omar.ozdermir2013@gmail.com

omar.ozdermir2013@gmail.com — CS2 Stats

AL76561198807765106[U:1:847499378]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,324Tracked matches36%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,080Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating20,269Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#80412 of 261577 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 20,269 → 20,269
+2Tracked matches · now 1,324
0.0ppWin rate · 35.7% → 35.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,269 +3,274 28 Jun – 11 Nov · 27 days played
16,87124,066peak 24,06628 Jun11 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,173 +0 5 Sept – 14 Sept · 3 observations
1,1731,173peak 1,1735 Sept14 Sept
24,066Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,173Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-06-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,797 below peak (24,066)
  • -1,995 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,731 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate45.7%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy7.6%12.0%12.4%4.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.231.021.03above
Match win rate45.8%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGomar.ozdermir2013@gmail.c…FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER20,269 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,173csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning55
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–52–6Last 10042%Win rateLLLLLWLTWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −3ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 10

  • 2–6–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 20

  • 4–14–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility6.3
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch6.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.5
Utility6.3
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact0.2

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time548ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 19 Jul →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · shelter, 9 Jul →
383msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · shelter, 9 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · boulder, 13 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L5Current streak
3–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

boulderBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC166–1038%0.00
dust2D134–931%0.01
infernoA117–464%0.05
cacheD113–827%0.04
anubisD102–820%0.02
nukeS96–367%0.03
ancientC83–538%0.02
officeC73–443%0.08
boulderS54–180%0.11
vertigo—31–233%0.02
train—20–20%0.03
fachwerk—21–150%-0.02
overpass—10–10%0.08
debris—11–0100%0.10
shelter—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,987Lifetime kills
1.23K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
2,658Matches
45.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
45.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
7.6%Shot accuracy
5,529MVPs
960Hours (in match)
2,967Bombs planted
1,092Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,614
AWP3,498
MP92,683
MAC-101,623
FAMAS1,059

Lifetime map wins

3,230nuke
3,086inferno
2,223vertigo
1,480dust2
594train
312office
70italy
54bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

50Matches
54%Win rate
1.46Avg K/D
82.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

53%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1856%1.6112.2
Dust2850%1.2614.3
Ancient729%1.3417.7
Nuke5100%1.6319.0
Inferno520%1.5717.6
Anubis475%1.0716.8
Vertigo367%1.4113.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
71.1%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
547msReaction time
39.5%T opening success
33.9%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
12.80HE damage / grenade
8.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.5082% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass9–130.0818%11 Nov →
anubis3–130.0515%11 Nov →
inferno9–130.0920%7 Nov →
dust25–130.0111%4 Nov →
mirage10–130.0416%4 Nov →
dust216–120.0727%29 Oct →
mirage10–130.0212%29 Oct →
office12–120.1118%28 Oct →
office13–100.0615%28 Oct →
cache12–120.0614%25 Oct →
boulder13–70.1219%30 Sept →
train9–130.0625%30 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0417%30 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0713%28 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0612%28 Sept →
nuke13–30.0115%27 Sept →
boulder5–130.0614%27 Sept →
anubis4–8-0.0711%26 Sept →
nuke7–130.0518%26 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0010%26 Sept →
dust211–13-0.067%26 Sept →
vertigo7–130.0719%23 Sept →
anubis13–110.0818%23 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0316%23 Sept →
dust25–130.0316%23 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.064%20 Sept →
debris9–50.1016%16 Sept →
fachwerk13–70.0221%16 Sept →
boulder13–50.1126%16 Sept →
nuke11–130.0410%15 Sept →
boulder13–00.0742%13 Sept →
office8–130.0123%13 Sept →
dust24–13-0.1229%13 Sept →
fachwerk10–13-0.0610%9 Sept →
boulder13–40.1742%9 Sept →
inferno13–100.068%4 Sept →
mirage11–130.0111%4 Sept →
office13–60.1323%2 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0116%28 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0111%28 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0024%27 Aug →
cache11–130.1531%26 Aug →
inferno13–90.0621%21 Aug →
inferno13–90.0619%19 Aug →
cache13–80.1312%19 Aug →
train6–130.0016%12 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0124%11 Aug →
ancient8–130.0014%11 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0433%6 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0137%5 Aug →
anubis4–130.0215%5 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.107%5 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0210%3 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0110%3 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0219%2 Aug →
mirage8–130.0011%2 Aug →
ancient10–130.0512%2 Aug →
anubis5–130.0326%30 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0118%30 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0415%30 Jul →
dust27–130.0217%30 Jul →
mirage16–130.0223%29 Jul →
inferno13–100.0014%29 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0018%29 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0018%29 Jul →
ancient13–100.0911%29 Jul →
mirage13–70.0615%29 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0628%29 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.037%29 Jul →
inferno13–20.0732%29 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.055%29 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0010%29 Jul →
ancient13–30.0717%29 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0212%28 Jul →
inferno4–130.1017%28 Jul →
mirage15–150.0714%28 Jul →
inferno13–70.068%27 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0012%27 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0215%24 Jul →
mirage13–50.1013%22 Jul →
nuke13–90.0924%22 Jul →
mirage13–90.0314%21 Jul →
inferno13–60.0215%21 Jul →
anubis15–150.099%20 Jul →
cache13–40.0928%20 Jul →
dust213–10.2822%19 Jul →
nuke13–10.0620%19 Jul →
office13–30.1726%13 Jul →
office9–130.0330%13 Jul →
office10–130.0614%9 Jul →
shelter13–60.0760%9 Jul →
nuke5–130.0919%9 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0819%9 Jul →
cache7–130.0518%5 Jul →
dust212–120.0919%1 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0514%1 Jul →
vertigo12–12-0.029%1 Jul →
cache9–130.0720%1 Jul →
inferno7–130.0611%30 Jun →
anubis16–14-0.0015%28 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.