Knöppi

Knöppi — CS2 Stats

DE76561198279819564[U:1:319553836]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,737Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
9,270Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,359Top 10% of 204,097 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17693 of 251191 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,359 -3,340 6 Jun – 4 Oct · 24 days played
22,29229,436peak 29,4366 Jun4 Oct
29,436Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-06-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,077 below peak (29,436)
  • +3,067 over 30 days · improving
  • -1,906 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,641 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,318), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate51.3%49.2%50.7%meets
Shot accuracy20.0%13.4%11.8%above
Kill/death ratio0.981.121.180.20 short
Match win rate60.3%48.5%51.9%above

This profile matches the typical Gold band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Gold band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKnöppiPREMIER25,359 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim96
Positioning54
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–49–7Last 10044%Win rateWLWWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · −119ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 474ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim9.6
Utility5.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 96 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.6
Positioning5.4
Utility5.9
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact3.3

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time551ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 17 Jun →
64%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · mirage, 14 Aug →
422msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · mirage, 24 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 25 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 14infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3015–1550%0.01
ancientC207–1335%-0.00
cacheC166–1038%0.02
dust2A149–564%0.05
anubisC73–443%0.01
infernoD62–433%-0.04
nukeD62–433%0.01
overpass—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

341,284Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
14,792Matches
60.3%Match win rate · Top 10% of Red band
51.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Red band
20.0%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Red band
36,794MVPs
11,942Hours (in match)
12,779Bombs planted
4,621Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47106,035
AWP60,573
Knife6,239
P2504,302
FAMAS4,200

Lifetime map wins

22,170inferno
16,533dust2
4,595vertigo
4,339train
3,008cbble
2,950nuke
385office
230italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,506Matches
53%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
77.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient7951%1.0614.3
Anubis5347%0.9212.4
Overpass2060%0.8512.6
Mirage2050%1.1716.9
Dust21759%1.3417.2
Inferno1136%0.9112.7
Vertigo838%0.7712.8
Cache2100%1.8315.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
42.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.6%Spray accuracy
89.7%Counter-strafing
6.9°Preaim
555msReaction time
27.3%T opening success
55.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
12.14HE damage / grenade
14.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2651% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–100.006%4 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.0333%4 Oct →
anubis13–70.0822%4 Oct →
dust213–10.1726%26 Sept →
mirage16–140.0323%26 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.090%26 Sept →
inferno6–40.1024%26 Sept →
mirage11–130.1028%24 Sept →
nuke13–110.0221%24 Sept →
mirage8–130.0224%23 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0212%20 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0237%20 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0213%14 Sept →
mirage13–70.0715%14 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0621%8 Sept →
dust213–100.1126%8 Sept →
cache13–110.0437%8 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0456%8 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0619%8 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0116%8 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0420%8 Sept →
dust213–100.0736%8 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0724%7 Sept →
cache9–130.0041%7 Sept →
cache6–130.0129%7 Sept →
mirage4–30.168%23 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0722%22 Aug →
cache7–130.1120%22 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0638%22 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.024%20 Aug →
dust213–20.0946%20 Aug →
ancient7–130.0813%19 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0233%19 Aug →
anubis12–120.0724%18 Aug →
mirage13–100.0115%18 Aug →
cache5–130.0122%18 Aug →
anubis4–130.0021%16 Aug →
dust212–120.0116%16 Aug →
mirage11–130.0115%16 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0964%14 Aug →
cache9–130.0424%14 Aug →
ancient13–90.0218%14 Aug →
anubis13–2-0.0323%14 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0126%14 Aug →
dust213–90.0317%25 Jul →
nuke13–10.0118%25 Jul →
cache8–130.0126%25 Jul →
mirage16–130.0225%21 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0415%21 Jul →
dust213–50.0940%20 Jul →
ancient13–50.0714%20 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0320%20 Jul →
anubis9–130.0317%17 Jul →
ancient15–150.0120%17 Jul →
mirage8–130.0528%17 Jul →
mirage13–50.0833%17 Jul →
dust25–130.0120%15 Jul →
cache13–80.0527%15 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0521%15 Jul →
cache13–40.0613%13 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0225%12 Jul →
inferno11–130.1125%12 Jul →
mirage13–90.0022%12 Jul →
dust213–80.0725%11 Jul →
nuke4–130.0027%10 Jul →
cache13–60.0420%10 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0026%10 Jul →
mirage13–30.0414%10 Jul →
dust215–150.0121%10 Jul →
overpass12–120.0119%8 Jul →
mirage13–40.0133%8 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0521%8 Jul →
cache13–50.0228%8 Jul →
cache13–90.1023%6 Jul →
dust26–130.0743%6 Jul →
ancient5–130.0437%6 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0226%5 Jul →
dust213–50.0537%5 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.110%25 Jun →
anubis13–00.0143%25 Jun →
mirage16–120.0721%23 Jun →
nuke10–130.0524%22 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0425%22 Jun →
mirage2–130.0221%22 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0717%17 Jun →
inferno3–13-0.330%17 Jun →
ancient13–4-0.060%17 Jun →
ancient13–10.1821%17 Jun →
inferno13–110.0217%12 Jun →
nuke0–30.000%11 Jun →
anubis12–16-0.0623%11 Jun →
mirage10–130.0441%11 Jun →
ancient12–12-0.0819%10 Jun →
mirage13–2-0.0114%10 Jun →
cache2–13-0.1225%10 Jun →
mirage13–3-0.0750%10 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0328%10 Jun →
mirage6–130.0535%8 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0116%6 Jun →
mirage11–130.0123%6 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.