WHY DO I HEAR VOICES HELP ME

WHY DO I HEAR VOICES HELP ME — CS2 Stats

76561198809602562[U:1:849336834]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,555Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,775Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,572 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (44 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,572 → 2,572
+136Tracked matches · now 4,555
−13.3ppWin rate · 60.0% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,572 +0 28 Aug – 3 Sept · 3 observations
2,5722,572peak 2,57228 Aug3 Sept
2,572Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-07-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,572
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 428 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,061), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate54.3%50.9%
Shot accuracy13.8%13.7%
Kill/death ratio0.951.09
Match win rate45.7%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWHY DO I HEAR VOICES HELP…FACEITLevel 10 · 2,572 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,572csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning67
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–48–3Last 10049%Win rateWWWLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.1pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility4.9
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.7
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time505ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 516ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.30Best match rating · 9–4 · poseidon, 14 Jul →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 26 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · anubis, 7 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 4 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 16nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC188–1044%0.02
dust2C177–1041%0.01
infernoA1610–663%0.04
anubisA138–562%0.02
nukeD103–730%0.02
ancientC94–544%-0.02
cacheC94–544%0.02
debris—44–0100%0.15
vertigo—20–20%0.02
eldorado—10–10%0.11
poseidon—11–0100%0.30

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

260,914Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
7,115Matches
45.7%Match win rate
54.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players
13.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players
21,514MVPs
7,775Hours (in match)
5,937Bombs planted
3,648Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47132,300
AWP26,400
Knife5,009
P2502,568
MP92,216

Lifetime map wins

17,025inferno
16,303dust2
5,644nuke
4,100vertigo
3,490train
600cbble
170lake
169office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,059Matches
50%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
81.9ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage85550%1.1416.8
Dust260452%1.1717.1
Ancient36551%1.1616.9
Inferno31251%1.1317.3
Anubis23145%1.1417.1
Nuke21045%1.0816.4
Vertigo9245%1.1317.9
Overpass5560%1.0516.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.0%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
509msReaction time
59.8%T opening success
40.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
11.4%Flash assists
7.32HE damage / grenade
7.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4965 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–90.0114%17 Oct →
nuke13–80.1023%10 Oct →
dust213–90.1021%7 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0313%6 Oct →
mirage16–140.0117%4 Oct →
mirage13–80.0416%4 Oct →
mirage13–70.0929%4 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0315%2 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.048%2 Oct →
nuke13–110.0223%2 Oct →
anubis13–80.1122%1 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0610%1 Oct →
inferno9–30.2520%1 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.0516%1 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0440%1 Oct →
dust211–130.0112%30 Sept →
dust213–30.0928%30 Sept →
mirage9–130.0623%30 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0028%29 Sept →
nuke9–130.0231%29 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0212%29 Sept →
mirage13–100.0526%29 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0220%29 Sept →
anubis7–130.0119%27 Sept →
ancient13–70.0714%27 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.043%27 Sept →
inferno10–130.0319%26 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0321%26 Sept →
inferno10–130.0819%26 Sept →
inferno13–70.0843%26 Sept →
vertigo11–130.0622%26 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0110%20 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.014%20 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0221%19 Sept →
nuke13–50.0326%18 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0514%18 Sept →
nuke10–130.0422%18 Sept →
cache13–70.0813%18 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0131%18 Sept →
anubis13–90.0116%16 Sept →
nuke8–130.0718%16 Sept →
inferno9–30.2529%16 Sept →
dust210–130.0825%16 Sept →
anubis10–130.0114%14 Sept →
mirage13–30.0926%14 Sept →
nuke7–130.0028%14 Sept →
dust213–100.0411%14 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0116%13 Sept →
mirage12–120.0214%12 Sept →
dust210–130.0217%12 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0316%11 Sept →
eldorado8–80.1114%10 Sept →
debris9–30.1310%10 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0125%10 Sept →
dust25–130.0412%8 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0523%8 Sept →
mirage12–120.0235%7 Sept →
mirage8–130.0412%7 Sept →
inferno13–160.0525%7 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0329%7 Sept →
anubis13–100.0317%7 Sept →
inferno13–60.0220%6 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0123%6 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0415%5 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0523%5 Sept →
mirage13–20.1620%4 Sept →
dust213–100.0418%31 Aug →
dust213–70.0219%30 Aug →
cache16–130.0220%29 Aug →
cache11–130.0216%29 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0110%27 Aug →
cache9–130.0220%23 Aug →
dust213–50.0126%23 Aug →
inferno13–100.0120%22 Aug →
anubis16–120.0623%21 Aug →
anubis13–80.1230%20 Aug →
cache1–13-0.0418%20 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0523%18 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0215%18 Aug →
inferno9–30.0625%13 Aug →
mirage14–160.0119%13 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0913%11 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0918%5 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0422%1 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0619%31 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.077%30 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.007%29 Jul →
ancient13–70.0124%24 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0313%22 Jul →
cache16–140.0615%20 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0310%17 Jul →
debris9–40.1518%14 Jul →
debris9–20.1927%14 Jul →
debris9–50.1327%14 Jul →
poseidon9–40.3017%14 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.120%14 Jul →
inferno9–60.0027%12 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0319%12 Jul →
inferno8–130.0040%12 Jul →
cache13–60.0725%7 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.