Kurrygan — CS2 Stats

Compare periods

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Performance scores

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

Map breakdown

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	C	18	7–11	39%	-0.08
office	D	17	5–12	29%	-0.03
dust2	D	12	3–9	25%	-0.03
mirage	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.03
ancient	D	10	3–7	30%	-0.03
vertigo	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.06
cache	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.05
nuke	—	4	1–3	25%	0.01
overpass	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.10
train	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.07
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.10
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.14
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.12
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.05
alpine	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06
warden	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

Milestones