Nata

Nata — CS2 Stats

DE76561198035486137[U:1:75220409]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,787Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,953Purple band · top ~24.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,376 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,953 -2,988 2 Aug – 5 Oct · 28 days played
15,57718,941peak 18,9412 Aug5 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,376 +0 30 Aug – 19 Sept · 3 observations
1,3761,376peak 1,37630 Aug19 Sept
18,941Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,376Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-08-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,376
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 155 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,988 below peak (18,941)
  • -181 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,047 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNataFACEITLevel 7 · 1,376 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER15,953 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,376csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning56
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–54–4Last 10042%Win rateWLWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · +61ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 702ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 675ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility5.8
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.2

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 641ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning5.6
Utility5.8
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time642ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 674ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 4 Aug →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 21 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · dust2, 29 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 59% over 22nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2213–959%-0.01
dust2C197–1237%-0.03
mirageC198–1142%-0.03
cacheD144–1029%-0.04
anubisB84–450%-0.01
infernoB84–450%0.01
nukeD82–625%-0.03
overpass—20–20%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,689Matches
49%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
71.4ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient50154%1.0315.0
Mirage34146%0.9113.8
Inferno21449%0.8913.9
Anubis17551%1.0014.9
Dust217043%0.9313.2
Nuke13547%0.9514.3
Vertigo7247%1.0614.8
Overpass4461%0.9314.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
70.7%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
641msReaction time
47.6%T opening success
37.8%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
11.9%Flash assists
7.31HE damage / grenade
4.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.84% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–40.0521%5 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0321%5 Oct →
ancient13–100.0117%4 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.070%4 Oct →
anubis13–70.0618%4 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0618%4 Oct →
cache8–130.0117%4 Oct →
anubis13–60.0318%4 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0713%2 Oct →
dust210–13-0.1017%2 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0224%29 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.047%28 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0414%28 Sept →
inferno4–130.0116%28 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0130%28 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0316%24 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0720%24 Sept →
nuke13–90.0123%24 Sept →
cache15–150.0216%23 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0215%23 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0413%22 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0415%22 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0240%21 Sept →
nuke8–130.0120%21 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0713%21 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0525%18 Sept →
ancient9–10.1413%18 Sept →
mirage10–130.0116%17 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0313%17 Sept →
ancient8–130.079%16 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.044%16 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0213%16 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0813%16 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0524%16 Sept →
inferno13–30.0916%16 Sept →
ancient13–20.019%16 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0532%16 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0423%15 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0613%15 Sept →
cache6–2-0.099%15 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0316%15 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0012%14 Sept →
mirage13–70.0316%14 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0211%13 Sept →
inferno13–90.048%9 Sept →
mirage8–130.0211%9 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0220%8 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0416%8 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0336%7 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.005%7 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.079%7 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0113%6 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.026%6 Sept →
ancient13–60.0515%6 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.068%4 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0410%31 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0411%31 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0517%31 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0420%31 Aug →
inferno13–160.0111%26 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0924%26 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0413%24 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0221%24 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0020%23 Aug →
mirage4–3-0.0233%23 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0216%23 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0410%23 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.086%23 Aug →
dust213–30.0315%23 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.078%19 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.1125%19 Aug →
overpass4–13-0.090%19 Aug →
ancient0–2-0.030%19 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0230%19 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0417%18 Aug →
anubis12–12-0.0510%18 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0233%18 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0715%18 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0015%16 Aug →
inferno13–100.0537%16 Aug →
nuke13–80.0017%16 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0917%14 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0518%14 Aug →
overpass10–130.0524%13 Aug →
ancient13–60.0015%13 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0634%13 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0927%12 Aug →
cache13–80.0127%12 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0310%12 Aug →
ancient5–130.0113%11 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0818%9 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0816%8 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0411%8 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0512%7 Aug →
dust210–13-0.069%7 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0012%6 Aug →
ancient13–40.0126%5 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0413%4 Aug →
dust213–80.1429%4 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0311%2 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.