bluepill

bluepill — CS2 Stats

DE76561198757143239[U:1:796877511]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

751Tracked matches41%Win rate2026Tracked since
832Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Oct 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+2Tracked matches · now 751
+2.1ppWin rate · 39.3% → 41.4%

Rating over time

36Days played since 2026-07-16

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches33——
Win rate33%——
K/D1.06——
Headshot %70%——

Measured 19 Sep 2026 → 16 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,250), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate68.8%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.2%11.3%11.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.410.980.99above
Match win rate42.3%43.3%43.9%1.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbluepillFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning54
Utility13

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–47–10Last 10043%Win rateLWWWWWTTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 806ms

Last 10

  • 6–2–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 735ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 732ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility1.3
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch1.6

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 711ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.4
Utility1.3
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time714ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 696ms → last ⅓ avg 714ms
Headshot accuracy29.2%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 29.1% → last ⅓ avg 29.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 26 Jul →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · vertigo, 28 Jul →
500msFastest reaction time · 8–8 · inferno, 24 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
3–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 38% over 42
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC4216–2638%0.01
infernoC2410–1442%0.01
ancientA116–555%-0.02
mirageS75–271%0.00
trainA53–260%0.05
dust2—21–150%-0.06
vertigo—21–150%-0.02
office—20–20%-0.02
overpass—21–150%0.02
nuke—10–10%-0.02
eldorado—10–10%0.01
debris—10–10%-0.18

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 42). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,497Lifetime kills
1.41K/D · Top 5% of Level 3 players
818Matches
42.3%Match win rate
68.8%Headshot % · Top 1% of Level 3 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,145MVPs
348Hours (in match)
353Bombs planted
151Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,163inferno
769dust2
578nuke
288vertigo
129train
17italy
12assault
12office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

115Matches
42%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
77.1ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3148%0.9715.3
Dust22646%1.0815.1
Anubis1947%0.9617.2
Inferno1315%0.6811.8
Ancient911%0.6511.9
Nuke862%1.2717.3
Cache743%0.9114.9
Overpass1100%0.9110.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.6%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.5%Spray accuracy
90.4%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
711msReaction time
42.5%T opening success
55.4%CT opening success
0.23Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
3.31HE damage / grenade
3.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 711.1081ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2294 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 42 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–130.0528%6 Oct →
anubis13–40.0448%6 Oct →
mirage13–1-0.0726%1 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0213%29 Sept →
anubis13–00.0541%29 Sept →
anubis13–60.0716%26 Sept →
inferno8–80.0514%25 Sept →
inferno8–80.0136%24 Aug →
inferno13–60.0737%22 Aug →
anubis5–130.0038%22 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0221%19 Aug →
anubis3–130.0718%15 Aug →
anubis11–130.0530%13 Aug →
anubis13–60.0333%13 Aug →
anubis9–130.0631%12 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0930%11 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0039%10 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0222%9 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0730%9 Aug →
anubis13–30.0737%9 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0129%7 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0215%6 Aug →
ancient8–130.0227%6 Aug →
anubis9–130.0138%6 Aug →
anubis10–130.0133%6 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0342%5 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0750%5 Aug →
anubis12–12-0.0236%4 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0515%4 Aug →
vertigo6–13-0.076%4 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0832%4 Aug →
anubis13–90.0932%4 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0419%3 Aug →
mirage15–150.0426%3 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0650%3 Aug →
mirage13–50.1023%3 Aug →
mirage13–90.0419%3 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0919%2 Aug →
inferno9–4-0.0813%2 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0110%2 Aug →
anubis13–50.0829%2 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0542%2 Aug →
anubis8–130.0127%2 Aug →
inferno10–50.0023%2 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0424%31 Jul →
inferno13–90.1331%31 Jul →
inferno7–130.0159%31 Jul →
anubis13–90.0436%31 Jul →
dust21–13-0.110%31 Jul →
anubis6–130.0239%30 Jul →
train13–60.0835%30 Jul →
train13–90.0525%30 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0127%30 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0414%29 Jul →
inferno12–12-0.0418%29 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0643%28 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0519%28 Jul →
vertigo9–00.0367%28 Jul →
nuke8–8-0.0222%28 Jul →
anubis4–130.0536%28 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0522%27 Jul →
anubis13–30.1232%27 Jul →
inferno2–9-0.0419%26 Jul →
inferno9–10.2936%26 Jul →
office9–13-0.0126%26 Jul →
anubis8–130.0526%25 Jul →
anubis13–90.0338%25 Jul →
inferno7–130.0122%25 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0121%25 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0427%24 Jul →
office2–13-0.0337%24 Jul →
inferno8–8-0.1415%24 Jul →
anubis12–12-0.0625%24 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0253%23 Jul →
anubis12–12-0.0828%23 Jul →
ancient13–50.0344%23 Jul →
inferno10–130.0027%22 Jul →
anubis12–12-0.0130%22 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0338%22 Jul →
eldorado5–90.0125%22 Jul →
debris3–9-0.1823%22 Jul →
overpass9–50.0332%22 Jul →
inferno9–40.1338%22 Jul →
anubis9–130.0137%21 Jul →
anubis13–70.0060%21 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0128%21 Jul →
inferno13–60.0221%21 Jul →
inferno13–80.0327%20 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0416%20 Jul →
inferno13–50.0949%20 Jul →
train6–13-0.0230%19 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0217%19 Jul →
train8–130.0718%18 Jul →
ancient13–40.0335%17 Jul →
overpass2–130.0126%17 Jul →
train13–100.0631%17 Jul →
anubis13–60.0215%17 Jul →
ancient6–130.0326%17 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0319%17 Jul →
inferno4–130.0220%16 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.