m1GGi

m1GGi — CS2 Stats

AQ76561198809104464[U:1:848838736]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,585Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,960Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,703Top 50% of 212,379 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#60031 of 259185 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,649 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,703 +4,058 28 Aug – 27 Oct · 27 days played
17,64522,307peak 22,30728 Aug27 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,649 +0 6 Sept – 20 Sept · 2 observations
1,6491,649peak 1,6496 Sept20 Sept
22,307Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,649Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-07-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,649
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 102 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 604 below peak (22,307)
  • +3,899 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,297 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.4%48.2%50.9%5.5% short
Shot accuracy19.4%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.891.071.090.20 short
Match win rate44.4%46.9%48.4%4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGm1GGiFACEITLevel 9 · 1,649 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,703 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,649csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning64
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–39–5Last 10056%Win rateWLWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · +51ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility4.9
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.4
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact8.6

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time524ms−85ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 14 Jul →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · cache, 10 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 17 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 21 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 20infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2312–1152%-0.01
ancientS2114–767%0.00
mirageC219–1243%-0.01
cacheS2015–575%0.00
infernoD62–433%0.01
nukeC52–340%-0.02
anubis—32–167%-0.00
overpass—10–10%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

142,108Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
5,117Matches
44.4%Match win rate
45.4%Headshot %
19.4%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 9 players
14,828MVPs
6,335Hours (in match)
3,817Bombs planted
2,249Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4747,036
AWP25,751
FAMAS2,862
Knife2,493
P2502,181

Lifetime map wins

11,297inferno
5,082dust2
2,765train
1,993nuke
1,297vertigo
968cbble
307office
45lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,043Matches
52%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
78.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5673%1.1315.1
Dust24255%0.9514.3
Mirage3244%1.3418.5
Inferno2945%1.1015.6
Overpass1856%1.1017.0
Cache1573%0.8413.2
Anubis1377%1.1017.6
Nuke1369%0.9913.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
517msReaction time
61.5%T opening success
49.2%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
11.91HE damage / grenade
4.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–70.0317%27 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0210%27 Oct →
dust213–90.0227%27 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0515%26 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0317%26 Oct →
ancient11–130.0316%26 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0220%26 Oct →
cache16–140.0817%25 Oct →
inferno9–130.0315%25 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.1010%25 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0113%24 Oct →
anubis13–70.0516%24 Oct →
inferno15–150.0910%24 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.074%24 Oct →
dust213–100.1020%22 Oct →
cache13–4-0.013%22 Oct →
nuke13–110.0431%22 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0321%22 Oct →
mirage13–00.0114%21 Oct →
dust216–140.0120%21 Oct →
anubis12–12-0.0519%21 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0217%20 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0219%19 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0120%19 Oct →
dust27–130.0126%19 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.069%15 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0218%15 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0932%15 Oct →
dust213–10.0612%13 Oct →
ancient8–00.0635%13 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0514%13 Oct →
ancient13–40.0122%12 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0120%8 Oct →
mirage13–90.0122%8 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0618%8 Oct →
overpass5–130.0016%8 Oct →
ancient0–9-0.0511%8 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0313%6 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0313%6 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0125%6 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.0214%5 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.038%1 Oct →
mirage16–120.0817%1 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0912%28 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0116%28 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0912%28 Sept →
cache15–150.0127%23 Sept →
ancient13–30.0032%23 Sept →
mirage13–90.0313%22 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0711%21 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0524%21 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0510%21 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0518%17 Sept →
inferno13–50.0226%17 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0718%17 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0135%14 Sept →
dust27–13-0.019%14 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0222%14 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0431%10 Sept →
dust213–80.0022%10 Sept →
cache13–3-0.0536%10 Sept →
ancient9–130.0119%9 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0218%8 Sept →
ancient13–40.0721%8 Sept →
cache4–13-0.017%8 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0225%28 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0418%28 Aug →
cache10–130.1316%28 Aug →
dust213–8-0.077%28 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0018%28 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0118%27 Aug →
ancient15–150.0310%27 Aug →
ancient13–90.0224%27 Aug →
mirage13–30.0129%25 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0516%25 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.087%24 Aug →
mirage10–130.0122%24 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0135%24 Aug →
ancient13–40.1022%23 Aug →
cache16–120.0127%18 Aug →
cache13–70.0122%18 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0016%13 Aug →
ancient13–60.0314%13 Aug →
dust211–130.0120%13 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0225%1 Aug →
dust213–9-0.039%31 Jul →
nuke15–150.0018%28 Jul →
dust29–130.0112%27 Jul →
ancient13–100.0410%21 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0614%20 Jul →
cache13–50.0419%20 Jul →
mirage13–90.0222%20 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0414%14 Jul →
mirage13–50.1513%14 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.1014%13 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0231%12 Jul →
ancient13–90.0415%7 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0031%7 Jul →
cache13–90.1021%6 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0316%6 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.