Oiseth — CS2 Stats

NO76561197987903730[U:1:27638002]Steam profile ↗

1,483Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,086Purple band · top ~24.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#19305 of 33055 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,725 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65

Positioning48

Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateWWWWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5

Aggression5.1

Utility6.6

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels0.8

Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5

Positioning4.8

Utility6.6

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels1.2

Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time582ms−9ms

first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms

Headshot accuracy16.5%−1.4%

first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — ancient 13–1

13–1Biggest win — inferno

5Longest win streak

W4Current streak

4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9mirageWeakest map · 17% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	22	11–11	50%	0.00
inferno	B	19	9–10	47%	-0.01
mirage	D	18	3–15	17%	-0.02
cache	B	14	7–7	50%	-0.00
dust2	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.01
anubis	S	9	7–2	78%	0.02
overpass	S	6	4–2	67%	0.00
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

234Matches

57%Win rate

0.95Avg K/D

72.2ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	47	64%	1.02	14.6
Ancient	38	47%	0.91	13.5
Mirage	33	61%	1.15	13.3
Anubis	19	53%	0.94	15.8
Overpass	15	80%	0.85	13.1
Dust2	11	55%	0.76	14.3
Cache	9	67%	0.75	12.2
Train	6	83%	0.85	13.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy

30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.8%Spray accuracy

82.5%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

577msReaction time

26.7%T opening success

39.5%CT opening success

0.68Enemies flashed / flash

9.1%Flash assists

8.75HE damage / grenade

8.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.7057% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–10	-0.00	15%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.08	23%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	22%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.04	21%	24 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	7%	20 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	13%	20 Aug →
inferno	14–16	-0.00	11%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.02	30%	19 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	7%	13 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	21%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.03	12%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.05	21%	12 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.03	9%	12 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	16%	12 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	30%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	21%	11 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.07	16%	11 Aug →
anubis	9–3	-0.09	16%	11 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.00	10%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.05	10%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	24%	11 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	13%	8 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.13	8%	8 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	10%	8 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.02	22%	8 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.00	19%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–2	-0.05	17%	8 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.08	12%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	11%	31 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.01	19%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.06	28%	29 Jul →
ancient	0–13	-0.10	14%	29 Jul →
anubis	0–13	0.01	24%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.04	21%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.06	15%	27 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.03	15%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.05	21%	27 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	17%	27 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.05	31%	27 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	21%	26 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.01	15%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.02	25%	24 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.01	10%	24 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	8%	24 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	18%	24 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	11%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.03	15%	23 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.07	14%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.02	13%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	9%	23 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.03	30%	23 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	16%	23 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.09	18%	23 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	32%	22 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.03	15%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.05	9%	14 Jul →
overpass	13–10	0.01	19%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.05	12%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.10	18%	12 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.01	20%	12 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.07	23%	12 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.05	12%	6 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	18%	6 Jul →
overpass	13–11	0.02	16%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.06	19%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.05	14%	6 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.08	16%	6 Jul →
overpass	13–5	0.01	22%	4 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.00	31%	4 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.01	17%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.16	35%	4 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.01	10%	4 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.03	31%	4 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	12%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.08	27%	4 Jul →
overpass	13–2	0.00	19%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.17	13%	3 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	14%	3 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.02	23%	3 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	29%	2 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.04	17%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.01	9%	2 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.01	13%	2 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.03	14%	1 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.01	20%	30 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	11%	30 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.10	10%	29 Jun →
overpass	10–13	0.01	13%	29 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	6%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	10%	28 Jun →
ancient	16–13	-0.05	6%	24 Jun →
overpass	10–13	-0.03	20%	21 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.01	17%	21 Jun →
cache	13–11	0.01	16%	19 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.10	18%	19 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.00	19%	19 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.10	18%	19 Jun →
ancient	12–12	0.00	17%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.08	36%	15 Jun →