Robert I. — CS2 Stats

76561198043553722[U:1:83287994]✓ No bans

2,634Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,486Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.1 Developing
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,436 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.1%47.2%49.0%3.9% short
Shot accuracy16.1%12.3%13.1%above
Kill/death ratio0.891.071.080.19 short
Match win rate36.1%46.3%46.9%10.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRobert I.FACEITLevel 8 · 1,436 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning50
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58384Last 10058%Win rateTWLLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7
Aggression6.1
Utility3.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning5.0
Utility3.6
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time608ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — ancient 13–1
131Biggest win — cache
8Longest win streak
1310In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 17nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA25151060%-0.00
cacheA2011955%-0.02
mirageS1712571%-0.00
dust2B157847%-0.03
infernoS128467%-0.02
nukeD51420%-0.02
overpass32167%-0.05
anubis21150%-0.07
debris110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

162,218Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
8,614Matches
36.1%Match win rate
45.1%Headshot %
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
15,272MVPs
3,486Hours (in match)
5,721Bombs planted
1,781Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,841
AWP22,501
SSG 084,807
FAMAS3,436
UMP-452,209

Lifetime map wins

17,607dust2
8,889inferno
1,979nuke
1,727train
1,691vertigo
1,237cbble
258office
150lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,643Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
76.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient27756%1.0416.5
Inferno15750%0.9615.4
Dust213736%0.8413.5
Mirage10043%0.9014.5
Anubis8754%0.9914.8
Nuke5560%1.0014.6
Cache3644%0.9313.4
Train2646%1.2014.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.4%Spray accuracy
70.2%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
621msReaction time
33.4%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
7.92HE damage / grenade
4.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4344 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.3991% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient15–15-0.0415%27 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0323%23 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0628%23 Aug
cache4–13-0.1110%9 Aug
cache13–10-0.0429%9 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0513%8 Aug
dust28–13-0.0622%8 Aug
dust213–8-0.0332%7 Aug
dust210–13-0.0626%6 Aug
cache13–11-0.0427%5 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0327%4 Aug
cache12–16-0.0114%2 Aug
cache13–9-0.069%2 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0326%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0850%1 Aug
dust27–13-0.1225%1 Aug
dust211–13-0.0039%1 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0018%1 Aug
cache16–13-0.0214%31 Jul
dust21–8-0.0433%31 Jul
cache11–13-0.0816%30 Jul
mirage13–30.0338%27 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0319%27 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0615%26 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0527%24 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0513%21 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0314%20 Jul
ancient9–130.0134%20 Jul
inferno4–9-0.1722%18 Jul
inferno9–60.0226%18 Jul
inferno9–6-0.0617%18 Jul
inferno9–2-0.0213%18 Jul
debris9–70.0341%18 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0322%17 Jul
dust216–14-0.0126%17 Jul
mirage16–140.0523%15 Jul
cache13–110.0414%14 Jul
mirage13–50.0836%14 Jul
ancient13–90.0416%13 Jul
cache13–10.0922%13 Jul
dust213–11-0.0135%12 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0421%12 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0123%12 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0412%11 Jul
ancient0–50.0140%11 Jul
mirage15–150.0432%11 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0427%11 Jul
dust213–11-0.0221%11 Jul
ancient13–110.0427%11 Jul
dust213–80.0210%10 Jul
ancient13–60.0210%10 Jul
inferno13–40.027%10 Jul
ancient13–80.0717%10 Jul
ancient13–90.0321%7 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0229%7 Jul
cache13–9-0.0426%6 Jul
mirage16–130.0017%6 Jul
cache10–13-0.0322%5 Jul
ancient13–60.0214%5 Jul
overpass13–9-0.0218%3 Jul
cache13–7-0.0821%3 Jul
cache13–3-0.0413%3 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0336%3 Jul
dust213–9-0.0237%2 Jul
cache13–60.0115%2 Jul
inferno20–22-0.0216%29 Jun
dust215–190.0130%29 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0821%27 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0123%27 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0815%27 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0313%23 Jun
dust213–40.0126%23 Jun
cache9–130.1017%23 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0610%21 Jun
ancient13–100.019%21 Jun
ancient12–12-0.0327%16 Jun
nuke15–150.0018%15 Jun
mirage13–70.0317%15 Jun
mirage13–50.0217%14 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0128%14 Jun
overpass16–19-0.0619%12 Jun
mirage22–19-0.0220%8 Jun
cache11–13-0.028%5 Jun
ancient16–140.0116%5 Jun
ancient13–10.149%4 Jun
cache11–13-0.0517%4 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0317%4 Jun
mirage13–90.0224%4 Jun
cache13–60.0234%4 Jun
inferno13–90.0034%3 Jun
dust210–13-0.0533%3 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0224%3 Jun
ancient16–12-0.0514%2 Jun
anubis2–13-0.1115%2 Jun
ancient11–130.0127%31 May
cache9–130.0017%31 May
inferno13–110.0217%31 May
inferno13–110.0314%31 May
cache8–13-0.0627%29 May
dust24–13-0.0737%29 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →