Yuuya Nakano

Yuuya Nakano — CS2 Stats

DE76561198799540021[U:1:839274293]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

193Tracked matches66%Win rate2021Tracked since
593Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating17,984Purple band · top ~16.5% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 193 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,984 +2,267 2 Nov – 5 Oct · 22 days played
15,00018,311peak 18,3112 Nov5 Oct
18,311Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2025-10-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 327 below peak (18,311)
  • +634 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,016 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-05
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate36.9%44.3%46.9%10.0% short
Shot accuracy19.3%11.9%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.011.031.080.07 short
Match win rate44.5%45.2%46.7%2.2% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGYuuya NakanoPREMIER17,984 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning54
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateLWTWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+4.4 against its own average).

Aim9.5
Utility3.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch10.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning5.4
Utility3.6
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time538ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–0 · mirage, 29 Aug →
62%Best headshot accuracy · 4–1 · nuke, 15 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 18 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 29 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 82% over 11anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2310–1343%-0.00
dust2S2015–575%0.02
infernoD155–1033%-0.00
nukeC146–843%0.01
cacheS119–282%0.05
ancientC94–544%0.03
anubisD51–420%-0.02
overpass—22–0100%0.02
shelter—11–0100%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,767Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
931Matches
44.5%Match win rate
36.9%Headshot %
19.3%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Purple band
1,975MVPs
327Hours (in match)
422Bombs planted
182Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,548dust2
1,504inferno
813nuke
372vertigo
180office
47cbble
22lake
18train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

16Matches
56%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
100.6ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23100%1.2420.7
Mirage10%1.0017.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
44.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.1%Spray accuracy
88.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
538msReaction time
41.3%T opening success
47.6%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
7.53HE damage / grenade
4.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke5–13-0.0626%24 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0221%23 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0220%23 Sept →
mirage13–10.0135%23 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0218%23 Sept →
dust213–80.0236%23 Sept →
anubis8–130.0133%22 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0021%22 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0528%6 Sept →
mirage13–70.0422%6 Sept →
inferno13–30.0320%6 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0221%6 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0221%1 Sept →
nuke9–130.0233%31 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0040%30 Aug →
dust213–60.0322%30 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0130%30 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0118%30 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0129%30 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0318%30 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.095%29 Aug →
dust213–2-0.0119%29 Aug →
mirage13–00.1618%29 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.089%29 Aug →
dust213–100.0329%23 Aug →
mirage13–40.0917%23 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0227%23 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0518%22 Aug →
ancient13–90.0317%22 Aug →
dust213–110.0024%22 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0120%21 Aug →
cache13–110.0923%21 Aug →
cache13–80.1016%21 Aug →
cache13–70.0734%21 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0328%21 Aug →
mirage5–130.0119%21 Aug →
mirage13–50.0116%21 Aug →
inferno5–130.0624%21 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0113%20 Aug →
ancient9–130.0717%20 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0215%20 Aug →
mirage13–110.1619%20 Aug →
dust213–60.1215%20 Aug →
cache8–10.0936%20 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0520%20 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0022%20 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0340%20 Aug →
nuke13–2-0.0535%19 Aug →
inferno13–40.0413%19 Aug →
cache11–130.0213%19 Aug →
dust213–70.0923%19 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0616%19 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0813%18 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0744%18 Aug →
cache13–30.0716%18 Aug →
ancient5–130.0118%18 Aug →
nuke13–90.0417%18 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0123%18 Aug →
inferno7–130.0727%18 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0129%18 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0124%18 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0116%18 Aug →
mirage13–100.0421%17 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0725%17 Aug →
nuke0–13-0.0517%17 Aug →
dust213–20.0139%17 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0326%16 Aug →
nuke11–130.0923%16 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0124%16 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0215%16 Aug →
nuke6–3-0.0546%16 Aug →
mirage13–80.0217%16 Aug →
anubis3–130.0032%15 Aug →
cache13–90.1637%15 Aug →
nuke3–130.0629%15 Aug →
nuke4–10.0662%15 Aug →
shelter13–00.1527%15 Aug →
dust213–90.1125%15 Aug →
inferno13–80.0120%15 Aug →
dust216–120.0424%15 Aug →
nuke13–50.1022%14 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0222%14 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0216%14 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0425%11 Nov →
dust213–60.0122%10 Nov →
dust214–160.0419%9 Nov →
overpass16–140.0214%9 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0114%9 Nov →
ancient13–90.063%8 Nov →
nuke13–100.0710%8 Nov →
nuke4–13-0.0824%5 Nov →
ancient13–20.0817%5 Nov →
mirage12–16-0.0229%5 Nov →
ancient4–13-0.0031%4 Nov →
overpass13–30.0115%2 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0423%1 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0618%31 Oct →
ancient13–60.0532%31 Oct →
nuke8–130.0322%31 Oct →
dust213–110.0015%31 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.