JOHN @ FRAG

JOHN @ FRAG — CS2 Stats

76561198057325155[U:1:97059427]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,609Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,510Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2817 of 14771 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,225 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJOHN @ FRAGFACEITLevel 10 · 2,225 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,510 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning59
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateWWWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression5.0
Utility6.2
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.9
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time538ms+0ms
first ⅓ avg 538ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy23.8%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.33Best rating — debris 9–1
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
410In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

poseidonBest map · 100% over 5mirageWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS1711665%0.00
cacheC167944%-0.00
anubisB147750%0.01
nukeA117464%-0.01
debrisB105550%0.09
mirageC83538%0.01
infernoB84450%0.03
poseidonS550100%0.12
eldoradoC52340%0.01
dust242250%0.02
train110100%0.11
vertigo1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,589Matches
51%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
78.6ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient47153%1.1416.6
Mirage30649%1.0415.4
Anubis29053%1.0815.9
Dust223541%1.0515.3
Nuke15348%1.0915.4
Inferno10446%1.0514.6
Overpass10153%1.1115.5
Train7951%1.1616.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
29.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.0%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
529msReaction time
27.2%T opening success
48.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
5.05HE damage / grenade
27.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.1664% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–10.0619%28 Aug
dust213–30.0044%28 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0026%27 Aug
mirage13–40.0724%26 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0513%26 Aug
inferno9–130.0139%26 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0810%25 Aug
ancient14–160.0124%24 Aug
anubis16–130.0324%23 Aug
anubis16–130.1518%23 Aug
dust27–13-0.0228%22 Aug
poseidon9–40.1741%22 Aug
eldorado8–80.0620%22 Aug
inferno13–100.0122%22 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0317%21 Aug
anubis16–12-0.0125%21 Aug
cache16–130.0236%20 Aug
inferno17–19-0.0718%19 Aug
cache13–20.0830%18 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0023%17 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0124%16 Aug
cache10–13-0.0227%16 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0522%16 Aug
cache6–130.0124%16 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0411%16 Aug
mirage5–130.0825%15 Aug
ancient10–130.0016%15 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0124%13 Aug
cache4–130.0920%12 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0128%12 Aug
cache13–16-0.0319%11 Aug
cache13–8-0.0119%11 Aug
nuke13–30.0527%10 Aug
train13–80.1126%9 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0121%9 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0017%9 Aug
anubis8–130.0115%5 Aug
anubis13–60.0525%5 Aug
cache6–13-0.0616%5 Aug
nuke3–13-0.1221%4 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0112%3 Aug
anubis13–80.0231%3 Aug
debris8–8-0.0417%2 Aug
eldorado9–50.0527%2 Aug
debris4–9-0.0219%1 Aug
debris4–90.0617%1 Aug
nuke13–40.0021%31 Jul
cache7–13-0.0331%31 Jul
inferno13–100.0034%30 Jul
nuke13–100.0915%30 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0324%30 Jul
ancient13–100.0224%29 Jul
nuke14–160.0221%29 Jul
dust211–130.0226%28 Jul
anubis13–90.039%25 Jul
cache9–13-0.0822%25 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0115%24 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0529%23 Jul
nuke13–110.0321%23 Jul
anubis6–130.0425%23 Jul
cache13–90.0118%21 Jul
ancient13–80.0222%17 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0618%17 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0411%16 Jul
cache4–13-0.0239%15 Jul
debris9–40.0025%14 Jul
debris9–20.1619%14 Jul
debris9–5-0.0113%14 Jul
debris9–10.3321%14 Jul
debris8–80.1022%13 Jul
eldorado9–50.1421%13 Jul
debris9–30.1522%13 Jul
debris8–80.1324%12 Jul
ancient13–110.0919%12 Jul
inferno13–30.2331%11 Jul
poseidon9–60.0928%10 Jul
cache3–130.0112%9 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0611%9 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0115%9 Jul
eldorado7–90.0135%9 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0522%9 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0329%9 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0624%9 Jul
ancient13–60.1241%9 Jul
cache13–60.0415%8 Jul
eldorado3–9-0.2318%8 Jul
cache13–8-0.0821%7 Jul
poseidon9–20.1833%7 Jul
cache13–60.0039%7 Jul
poseidon9–30.1142%5 Jul
ancient13–70.0532%4 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0410%4 Jul
inferno13–60.0316%4 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0019%2 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0014%1 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0317%29 Jun
inferno8–130.0425%29 Jun
mirage5–130.0115%29 Jun
poseidon9–30.0824%29 Jun
anubis13–60.0224%29 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →