Ness

Ness — CS2 Stats

NO76561198803456767[U:1:843191039]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,080Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,314Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,887Top 5% of 200,629 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6460 of 247554 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,136 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 26,887 → 26,887
0Faceit ELO · 2,136 → 2,136
+2Tracked matches · now 3,080
0.0ppWin rate · 60.7% → 60.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,887 +812 24 Jul – 9 Sept · 21 days played
25,73627,113peak 27,11324 Jul9 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,136 +0 30 Aug – 9 Sept · 4 observations
2,1362,136peak 2,13630 Aug9 Sept
27,113Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,136Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-07-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,136
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 364 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 226 below peak (27,113)
  • +377 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,113 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches9——
Win rate44%——
K/D1.16——
Headshot %51%——

Measured 30 Aug 2026 → 28 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,726), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.9%46.8%48.2%2.3% short
Shot accuracy14.2%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.061.070.11 short
Match win rate45.0%46.3%46.9%1.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNessFACEITLevel 8 · 2,136 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER26,887 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,136csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning60
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateLLLWWWTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +54ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.9
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning6.0
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time537ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 27 Jul →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 4–7 · mirage, 7 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 25 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 29 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 59% over 22mirageWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2213–959%0.02
mirageD186–1233%0.00
ancientC187–1139%0.02
cacheB157–847%-0.01
anubisC114–736%0.03
dust2A116–555%0.02
overpass—32–167%0.01
nuke—22–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

171,519Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
6,511Matches
45.0%Match win rate
45.9%Headshot %
14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
15,105MVPs
4,314Hours (in match)
6,439Bombs planted
1,596Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4760,156
AWP21,238
SG 5532,272
FAMAS2,163
MP92,152

Lifetime map wins

17,807inferno
5,326dust2
3,092train
1,305nuke
816vertigo
589cbble
324office
32lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

893Matches
54%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
84.2ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno8358%1.3117.3
Mirage5652%1.2017.2
Ancient5252%1.0916.2
Anubis3653%1.0416.8
Overpass2767%1.3218.9
Dust22129%1.0217.2
Cache1675%1.2318.6
Train683%1.3818.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
532msReaction time
36.6%T opening success
53.1%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
9.21HE damage / grenade
9.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.634% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–70.0444%7 Sept →
ancient1–40.0020%6 Sept →
anubis10–130.0211%6 Sept →
mirage13–80.0720%6 Sept →
dust213–90.0515%3 Sept →
dust213–50.0514%31 Aug →
anubis12–120.0014%30 Aug →
inferno13–110.0012%30 Aug →
mirage13–100.0119%30 Aug →
ancient13–50.018%29 Aug →
dust213–30.0416%29 Aug →
inferno13–10.1324%29 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.069%28 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0210%28 Aug →
dust27–13-0.039%28 Aug →
inferno12–12-0.0125%27 Aug →
overpass13–70.1123%27 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0712%27 Aug →
mirage2–40.0915%27 Aug →
ancient13–100.0622%25 Aug →
inferno13–110.0620%25 Aug →
dust213–100.0617%24 Aug →
inferno13–50.0114%24 Aug →
inferno11–130.0427%21 Aug →
overpass0–6-0.0422%21 Aug →
ancient5–20.0322%21 Aug →
cache0–13-0.090%21 Aug →
dust26–00.1018%21 Aug →
inferno13–20.0215%21 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0111%21 Aug →
ancient9–130.0319%20 Aug →
dust210–130.0616%20 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.0213%20 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0010%19 Aug →
inferno9–130.019%19 Aug →
inferno13–30.0232%19 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0214%18 Aug →
mirage13–60.0531%18 Aug →
mirage13–110.0115%17 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0111%17 Aug →
anubis13–70.0616%17 Aug →
inferno8–130.0513%17 Aug →
cache8–130.0220%17 Aug →
cache19–160.0219%16 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0315%16 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0517%16 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.037%15 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0113%15 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0443%15 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0422%15 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.017%15 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.109%15 Aug →
cache13–40.0114%13 Aug →
inferno13–110.0216%13 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0113%13 Aug →
ancient7–130.0517%13 Aug →
ancient13–100.0919%12 Aug →
mirage13–160.0119%12 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0710%12 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0315%12 Aug →
dust211–130.0216%12 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0315%11 Aug →
cache13–20.0824%11 Aug →
anubis9–30.0919%11 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0023%11 Aug →
ancient13–60.0219%11 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0116%10 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0115%10 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0621%10 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.057%10 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0521%8 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0623%8 Aug →
ancient10–130.0319%8 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0519%29 Jul →
nuke13–60.0616%29 Jul →
ancient0–130.0124%29 Jul →
anubis0–13-0.0710%29 Jul →
inferno13–10.0719%29 Jul →
anubis13–30.1527%27 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0326%27 Jul →
inferno13–80.0918%27 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0021%27 Jul →
cache1–13-0.0229%27 Jul →
ancient10–130.0515%26 Jul →
inferno11–130.0617%26 Jul →
anubis8–130.0613%26 Jul →
ancient10–130.0015%25 Jul →
overpass13–5-0.0512%25 Jul →
inferno13–10.0718%25 Jul →
nuke16–140.0514%25 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0025%25 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0614%25 Jul →
ancient13–80.0228%24 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0915%24 Jul →
cache13–100.0513%24 Jul →
ancient9–130.0214%24 Jul →
anubis12–12-0.0036%24 Jul →
mirage9–30.0112%24 Jul →
mirage10–130.0921%23 Jul →
anubis13–60.0624%23 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.