juran2k

juran2k — CS2 Stats

DE76561198802104547[U:1:841838819]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

818Tracked matches31%Win rate2021Tracked since
591Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Oct 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Tracked matches · now 818
−6.9ppWin rate · 37.9% → 31.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,720 +107 2 Sept – 22 Sept · 6 days played
23,52524,121peak 24,1212 Sept22 Sept
24,121Peak Premier in tracked matches
22Days played since 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate57.8%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy7.7%13.2%13.7%6.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.191.071.09above
Match win rate46.0%46.9%48.4%2.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjuran2kFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning75
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateWTLWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · +39ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.10
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.2
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch2.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning7.5
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time533ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 516ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy31.0%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 29.6% → last ⅓ avg 31.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 5–1 · rush_001, 8 Oct →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 5–1 · rush_001, 8 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–6 · inferno, 19 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 17 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
11–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 14anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2815–1354%0.03
ancientB179–853%0.02
infernoS1410–471%0.07
anubisD113–827%0.03
cacheS107–370%0.03
nukeB84–450%0.02
mirageD62–433%0.02
rush_001—43–175%0.08
vertigo—11–0100%-0.00
overpass—10–10%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

30,068Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
1,494Matches
46.0%Match win rate
57.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
7.7%Shot accuracy
4,197MVPs
591Hours (in match)
853Bombs planted
293Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,972dust2
2,180inferno
854nuke
397vertigo
112cbble
63office
51train
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

242Matches
53%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
83.0ADR
61%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust27853%1.1217.6
Ancient4048%1.0818.0
Inferno3266%1.1417.3
Anubis2763%1.2518.9
Mirage2635%1.0715.2
Cache2556%1.3117.7
Nuke1450%1.0114.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.0%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
516msReaction time
55.3%T opening success
56.4%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
8.11HE damage / grenade
7.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4819 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–40.1125%16 Oct →
mirage12–120.0626%16 Oct →
inferno8–130.1246%16 Oct →
nuke13–60.1537%16 Oct →
inferno13–60.0921%15 Oct →
cache11–130.0015%14 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0220%14 Oct →
ancient8–130.0128%14 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0128%14 Oct →
cache19–170.0324%12 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0229%12 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0423%12 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0127%12 Oct →
anubis5–130.0238%9 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.0622%9 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0429%9 Oct →
inferno13–50.0320%9 Oct →
ancient13–60.0135%9 Oct →
ancient13–100.0332%8 Oct →
cache25–230.0232%8 Oct →
dust22–130.0657%8 Oct →
rush_0012–6-0.0850%8 Oct →
rush_0018–60.1040%8 Oct →
rush_0015–10.0267%8 Oct →
rush_0015–10.2836%8 Oct →
inferno9–70.1937%8 Oct →
anubis13–160.0127%6 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0024%6 Oct →
nuke11–130.0336%6 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0122%6 Oct →
inferno4–130.0217%5 Oct →
dust213–110.0116%5 Oct →
mirage11–130.0137%28 Sept →
ancient11–130.0721%28 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0434%28 Sept →
dust216–140.0426%25 Sept →
inferno19–160.0138%25 Sept →
inferno13–60.0729%25 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0220%25 Sept →
dust213–70.0223%25 Sept →
mirage13–90.1218%24 Sept →
anubis12–120.0529%24 Sept →
dust213–50.0314%24 Sept →
inferno9–130.0443%24 Sept →
dust213–50.0024%23 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0034%23 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0133%23 Sept →
cache13–80.0824%22 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0217%22 Sept →
dust212–120.0234%22 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0425%22 Sept →
dust210–130.0326%21 Sept →
mirage5–12-0.0613%21 Sept →
dust213–70.0136%21 Sept →
cache13–80.0128%21 Sept →
vertigo13–6-0.0041%20 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0136%20 Sept →
anubis13–80.0923%20 Sept →
ancient13–110.1032%20 Sept →
nuke13–40.0233%19 Sept →
dust24–130.1134%19 Sept →
dust213–80.1433%19 Sept →
anubis13–60.0627%19 Sept →
cache13–70.1541%19 Sept →
nuke13–110.0524%19 Sept →
ancient13–100.0138%19 Sept →
overpass6–90.0014%19 Sept →
nuke6–9-0.0319%19 Sept →
inferno9–60.0730%19 Sept →
dust213–100.0527%19 Sept →
nuke13–70.0418%19 Sept →
ancient13–40.0337%18 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0145%18 Sept →
cache13–60.0932%18 Sept →
dust213–80.0721%18 Sept →
inferno13–80.0935%18 Sept →
ancient10–130.0031%18 Sept →
inferno13–80.0433%18 Sept →
cache13–110.0019%18 Sept →
ancient13–110.0531%17 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0931%17 Sept →
dust27–2-0.0245%17 Sept →
dust213–20.0939%17 Sept →
dust214–160.0741%16 Sept →
mirage13–50.0422%16 Sept →
dust25–130.0440%16 Sept →
anubis5–130.1638%16 Sept →
ancient13–100.0428%16 Sept →
ancient9–130.0534%16 Sept →
inferno8–130.0844%16 Sept →
ancient13–70.0517%15 Sept →
dust213–40.0724%15 Sept →
inferno13–60.0436%15 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0429%15 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0116%14 Sept →
inferno13–100.0823%14 Sept →
dust211–130.0616%14 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0420%14 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0029%14 Sept →
ancient12–160.0525%13 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.