𝕾ą𝖘𝖎𝖆𝖉1910 — CS2 Stats

76561198450815482[U:1:490549754]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,758Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since

2,166Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating19,471Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#88718 of 247913 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,530 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,471 -508 13 Aug – 30 Sept · 23 days played

20,531Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,530Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

28Days played since 2026-08-13

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,530
Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 1 to go
Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

754 below peak (20,225)
+199 over 30 days · steady
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 529 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

Metric	Last 30	Previous 30	Change
Matches	98	—	—
Win rate	51%	—	—
K/D	1.08	—	—
Headshot %	39%	—	—

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,745), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	37.8%	46.8%	48.2%	10.4% short
Shot accuracy	10.6%	13.0%	13.3%	2.7% short
Kill/death ratio	0.97	1.06	1.07	0.10 short
Match win rate	45.3%	46.3%	46.9%	1.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning58

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateWLLWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −43ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 491ms

Last 20

10–9–1 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 513ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.1

Utility4.9

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels1.6

Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning5.8

Utility4.9

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels4.9

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time519ms−16ms

first ⅓ avg 535ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms

Headshot accuracy16.1%+1.8%

first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–8 · ancient, 5 Sept →

28%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · cache, 3 Sept →

359msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 21 Sept →

13–2Biggest win · cache, 5 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak

12–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 62% over 13dust2Weakest map · 31% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	36	18–18	50%	0.01
cache	A	18	10–8	56%	0.01
anubis	A	13	8–5	62%	0.02
dust2	D	13	4–9	31%	0.01
nuke	A	7	4–3	57%	0.04
ancient	D	6	2–4	33%	0.04
inferno	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.01
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

101,601Lifetime kills

0.97K/D

5,614Matches

45.3%Match win rate

37.8%Headshot %

10.6%Shot accuracy

14,334MVPs

2,166Hours (in match)

3,828Bombs planted

1,140Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,147

M4A4 / M4A1-S20,794

AWP13,165

Galil AR7,927

P2000 / USP-S5,680

Desert Eagle5,566

Glock-185,386

FAMAS3,605

MP92,604

P902,534

Lifetime map wins

6,262dust2

2,209inferno

2,161nuke

1,070vertigo

689train

35cbble

18office

17lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

870Matches

49%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

93.5ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

28%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	304	47%	1.21	18.5
Dust2	174	49%	1.18	18.4
Anubis	146	53%	1.17	18.2
Ancient	98	51%	1.18	17.4
Nuke	55	45%	0.93	15.6
Inferno	42	57%	1.10	17.7
Train	23	61%	1.28	17.6
Cache	13	38%	1.21	19.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy

36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.6%Spray accuracy

76.0%Counter-strafing

7.1°Preaim

517msReaction time

62.6%T opening success

36.5%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

4.1%Flash assists

8.16HE damage / grenade

9.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 36.5412% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–6	0.02	14%	30 Sept →
inferno	8–13	0.02	18%	30 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	25%	28 Sept →
anubis	13–11	0.00	15%	28 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.06	10%	28 Sept →
mirage	9–13	0.03	17%	28 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	12%	28 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.02	17%	27 Sept →
dust2	13–10	0.01	17%	26 Sept →
dust2	1–13	-0.10	10%	26 Sept →
mirage	14–16	0.02	22%	26 Sept →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	13%	26 Sept →
inferno	13–11	0.00	12%	26 Sept →
cache	13–6	-0.00	15%	26 Sept →
cache	13–16	-0.03	22%	25 Sept →
anubis	13–5	-0.01	10%	25 Sept →
mirage	16–12	0.08	23%	25 Sept →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	20%	25 Sept →
cache	15–15	-0.05	24%	24 Sept →
nuke	13–9	0.07	18%	24 Sept →
dust2	8–13	0.03	20%	23 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.00	15%	23 Sept →
inferno	7–13	-0.00	16%	23 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.02	16%	23 Sept →
cache	13–8	0.03	19%	23 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.09	21%	21 Sept →
mirage	2–13	-0.13	18%	21 Sept →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	0%	21 Sept →
cache	11–13	0.08	21%	20 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.04	20%	20 Sept →
anubis	13–7	0.06	15%	20 Sept →
mirage	16–14	0.07	8%	14 Sept →
cache	13–5	0.05	10%	14 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.05	18%	14 Sept →
anubis	13–8	0.04	18%	14 Sept →
dust2	13–9	0.06	20%	14 Sept →
nuke	13–6	0.05	23%	14 Sept →
ancient	9–13	0.05	11%	12 Sept →
mirage	15–15	0.07	12%	12 Sept →
mirage	13–3	0.09	16%	12 Sept →
cache	13–7	0.00	10%	12 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	24%	12 Sept →
mirage	16–14	0.06	15%	12 Sept →
dust2	2–13	-0.12	26%	12 Sept →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	11%	11 Sept →
mirage	7–13	0.06	19%	11 Sept →
mirage	10–13	0.06	19%	8 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	8%	5 Sept →
anubis	13–4	0.09	6%	5 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.07	19%	5 Sept →
mirage	8–13	0.02	10%	5 Sept →
cache	13–2	0.05	13%	5 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.10	13%	5 Sept →
ancient	10–13	0.05	15%	5 Sept →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	15%	5 Sept →
cache	13–7	0.01	10%	4 Sept →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	24%	3 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.03	28%	3 Sept →
anubis	10–13	0.01	13%	3 Sept →
mirage	12–16	-0.00	14%	31 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	13%	31 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.05	18%	31 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	11%	31 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	15%	31 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	17%	30 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	19%	30 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.02	12%	30 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	11%	29 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.03	16%	29 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.01	14%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	16%	29 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.03	15%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.03	15%	24 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.03	13%	22 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	9%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.01	20%	22 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	21%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.10	13%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	11%	17 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.02	19%	16 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	0.03	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.07	21%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.09	12%	16 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.05	9%	15 Aug →
cache	16–13	-0.01	22%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	12%	15 Aug →
cache	4–12	-0.01	20%	15 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.05	16%	15 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.03	10%	15 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	19%	14 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.03	11%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.01	14%	14 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	11%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.09	8%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	13%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	9%	14 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.05	11%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–3	-0.00	15%	13 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.01	11%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.06	18%	13 Aug →