Aasum

Aasum — CS2 Stats

NO76561197984639583[U:1:24373855]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

973Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,833Top 25% of 200,629 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#43142 of 247554 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,833 +2,828 6 Jul – 26 Sept · 3 days played
20,00522,876peak 22,8766 Jul26 Sept
23,116Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-07-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 43 below peak (22,876)
  • +2,828 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,167 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAasumFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,833 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning51
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateLWLLWWWLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.9
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.4° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.1
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact1.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time535ms−103ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 23 Jul →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · anubis, 26 Sept →
430msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · ancient, 26 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 86% over 7ancientWeakest map · 40% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC208–1240%0.02
infernoB199–1047%0.02
mirageC156–940%0.04
anubisC146–843%0.01
cacheA148–657%0.01
overpassS76–186%0.05
dust2B63–350%0.03
nukeS54–180%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

300Matches
55%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
77.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3256%0.9212.8
Mirage2475%1.1616.8
Ancient2245%1.0914.5
Overpass1173%1.2615.9
Dust21136%0.7814.8
Cache1155%0.9514.2
Anubis1060%1.0714.9
Train2100%1.4424.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
522msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
10.84HE damage / grenade
8.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3213% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient3–13-0.0123%26 Sept →
anubis13–60.1133%26 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0118%26 Sept →
inferno7–130.0412%25 Sept →
nuke13–00.0616%25 Sept →
ancient13–60.0516%25 Sept →
inferno13–90.0715%15 Sept →
dust214–160.0128%14 Sept →
cache13–100.0211%14 Sept →
dust212–120.1120%7 Sept →
ancient1–4-0.0618%6 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.026%6 Sept →
mirage13–80.0330%6 Sept →
inferno14–160.0325%20 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0122%17 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0116%15 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0510%15 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0616%15 Aug →
cache13–40.0925%13 Aug →
inferno13–110.0414%13 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0019%13 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0126%13 Aug →
ancient13–100.0222%12 Aug →
mirage13–160.0420%12 Aug →
cache4–130.0322%12 Aug →
ancient8–130.0417%12 Aug →
dust211–130.0214%12 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0417%11 Aug →
cache7–13-0.028%8 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0324%6 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0722%6 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0013%4 Aug →
cache13–90.0512%4 Aug →
mirage12–120.1616%2 Aug →
mirage13–50.0311%31 Jul →
cache8–130.007%29 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0119%29 Jul →
ancient0–13-0.1110%29 Jul →
anubis0–13-0.1313%29 Jul →
inferno13–1-0.0117%29 Jul →
anubis13–30.0716%27 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0312%27 Jul →
inferno13–80.0113%27 Jul →
mirage10–130.0222%27 Jul →
cache1–13-0.118%27 Jul →
ancient10–130.0819%26 Jul →
inferno11–130.0330%26 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0417%26 Jul →
ancient10–130.0215%25 Jul →
overpass13–50.1219%25 Jul →
inferno13–10.0917%25 Jul →
nuke16–14-0.0012%25 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0118%25 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.1029%25 Jul →
ancient13–80.049%24 Jul →
inferno3–130.0124%24 Jul →
cache13–100.0515%24 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0013%24 Jul →
anubis12–120.0218%24 Jul →
mirage9–30.0222%24 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0310%23 Jul →
anubis13–60.1720%23 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0414%23 Jul →
overpass13–90.1015%23 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0618%23 Jul →
ancient13–70.1923%23 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0515%20 Jul →
cache0–4-0.0533%20 Jul →
inferno16–120.0024%20 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0226%20 Jul →
inferno13–50.1425%14 Jul →
overpass13–100.0215%14 Jul →
ancient13–50.0621%14 Jul →
mirage13–80.026%14 Jul →
anubis13–80.0317%12 Jul →
cache13–110.0424%12 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0812%12 Jul →
inferno11–130.0824%10 Jul →
mirage9–130.1624%10 Jul →
cache13–90.0011%10 Jul →
overpass7–13-0.028%10 Jul →
ancient6–130.0423%10 Jul →
mirage13–20.1528%9 Jul →
inferno13–80.019%9 Jul →
overpass13–50.0215%8 Jul →
cache10–130.0128%8 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0820%8 Jul →
mirage13–40.1521%8 Jul →
mirage12–12-0.0118%6 Jul →
inferno11–130.0612%6 Jul →
overpass13–110.0517%6 Jul →
anubis13–60.0020%6 Jul →
overpass13–50.0615%4 Jul →
nuke13–70.0411%4 Jul →
cache13–70.0625%4 Jul →
ancient13–10.1419%4 Jul →
anubis13–90.0719%4 Jul →
mirage12–120.0113%4 Jul →
inferno9–130.0220%4 Jul →
dust213–30.0731%4 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.