𝓛 𝓸 9 𝓶 𝓮 𝓷 — CS2 Stats

TN76561198443138804[U:1:482873076]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,086Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,112Hours in CS35Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating18,514Purple band · top ~14.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#107079 of 261653 tracked

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,072 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,514 +1,525 27 Sept – 14 Nov · 10 days played

Faceit ELO: 1,072 +0 9 Sept – 22 Oct · 5 observations

19,469Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,072Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

36Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,072
0 over 30 days · steady
Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 129 to go
Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
Level 5 first seen 2026-09-09
Level 4 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

955 below peak (19,469)
-630 over 30 days · declining
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,486 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-10-22
Blue band first seen 2026-10-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,631), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	42.4%	43.8%	44.8%	2.4% short
Shot accuracy	9.1%	12.0%	12.4%	3.3% short
Kill/death ratio	0.85	1.02	1.03	0.18 short
Match win rate	41.5%	44.7%	45.2%	3.7% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 6 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42

Positioning47

Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateWWWWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

5–0 · 100% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 12%
Avg reaction 730ms

Last 10

7–3 · 70% win rate
Avg rating -0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 702ms

Last 20

12–8 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 697ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.1 against its own average).

Aim4.2

Utility7.5

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels1.2

Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 58% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 706ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2

Positioning4.7

Utility7.5

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time698ms+4ms

first ⅓ avg 694ms → last ⅓ avg 698ms

Headshot accuracy14.6%−3.6%

first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 14 Nov →

40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 30 Aug →

422msFastest reaction time · 2–6 · inferno, 11 Nov →

13–1Biggest win · anubis, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak

W5Current streak

7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 35% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	22	11–11	50%	-0.00
dust2	C	17	6–11	35%	-0.02
ancient	B	15	8–7	53%	-0.04
cache	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.05
anubis	S	11	8–3	73%	-0.03
mirage	S	10	7–3	70%	-0.02
nuke	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.04
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

95,784Lifetime kills

0.85K/D

6,739Matches

41.5%Match win rate

42.4%Headshot %

9.1%Shot accuracy

11,810MVPs

2,270Hours (in match)

6,155Bombs planted

2,158Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,766

M4A4 / M4A1-S18,818

Desert Eagle6,005

AWP5,607

P2000 / USP-S5,412

Glock-184,381

Galil AR3,178

MP92,744

MAC-102,604

FAMAS1,892

Lifetime map wins

13,655dust2

7,747inferno

2,790vertigo

1,802nuke

1,453train

32office

18cbble

5italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

310Matches

52%Win rate

0.92Avg K/D

72.1ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	75	55%	0.98	14.3
Inferno	59	49%	0.93	13.8
Dust2	55	47%	0.85	13.1
Anubis	43	51%	0.89	13.2
Ancient	42	62%	0.97	14.4
Nuke	11	55%	1.05	14.7
Vertigo	8	62%	1.19	14.3
Overpass	8	38%	0.73	10.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy

32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.0%Spray accuracy

81.5%Counter-strafing

11.9°Preaim

706msReaction time

36.4%T opening success

42.6%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

8.9%Flash assists

10.77HE damage / grenade

12.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.9881% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Best CS2 Settings
Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.
Reaction time 706.0741ms — above the 700ms mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.3636% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–10	-0.02	9%	14 Nov →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	5%	14 Nov →
inferno	13–3	0.10	12%	14 Nov →
mirage	13–4	0.02	14%	14 Nov →
inferno	13–9	0.01	22%	14 Nov →
inferno	9–13	0.01	16%	14 Nov →
ancient	13–9	-0.11	31%	12 Nov →
inferno	10–13	0.02	14%	12 Nov →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	14%	12 Nov →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	36%	12 Nov →
cache	9–13	-0.05	5%	11 Nov →
inferno	2–6	0.01	15%	11 Nov →
nuke	0–13	-0.06	10%	11 Nov →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	13%	11 Nov →
cache	13–11	-0.02	30%	10 Nov →
dust2	13–3	0.02	13%	10 Nov →
ancient	13–8	0.02	13%	9 Nov →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	13%	9 Nov →
anubis	13–11	0.00	9%	9 Nov →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	12%	8 Nov →
cache	9–13	-0.04	18%	8 Nov →
anubis	13–4	-0.03	22%	7 Nov →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	12%	6 Nov →
cache	13–10	-0.05	13%	5 Nov →
ancient	7–3	-0.05	10%	5 Nov →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	16%	4 Nov →
anubis	13–11	-0.06	7%	4 Nov →
cache	4–13	-0.06	14%	4 Nov →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	10%	4 Nov →
inferno	6–13	0.00	17%	17 Oct →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	17%	17 Oct →
ancient	7–13	-0.09	0%	16 Oct →
inferno	13–7	0.01	20%	15 Oct →
anubis	13–11	-0.07	17%	13 Oct →
nuke	8–13	-0.10	8%	12 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.09	21%	12 Oct →
ancient	4–13	-0.11	16%	11 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	5%	10 Oct →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	10%	8 Oct →
inferno	4–13	0.05	8%	8 Oct →
overpass	13–11	0.05	18%	8 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	13%	8 Oct →
inferno	13–2	0.07	14%	6 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	15%	4 Oct →
anubis	2–13	-0.10	13%	4 Oct →
inferno	12–12	-0.01	17%	4 Oct →
mirage	12–12	-0.00	17%	4 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	21%	4 Oct →
anubis	13–11	0.00	13%	29 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.01	20%	29 Sept →
ancient	13–9	0.00	15%	28 Sept →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	18%	27 Sept →
dust2	13–9	0.03	8%	27 Sept →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	11%	27 Sept →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	23%	27 Sept →
anubis	13–1	-0.10	6%	27 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	15%	24 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	10%	23 Sept →
ancient	13–6	-0.05	13%	22 Sept →
ancient	4–13	0.04	15%	22 Sept →
inferno	9–6	0.01	18%	20 Sept →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	15%	20 Sept →
ancient	4–13	-0.03	24%	20 Sept →
nuke	13–3	0.04	27%	20 Sept →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	25%	20 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.05	13%	18 Sept →
dust2	13–6	0.02	8%	18 Sept →
anubis	13–4	0.03	29%	16 Sept →
office	9–13	-0.03	15%	16 Sept →
inferno	9–13	-0.08	16%	16 Sept →
ancient	13–2	0.05	29%	15 Sept →
cache	8–0	-0.02	9%	15 Sept →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	21%	15 Sept →
cache	9–13	-0.06	13%	14 Sept →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	24%	14 Sept →
nuke	13–2	-0.03	33%	13 Sept →
cache	13–11	0.02	21%	13 Sept →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	33%	13 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.01	18%	13 Sept →
dust2	13–4	-0.00	30%	3 Sept →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	11%	3 Sept →
cache	9–13	-0.07	15%	3 Sept →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	15%	1 Sept →
inferno	13–10	-0.04	12%	31 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	13%	31 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.03	14%	31 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.07	16%	31 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.12	14%	31 Aug →
inferno	12–12	-0.02	14%	31 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.08	14%	31 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	18%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	17%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.03	14%	30 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.09	10%	30 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	12%	30 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.12	17%	30 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.02	11%	30 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.04	20%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	40%	30 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.09	16%	30 Aug →