m1GGi

m1GGi — CS2 Stats

AQ76561198809104464[U:1:848838736]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,550Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,933Hours in CS19Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,747Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#98548 of 251244 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,649 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,747 -1,253 2 Jun – 8 Oct · 22 days played
17,64521,428peak 21,4282 Jun8 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,649 +0 6 Sept – 20 Sept · 2 observations
1,6491,649peak 1,6496 Sept20 Sept
21,428Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,649Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-06-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,649
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 102 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,681 below peak (21,428)
  • +485 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,253 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches53——
Win rate53%——
K/D0.81——
Headshot %46%——

Measured 6 Sep 2026 → 11 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.4%48.2%50.9%5.5% short
Shot accuracy19.5%13.3%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.891.071.090.20 short
Match win rate44.2%46.9%48.4%4.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGm1GGiFACEITLevel 9 · 1,649 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER18,747 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,649csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning65
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–41–5Last 10054%Win rateWWWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · −50ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.1
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.5
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels6.9
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time556ms−79ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 14 Jul →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · cache, 10 Sept →
336msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · cache, 7 Jun →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 16 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 68% over 28infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2819–968%-0.01
mirageC219–1243%-0.01
ancientA2112–957%-0.00
dust2B157–847%-0.02
infernoC52–340%-0.04
nukeC52–340%-0.03
overpass—31–233%-0.01
anubis—11–0100%-0.02
alpine—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

141,427Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
5,081Matches
44.2%Match win rate
45.4%Headshot %
19.5%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 9 players
14,730MVPs
6,321Hours (in match)
3,783Bombs planted
2,239Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4746,781
AWP25,626
FAMAS2,861
Knife2,489
P2502,179

Lifetime map wins

11,263inferno
4,949dust2
2,765train
1,960nuke
1,297vertigo
968cbble
307office
45lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,040Matches
52%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
78.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5673%1.1315.1
Dust24154%0.9513.9
Mirage3244%1.3418.5
Inferno2945%1.1015.6
Overpass1856%1.1017.0
Cache1471%0.8513.4
Anubis1377%1.1017.6
Nuke1267%0.9813.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
553msReaction time
62.1%T opening success
53.0%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
10.36HE damage / grenade
5.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4225 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–6-0.0120%8 Oct →
mirage13–90.0122%8 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0618%8 Oct →
overpass5–130.0016%8 Oct →
ancient0–9-0.0511%8 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0313%6 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0313%6 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0125%6 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.0214%5 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.038%1 Oct →
mirage16–120.0817%1 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0912%28 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0116%28 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0912%28 Sept →
cache15–150.0127%23 Sept →
ancient13–30.0032%23 Sept →
mirage13–90.0313%22 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0711%21 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0524%21 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0510%21 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0518%17 Sept →
inferno13–50.0226%17 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0718%17 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0135%14 Sept →
dust27–13-0.019%14 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0222%14 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0431%10 Sept →
dust213–80.0022%10 Sept →
cache13–3-0.0536%10 Sept →
ancient9–130.0119%9 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0218%8 Sept →
ancient13–40.0721%8 Sept →
cache4–13-0.017%8 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0225%28 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0418%28 Aug →
cache10–130.1316%28 Aug →
dust213–8-0.077%28 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0018%28 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0118%27 Aug →
ancient15–150.0310%27 Aug →
ancient13–90.0224%27 Aug →
mirage13–30.0129%25 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0516%25 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.087%24 Aug →
mirage10–130.0122%24 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0135%24 Aug →
ancient13–40.1022%23 Aug →
cache16–120.0127%18 Aug →
cache13–70.0122%18 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0016%13 Aug →
ancient13–60.0314%13 Aug →
dust211–130.0120%13 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0225%1 Aug →
dust213–9-0.039%31 Jul →
nuke15–150.0018%28 Jul →
dust29–130.0112%27 Jul →
ancient13–100.0410%21 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0614%20 Jul →
cache13–50.0419%20 Jul →
mirage13–90.0222%20 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0414%14 Jul →
mirage13–50.1513%14 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.1014%13 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0231%12 Jul →
ancient13–90.0415%7 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0031%7 Jul →
cache13–90.1021%6 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0316%6 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0425%5 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0218%5 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0725%5 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0118%2 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0224%2 Jul →
dust213–80.0125%1 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0216%1 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0712%1 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.100%23 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0212%23 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0511%22 Jun →
mirage2–13-0.0824%22 Jun →
overpass13–9-0.0222%17 Jun →
cache13–90.0130%17 Jun →
cache13–0-0.0120%16 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0522%16 Jun →
cache13–11-0.0422%16 Jun →
overpass19–22-0.0318%15 Jun →
cache13–50.0525%14 Jun →
cache9–13-0.0326%14 Jun →
ancient13–10.0731%14 Jun →
alpine13–110.0322%12 Jun →
mirage15–15-0.0226%10 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0231%10 Jun →
cache7–13-0.0731%9 Jun →
cache13–8-0.0225%9 Jun →
cache8–13-0.0324%7 Jun →
mirage13–4-0.0016%7 Jun →
cache12–12-0.0114%7 Jun →
mirage11–130.0713%2 Jun →
ancient5–130.0321%2 Jun →
nuke13–100.017%2 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.