GiveawaySign In
๐”๐”ฆ๐”ฉ๐”ฌ

๐”๐”ฆ๐”ฉ๐”ฌ โ€” CS2 Stats

AO76561198769772041[U:1:809506313]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

374Tracked matches50%Win rate2026Tracked since
669Hours in CS56Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,137Blue band ยท top ~33% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#158927 of 261701 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,137 +1,598 23 Jul โ€“ 13 Nov ยท 46 days played
12,34917,963peak 17,96323 Jul13 Nov
18,201Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,251Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-07-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,826 below peak (17,963)
  • -389 over 30 days ยท steady
  • -2,481 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 โ€” 863 to go
  • Reached: Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played โ€” but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,631), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.7%43.8%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.791.021.030.24 short
Match win rate49.1%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐”๐”ฆ๐”ฉ๐”ฌFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,137 ยท Blue bandPEAK ELO1,251csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning43
Utility44

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54โ€“41โ€“5Last 10054%Win rateLWLWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate ยท +0.02 avg rating ยท +0.9pp headshot accuracy ยท โˆ’34ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” within the normal variation of a 10-match window (ยฑ20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2โ€“3 ยท 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 10

  • 5โ€“5 ยท 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 10โ€“9โ€“1 ยท 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support โ€” Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility4.4
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning4.3
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02โˆ’0.01
first โ…“ avg -0.02 โ†’ last โ…“ avg -0.02
Reaction time583msโˆ’86ms
first โ…“ avg 668ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%+0.7%
first โ…“ avg 17.7% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating ยท 13โ€“7 ยท dust2, 13 Aug โ†’
67%Best headshot accuracy ยท 1โ€“13 ยท cache, 5 Oct โ†’
398msFastest reaction time ยท 0โ€“13 ยท mirage, 4 Nov โ†’
13โ€“2Biggest win ยท ancient, 9 Aug โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
13โ€“7In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map ยท 80% over 5dust2Weakest map ยท 50% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3116โ€“1552%-0.03
dust2B2211โ€“1150%-0.02
ancientB158โ€“753%-0.03
anubisA116โ€“555%-0.00
infernoA95โ€“456%-0.00
cacheA74โ€“357%-0.03
nukeS54โ€“180%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,509Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
924Matches
49.1%Match win rate ยท Top 25% of Level 5 players
44.7%Headshot % ยท Top 50% of Level 5 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,799MVPs
503Hours (in match)
1,081Bombs planted
204Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-474,542
M4A4 / M4A1-S3,110
AWP1,526
Desert Eagle1,049
MP71,041
P2000 / USP-S763
Glock-18518
SSG 08299
MAC-10214
HE Grenade194

Lifetime map wins

2,751dust2
654inferno
431nuke
13vertigo
1train

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

181Matches
50%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
72.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7146%0.9315.2
Dust24245%0.7612.8
Anubis2446%0.8412.3
Ancient2259%0.9213.1
Cache1155%0.8213.4
Inferno786%0.9815.7
Nuke333%0.9311.3
Vertigo1100%0.7110.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
74.1%Counter-strafing
8.9ยฐPreaim
585msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
38.7%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
0.8%Flash assists
10.00HE damage / grenade
4.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7657% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9โ€“130.0232%13 Nov โ†’
nuke16โ€“120.0315%11 Nov โ†’
mirage12โ€“16-0.0220%11 Nov โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0428%7 Nov โ†’
mirage3โ€“13-0.0517%6 Nov โ†’
ancient10โ€“13-0.0615%5 Nov โ†’
anubis13โ€“6-0.028%4 Nov โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.0216%4 Nov โ†’
mirage0โ€“13-0.0817%4 Nov โ†’
ancient13โ€“10-0.0219%30 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.0118%29 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“10-0.106%7 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0413%7 Oct โ†’
mirage20โ€“22-0.0416%6 Oct โ†’
ancient13โ€“16-0.0111%5 Oct โ†’
cache1โ€“13-0.0567%5 Oct โ†’
anubis9โ€“13-0.0418%5 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.0213%4 Oct โ†’
mirage19โ€“16-0.0610%26 Sept โ†’
ancient15โ€“15-0.067%21 Sept โ†’
dust222โ€“190.0215%16 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“50.0518%14 Sept โ†’
mirage15โ€“15-0.0413%13 Sept โ†’
dust27โ€“13-0.0318%13 Sept โ†’
cache10โ€“130.0322%11 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“4-0.0226%10 Sept โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0733%3 Sept โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.0714%3 Sept โ†’
mirage16โ€“14-0.0213%1 Sept โ†’
dust25โ€“13-0.0813%31 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“5-0.0219%30 Aug โ†’
inferno10โ€“13-0.0122%30 Aug โ†’
inferno11โ€“130.0115%19 Aug โ†’
anubis15โ€“150.0715%18 Aug โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0315%18 Aug โ†’
ancient10โ€“13-0.0910%18 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“30.0221%17 Aug โ†’
ancient10โ€“13-0.0011%16 Aug โ†’
dust29โ€“13-0.0426%15 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“8-0.0217%15 Aug โ†’
mirage14โ€“160.0222%15 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“9-0.1111%15 Aug โ†’
mirage14โ€“16-0.0626%15 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“8-0.0419%15 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“50.0032%15 Aug โ†’
dust29โ€“13-0.0514%15 Aug โ†’
mirage15โ€“15-0.083%14 Aug โ†’
anubis8โ€“13-0.0112%14 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“70.1017%13 Aug โ†’
mirage4โ€“130.0318%13 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“110.018%12 Aug โ†’
mirage4โ€“13-0.0310%12 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“4-0.0010%12 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“10-0.0411%11 Aug โ†’
nuke6โ€“13-0.0221%11 Aug โ†’
dust27โ€“13-0.0822%11 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“2-0.0417%9 Aug โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.067%9 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“60.0724%9 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“11-0.0224%9 Aug โ†’
anubis8โ€“13-0.0314%8 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“8-0.067%8 Aug โ†’
cache13โ€“110.0116%7 Aug โ†’
dust29โ€“13-0.0511%7 Aug โ†’
mirage16โ€“13-0.018%7 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“11-0.0422%6 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“4-0.0820%6 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“90.009%5 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“11-0.059%5 Aug โ†’
dust210โ€“13-0.0222%4 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0533%4 Aug โ†’
dust23โ€“13-0.0424%4 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“13-0.0626%3 Aug โ†’
dust215โ€“15-0.0229%3 Aug โ†’
ancient9โ€“130.0017%3 Aug โ†’
ancient3โ€“0-0.0140%3 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.0417%3 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“11-0.0223%2 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“11-0.0417%2 Aug โ†’
cache1โ€“13-0.0932%2 Aug โ†’
dust25โ€“13-0.0710%2 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“80.026%1 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“5-0.0516%1 Aug โ†’
dust21โ€“80.0125%31 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.0224%31 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“9-0.037%30 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“100.0517%30 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“11-0.0425%29 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“9-0.0222%29 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“70.0927%28 Jul โ†’
anubis11โ€“13-0.0416%28 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“20.068%27 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“7-0.039%27 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.0120%25 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.0220%25 Jul โ†’
inferno6โ€“13-0.027%25 Jul โ†’
dust213โ€“11-0.054%24 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“11-0.0416%23 Jul โ†’
ancient2โ€“7-0.034%23 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“8-0.066%23 Jul โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.

Explore CSDB.gg

Related

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other gameseDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPIcm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turnResolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutionsCrosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

CS2 Skin WordleName the skin from an extreme close-upModel AccuracyPrediction model accuracy statsTeam Head-to-HeadCompare pro team stats

Learn & Explore

CS2 vs Rainbow Six SiegeDestructibility and operators vs pure utilityCS2 Player Roles ExplainedEntry, support, AWPer, lurker, IGLCS2 Fixes & TroubleshootingStep-by-step fixes for every common CS2 problem