Nata

Nata — CS2 Stats

DE76561198035486137[U:1:75220409]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,755Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,086Purple band · top ~20.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,376 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 27 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,086 -2,120 28 Jul18 Sept · 24 days played
15,96519,851peak 19,85128 Jul18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,376 +0 30 Aug2 Sept · 2 observations
1,3761,376peak 1,37630 Aug2 Sept
19,851Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,376Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-07-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,376
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 155 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,765 below peak (19,851)
  • +74 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,914 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNataFACEITLevel 7 · 1,376 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,086 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,376csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning48
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45514Last 10045%Win rateLWLWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 663ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility5.8
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 648ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.8
Utility5.8
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time645ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 692ms → last ⅓ avg 645ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 4 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · cache, 29 Jul
453msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 16 Sept
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 16 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 7nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA22121055%-0.01
mirageB22101245%-0.03
dust2B20101050%-0.02
cacheC146843%-0.04
infernoA74357%0.01
anubisD72529%-0.06
nukeD61517%-0.04
overpass2020%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,673Matches
49%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
71.4ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient49654%1.0215.0
Mirage34146%0.9113.8
Inferno21249%0.8913.9
Anubis17152%1.0114.9
Dust216743%0.9313.2
Nuke13547%0.9514.3
Vertigo7247%1.0614.8
Overpass4461%0.9314.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.8%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
70.0%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
648msReaction time
34.6%T opening success
35.1%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
6.80HE damage / grenade
5.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.8312% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.6099% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–13-0.0525%18 Sept
ancient9–10.1413%18 Sept
mirage10–130.0116%17 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0313%17 Sept
ancient8–130.079%16 Sept
ancient3–13-0.044%16 Sept
dust211–13-0.0213%16 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0813%16 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0524%16 Sept
inferno13–30.0916%16 Sept
ancient13–20.019%16 Sept
cache6–13-0.0532%16 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0423%15 Sept
dust212–12-0.0613%15 Sept
cache6–2-0.099%15 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0316%15 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0012%14 Sept
mirage13–70.0316%14 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0211%13 Sept
inferno13–90.048%9 Sept
mirage8–130.0211%9 Sept
dust213–10-0.0220%8 Sept
cache13–11-0.0416%8 Sept
dust213–11-0.0336%7 Sept
mirage13–3-0.005%7 Sept
nuke11–13-0.079%7 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0113%6 Sept
mirage5–13-0.026%6 Sept
ancient13–60.0515%6 Sept
mirage8–13-0.068%4 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0410%31 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0411%31 Aug
cache9–13-0.0517%31 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0420%31 Aug
inferno13–160.0111%26 Aug
cache13–11-0.0924%26 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0413%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0221%24 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0020%23 Aug
mirage4–3-0.0233%23 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0216%23 Aug
dust29–13-0.0410%23 Aug
anubis4–13-0.086%23 Aug
dust213–30.0315%23 Aug
ancient7–13-0.078%19 Aug
mirage2–13-0.1125%19 Aug
overpass4–13-0.090%19 Aug
ancient0–2-0.030%19 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0230%19 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0417%18 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0510%18 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0233%18 Aug
cache5–13-0.0715%18 Aug
dust213–7-0.0015%16 Aug
inferno13–100.0537%16 Aug
nuke13–80.0017%16 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0917%14 Aug
dust24–13-0.0518%14 Aug
overpass10–130.0524%13 Aug
ancient13–60.0015%13 Aug
dust211–13-0.0634%13 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0927%12 Aug
cache13–80.0127%12 Aug
dust212–12-0.0310%12 Aug
ancient5–130.0113%11 Aug
cache5–13-0.0818%9 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0816%8 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0411%8 Aug
cache4–13-0.0512%7 Aug
dust210–13-0.069%7 Aug
cache11–13-0.0012%6 Aug
ancient13–40.0126%5 Aug
dust216–12-0.0413%4 Aug
dust213–80.1429%4 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0311%2 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0223%31 Jul
dust213–9-0.0118%31 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0323%31 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0624%31 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0412%31 Jul
dust29–13-0.039%31 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0611%31 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0029%30 Jul
anubis13–6-0.077%29 Jul
dust211–13-0.0614%29 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0119%29 Jul
dust213–7-0.0521%29 Jul
cache2–13-0.0550%29 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0013%28 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0117%28 Jul
dust213–80.0616%28 Jul
cache13–8-0.0122%28 Jul
dust28–13-0.0425%28 Jul
cache0–13-0.020%28 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0819%28 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0510%28 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0216%27 Jul
cache13–11-0.037%27 Jul
dust213–80.0425%27 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0724%27 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →