Coffee

Coffee — CS2 Stats

76561198755624541[U:1:795358813]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

698Tracked matches56%Win rate2026Tracked since
824Hours in CS177Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,000 +4,529 13 Oct – 26 Oct · 12 days played
9,63215,804peak 15,80413 Oct26 Oct
15,804Peak Premier in tracked matches
18Days played since 2026-10-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 804 below peak (15,804)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate58.8%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy0.0%13.2%13.7%13.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.181.071.09above
Match win rate53.6%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCoffeeFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning59
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–34–7Last 10059%Win rateWLWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 41%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 20

  • 9–8–3 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility4.0
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 70% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 70% on T to 43% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.9
Utility4.0
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact6.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.07
first ⅓ avg 0.08 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time605ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy27.4%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 26.2% → last ⅓ avg 27.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 11 Oct →
72%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · dust2, 26 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · nuke, 16 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 15 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
9–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 20anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2615–1158%0.05
dust2S2016–480%0.02
nukeB189–950%0.03
ancientS128–467%0.01
cacheC114–736%0.01
anubisD93–633%0.04
inferno—44–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

17,006Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
742Matches
53.6%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 9 players
58.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,930MVPs
370Hours (in match)
371Bombs planted
307Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,278dust2
1,272nuke
219inferno
31vertigo
25office
13italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

646Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
79.5ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20252%1.1215.9
Anubis12444%1.0515.8
Cache8647%1.1816.2
Dust28552%0.9814.7
Nuke6970%1.2316.4
Ancient6850%0.9414.9
Inferno1250%0.9111.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.6%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
603msReaction time
69.8%T opening success
42.5%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
6.43HE damage / grenade
4.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4772 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–30.0823%27 Oct →
dust26–130.0172%26 Oct →
dust213–90.0658%26 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0034%26 Oct →
dust24–70.0818%26 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0319%26 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0312%26 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0418%25 Oct →
dust213–60.0720%25 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0311%25 Oct →
cache4–5-0.0224%24 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0632%24 Oct →
cache7–130.0320%24 Oct →
cache12–120.0537%24 Oct →
cache12–120.0532%24 Oct →
anubis8–130.0624%24 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0520%23 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0326%23 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0623%23 Oct →
nuke13–30.0438%23 Oct →
cache13–90.0318%22 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0331%22 Oct →
mirage13–50.1335%22 Oct →
cache1–13-0.0925%22 Oct →
mirage13–110.0227%22 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0317%22 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.1121%22 Oct →
dust213–110.0030%22 Oct →
mirage13–60.0332%22 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0328%21 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.018%21 Oct →
nuke12–120.0148%21 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.0324%21 Oct →
ancient13–60.0120%21 Oct →
dust213–100.0325%21 Oct →
dust213–5-0.017%20 Oct →
dust213–100.0317%20 Oct →
nuke9–130.0042%20 Oct →
cache13–40.0219%20 Oct →
mirage8–10.1621%20 Oct →
mirage13–70.0523%19 Oct →
ancient5–130.0045%19 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0329%19 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0031%19 Oct →
mirage13–100.0321%19 Oct →
nuke13–100.0234%19 Oct →
anubis2–11-0.0467%19 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0818%19 Oct →
mirage13–40.0423%19 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0421%18 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0618%18 Oct →
ancient13–90.1027%18 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0213%17 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0019%17 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0329%17 Oct →
nuke13–90.0634%17 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0121%16 Oct →
cache4–130.0740%16 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0124%16 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.025%16 Oct →
mirage13–40.0826%16 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0227%16 Oct →
inferno13–90.0829%16 Oct →
mirage11–50.0622%16 Oct →
inferno13–100.0429%15 Oct →
mirage1–130.0219%15 Oct →
dust213–50.0327%15 Oct →
inferno13–110.0222%15 Oct →
mirage9–20.0944%15 Oct →
cache13–20.1433%15 Oct →
inferno13–70.0118%15 Oct →
ancient13–50.0621%15 Oct →
nuke13–50.0837%15 Oct →
mirage13–50.0930%15 Oct →
nuke11–90.0830%15 Oct →
anubis13–90.0522%15 Oct →
dust213–70.0343%15 Oct →
mirage10–130.0122%15 Oct →
dust213–30.0528%14 Oct →
dust213–40.0424%14 Oct →
dust213–80.0320%14 Oct →
ancient7–130.0243%14 Oct →
mirage13–30.2227%14 Oct →
nuke5–10.1326%14 Oct →
mirage15–150.1623%13 Oct →
anubis13–100.1426%13 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0914%13 Oct →
mirage9–130.0923%13 Oct →
mirage13–90.0630%13 Oct →
ancient13–70.1218%13 Oct →
dust213–110.0927%13 Oct →
anubis10–130.0220%12 Oct →
mirage9–130.0224%11 Oct →
mirage13–20.1524%11 Oct →
anubis10–130.1013%11 Oct →
nuke12–30.1530%11 Oct →
nuke13–60.2338%11 Oct →
mirage15–150.0420%11 Oct →
dust213–110.0319%9 Oct →
dust28–130.0225%9 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.