negev6,438
MAC-102,883
SCAR-201,839
P901,723

Lifetime map wins

8,870dust2
8,077inferno
6,634nuke
4,434vertigo
473train
14office
13italy
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

83Matches
35%Win rate
0.53Avg K/D
54.1ADR
30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22236%0.518.6
Mirage2050%0.619.8
Anubis1217%0.488.3
Inferno1127%0.507.8
Ancient1040%0.539.4
Vertigo425%0.274.0
Nuke333%0.8912.3
Train10%0.478.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.9%Headshot accuracy
28.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
62.9%Counter-strafing
13.6°Preaim
679msReaction time
53.3%T opening success
36.7%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
8.60HE damage / grenade
2.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.617° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.9218% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.6699 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.056%23 Sept
nuke9–130.005%23 Sept
dust22–13-0.116%23 Sept
dust213–9-0.0514%23 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0110%22 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0410%22 Sept
ancient16–14-0.0111%22 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0111%22 Sept
dust213–60.032%22 Sept
dust27–13-0.0411%21 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0114%21 Sept
inferno16–12-0.018%21 Sept
anubis13–90.068%21 Sept
inferno13–110.038%21 Sept
anubis7–13-0.1416%19 Sept
anubis1–13-0.0923%19 Sept
cache0–10-0.0711%19 Sept
dust213–7-0.0620%19 Sept
inferno13–6-0.059%19 Sept
anubis13–90.069%19 Sept
dust213–100.0116%19 Sept
nuke13–100.0012%19 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0311%19 Sept
inferno6–13-0.056%18 Sept
ancient4–13-0.079%18 Sept
dust21–13-0.0918%18 Sept
anubis13–20.026%18 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0822%18 Sept
dust214–16-0.102%17 Sept
cache5–13-0.0724%17 Sept
nuke4–13-0.090%17 Sept
nuke2–13-0.116%17 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0213%16 Sept
mirage2–13-0.080%15 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0515%15 Sept
inferno7–13-0.110%12 Sept
dust213–7-0.0713%12 Sept
nuke10–13-0.115%12 Sept
ancient16–12-0.0312%12 Sept
mirage13–110.0411%12 Sept
anubis13–16-0.027%11 Sept
dust213–90.056%11 Sept
inferno5–13-0.029%10 Sept
ancient13–100.0219%10 Sept
ancient10–13-0.092%9 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0312%9 Sept
mirage5–13-0.105%7 Sept
inferno10–13-0.054%6 Sept
mirage8–13-0.097%5 Sept
nuke13–6-0.017%5 Sept
ancient8–13-0.048%5 Sept
inferno5–13-0.107%4 Sept
dust213–7-0.0110%4 Sept
cache3–13-0.0014%4 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0621%4 Sept
ancient5–130.0312%2 Sept
dust28–13-0.1011%1 Sept
dust23–13-0.095%31 Aug
cache8–13-0.086%31 Aug
nuke11–13-0.069%31 Aug
mirage7–130.013%31 Aug
inferno13–10-0.049%29 Aug
anubis13–3-0.007%29 Aug
cache8–13-0.1010%29 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0926%29 Aug
nuke1–9-0.050%29 Aug
ancient6–130.0319%29 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0811%28 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0611%28 Aug
mirage10–13-0.039%28 Aug
dust28–13-0.0014%28 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0411%28 Aug
inferno5–13-0.054%28 Aug
dust26–13-0.038%28 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0412%28 Aug
anubis11–130.0416%28 Aug
dust213–20.019%28 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0113%28 Aug
anubis13–90.038%28 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0925%27 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0518%27 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0422%27 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0124%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.049%26 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0714%26 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0212%26 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0813%26 Aug
dust213–8-0.055%26 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0313%25 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0312%25 Aug
anubis13–9-0.007%25 Aug
cache13–110.0011%24 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0912%24 Aug
ancient3–13-0.1220%24 Aug
nuke8–13-0.019%24 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0415%24 Aug
anubis9–13-0.103%23 Aug
cache9–13-0.129%23 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0412%23 Aug
cache1–13-0.1017%22 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →