Hunt3r

Hunt3r — CS2 Stats

SV76561198492060246[U:1:531794518]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

567Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,127Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.7 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 2 · 814 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 567 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 24 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,707 -1,183 24 Feb5 Jul · 38 days played
10,00012,084peak 12,08424 Feb5 Jul
Faceit ELO: 814 +0 2 Sept8 Sept · 3 observations
814814peak 8142 Sept8 Sept
12,474Peak Premier in tracked matches
814Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-02-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 814
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 87 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,197), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate33.7%41.3%41.9%8.2% short
Shot accuracy11.2%12.7%12.2%1.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.940.960.980.04 short
Match win rate42.4%42.5%43.3%0.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 3 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHunt3rFACEITLevel 2 · 814 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPEAK ELO814csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning48
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44542Last 10044%Win rateLWWLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · +26ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility5.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning4.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact1.7

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time643ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 686ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–0 · dust2, 16 Mar
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · dust2, 16 Mar
422msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 21 Jun
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 16 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 47% over 19dust2Weakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27121544%0.01
infernoB22101245%0.01
nukeB1991047%0.02
dust2D1551033%0.01
ancientC83538%0.00
cache32167%-0.03
anubis32167%0.04
vertigo21150%-0.02
stronghold1010%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,154Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
3,725Matches
42.4%Match win rate
33.7%Headshot %
11.2%Shot accuracy
7,182MVPs
1,127Hours (in match)
3,038Bombs planted
1,152Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,372
AWP4,579
MP91,984
P901,343
MAC-101,319

Lifetime map wins

4,076inferno
3,421dust2
2,508nuke
1,270vertigo
1,205train
745cbble
428lake
175safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

136Matches
48%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
69.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24146%0.8612.7
Mirage3447%0.9013.3
Anubis1527%0.8012.7
Inferno1479%1.2315.9
Ancient978%1.0312.0
Overpass450%1.4812.5
Nuke425%1.1414.3
Vertigo367%1.5413.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
68.8%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
642msReaction time
25.2%T opening success
43.0%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
5.69HE damage / grenade
10.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.496 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.1816% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–13-0.0019%4 Aug
mirage13–90.0115%4 Aug
inferno13–60.0124%4 Aug
dust25–130.038%28 Jul
nuke9–130.0526%28 Jul
dust22–13-0.0225%28 Jul
cache13–7-0.0313%7 Jul
cache13–10.0113%7 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0013%5 Jul
inferno11–130.0111%5 Jul
ancient13–80.0120%26 Jun
inferno8–130.1011%25 Jun
inferno8–13-0.063%21 Jun
anubis13–90.0519%21 Jun
dust210–130.0028%17 Jun
mirage8–130.0319%17 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0318%10 Jun
dust26–13-0.0527%10 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0211%10 Jun
mirage13–90.0219%5 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0329%5 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0618%2 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0411%23 May
nuke10–13-0.0612%23 May
mirage6–13-0.0327%21 May
dust20–13-0.0336%21 May
ancient8–13-0.0017%20 May
nuke13–20.0715%20 May
mirage13–11-0.0211%20 May
nuke10–13-0.0319%14 May
stronghold5–130.0617%14 May
mirage13–110.0217%13 May
nuke9–13-0.0115%13 May
mirage6–13-0.0310%13 May
dust213–40.019%5 May
cache9–13-0.088%5 May
vertigo9–40.0921%28 Apr
nuke13–60.0515%28 Apr
nuke13–50.0321%26 Apr
inferno13–50.0826%23 Apr
mirage13–30.0621%23 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0120%21 Apr
nuke13–100.0327%21 Apr
mirage16–14-0.0013%16 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0517%13 Apr
dust24–13-0.0217%13 Apr
inferno13–90.0510%13 Apr
inferno9–30.1325%13 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0120%8 Apr
dust213–8-0.0021%8 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0414%8 Apr
anubis15–150.0212%7 Apr
dust26–130.0524%6 Apr
mirage5–130.0118%6 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0321%6 Apr
nuke13–110.1221%30 Mar
inferno3–13-0.044%29 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0014%29 Mar
nuke13–60.0415%29 Mar
mirage13–110.0112%28 Mar
inferno8–130.0618%25 Mar
nuke16–130.0511%23 Mar
inferno9–6-0.187%23 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0412%20 Mar
inferno13–60.045%20 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0220%19 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0029%19 Mar
inferno13–100.0414%19 Mar
mirage13–40.0716%19 Mar
mirage6–130.0218%17 Mar
anubis13–100.0416%17 Mar
nuke5–9-0.0612%17 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0212%16 Mar
dust213–00.1637%16 Mar
nuke10–130.0219%16 Mar
mirage13–90.0514%16 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0016%16 Mar
dust215–150.0616%14 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0110%13 Mar
inferno9–130.0215%13 Mar
nuke13–10.089%13 Mar
nuke13–70.0519%13 Mar
mirage13–160.0318%13 Mar
mirage7–130.028%13 Mar
inferno9–7-0.076%11 Mar
dust211–130.0213%10 Mar
mirage6–130.0612%10 Mar
mirage9–130.0322%10 Mar
dust213–100.0718%9 Mar
ancient13–90.0718%9 Mar
nuke6–9-0.0211%9 Mar
dust213–11-0.0314%3 Mar
nuke4–90.009%26 Feb
mirage0–9-0.0217%26 Feb
nuke7–130.0118%26 Feb
ancient2–9-0.010%24 Feb
dust22–13-0.0316%24 Feb
ancient3–13-0.016%24 Feb
vertigo5–9-0.123%24 Feb
inferno9–10.1313%24 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →