௵﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽﷽ — CS2 Stats
CH76561198725735173[U:1:765469445]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.
Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +9.3pp headshot accuracy · +151ms reaction
Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 3–2 · 60% win rate
- Avg rating 0.07
- Avg headshot accuracy 37%
- Avg reaction 712ms
Last 10
- 5–5 · 50% win rate
- Avg rating 0.02
- Avg headshot accuracy 28%
- Avg reaction 702ms
Last 20
- 10–10 · 50% win rate
- Avg rating 0.00
- Avg headshot accuracy 24%
- Avg reaction 626ms
Newest first, from the last 20 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).
Limited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Reaction time. 631ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 4.2/10 (Developing, provisional — under 30 tracked matches), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 20 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 20 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
Strongest and weakest map need 5+ matches on two different maps — 0 of 9 maps qualify so far.
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | — | 4 | 3–1 | 75% | -0.01 |
| office | — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | 0.01 |
 ancient | — | 3 | 0–3 | 0% | -0.03 |
 inferno | — | 3 | 3–0 | 100% | 0.14 |
 cache | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.02 |
 dust2 | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.17 |
 nuke | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.09 |
| debris | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.15 |
 overpass | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.12 |
Across the last 20 tracked matches.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2187 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.04 | 34% | 21 Sept → | |
| ancient | 3–12 | 0.00 | 28% | 20 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–0 | 0.17 | 89% | 20 Sept → | |
| inferno | 9–7 | 0.17 | 19% | 20 Sept → | |
| office | 13–3 | 0.03 | 16% | 19 Sept → | |
| ancient | 2–13 | -0.09 | 14% | 19 Sept → | |
| nuke | 2–13 | -0.09 | 15% | 19 Sept → | |
| office | 9–6 | -0.00 | 10% | 14 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | -0.05 | 19% | 14 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–6 | 0.05 | 39% | 14 Sept → | |
| debris | 2–9 | -0.15 | 15% | 14 Sept → | |
| ancient | 6–13 | 0.00 | 31% | 13 Sept → | |
| office | 6–1 | 0.03 | 25% | 13 Sept → | |
| office | 3–8 | -0.02 | 16% | 5 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | -0.01 | 17% | 5 Sept → | |
| inferno | 9–2 | 0.13 | 14% | 12 Aug → | |
| overpass | 2–9 | -0.12 | 6% | 12 Aug → | |
| inferno | 9–3 | 0.10 | 24% | 12 Aug → | |
| cache | 1–13 | -0.08 | 25% | 12 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | 0.06 | 19% | 12 Aug → |
Match data via Leetify.
