timob0b — CS2 Stats
FI76561198412228562[U:1:451962834]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
What changed since last observed
CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.
CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 59 days played since 21 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.
Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →
Rating over time
Faceit ELO
- At peak — 2,665
- Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 335 to go
- Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
- 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
- Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction
Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 3–2 · 60% win rate
- Avg rating 0.01
- Avg headshot accuracy 22%
- Avg reaction 511ms
Last 10
- 6–4 · 60% win rate
- Avg rating 0.00
- Avg headshot accuracy 19%
- Avg reaction 513ms
Last 20
- 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
- Avg rating 0.00
- Avg headshot accuracy 19%
- Avg reaction 525ms
Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).
Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like s1mple 95% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.
Where you differ: lower positioning profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 cache | A | 37 | 23–14 | 62% | 0.00 |
 mirage | D | 19 | 6–13 | 32% | -0.01 |
 ancient | A | 18 | 10–8 | 56% | -0.00 |
 nuke | S | 9 | 6–3 | 67% | 0.03 |
 dust2 | A | 7 | 4–3 | 57% | -0.01 |
 anubis | D | 5 | 1–4 | 20% | 0.01 |
| office | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.04 |
| boulder | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.04 |
| fachwerk | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.03 |
 inferno | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.05 |
 overpass | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.07 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 782 | 51% | 1.06 | 16.3 |
| Ancient | 492 | 54% | 1.04 | 15.8 |
| Nuke | 251 | 50% | 1.00 | 15.8 |
| Anubis | 149 | 41% | 1.01 | 15.4 |
| Dust2 | 128 | 47% | 0.95 | 14.4 |
| Train | 85 | 56% | 1.02 | 16.5 |
| Overpass | 67 | 49% | 0.96 | 15.3 |
| Inferno | 57 | 46% | 1.08 | 14.8 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.02 | 25% | 22 Sept → | |
| anubis | 7–13 | 0.02 | 23% | 22 Sept → | |
| ancient | 13–6 | -0.02 | 28% | 21 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.01 | 20% | 21 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–10 | 0.00 | 15% | 13 Sept → | |
| mirage | 12–16 | 0.00 | 20% | 9 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–10 | 0.03 | 14% | 9 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–5 | 0.01 | 11% | 7 Sept → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.04 | 24% | 1 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | -0.02 | 14% | 31 Aug → | |
| cache | 12–12 | -0.02 | 25% | 29 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | 0.03 | 19% | 28 Aug → | |
| ancient | 11–13 | 0.06 | 14% | 28 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | -0.01 | 22% | 22 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–5 | 0.03 | 17% | 22 Aug → | |
| anubis | 9–13 | 0.02 | 24% | 21 Aug → | |
| anubis | 7–13 | -0.04 | 14% | 16 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–16 | -0.01 | 21% | 16 Aug → | |
| ancient | 11–13 | -0.04 | 14% | 16 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | 0.00 | 16% | 15 Aug → | |
| cache | 6–13 | -0.08 | 4% | 15 Aug → | |
| mirage | 16–14 | -0.01 | 26% | 11 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–10 | -0.04 | 19% | 24 Jul → | |
| ancient | 16–13 | 0.08 | 27% | 20 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–9 | 0.03 | 27% | 20 Jul → | |
| office | 8–13 | -0.04 | 34% | 19 Jul → | |
| boulder | 8–13 | -0.04 | 11% | 19 Jul → | |
| nuke | 16–12 | -0.00 | 29% | 17 Jul → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | -0.06 | 23% | 12 Jul → | |
| anubis | 10–13 | 0.01 | 48% | 12 Jul → | |
| nuke | 13–5 | -0.01 | 28% | 12 Jul → | |
| ancient | 11–13 | -0.00 | 13% | 12 Jul → | |
| fachwerk | 13–11 | -0.03 | 29% | 10 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–4 | 0.05 | 29% | 9 Jul → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | 0.01 | 25% | 8 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–16 | 0.02 | 13% | 8 Jul → | |
| mirage | 3–13 | -0.08 | 16% | 5 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.06 | 18% | 29 Jun → | |
| cache | 13–11 | 0.05 | 21% | 28 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–5 | -0.00 | 16% | 27 Jun → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | -0.06 | 21% | 27 Jun → | |
| cache | 7–13 | -0.04 | 17% | 27 Jun → | |
| cache | 13–11 | 0.02 | 24% | 26 Jun → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | 0.06 | 15% | 25 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–11 | 0.01 | 24% | 23 Jun → | |
| cache | 12–12 | -0.03 | 52% | 18 Jun → | |
| cache | 12–12 | -0.02 | 14% | 18 Jun → | |
| cache | 13–10 | 0.04 | 23% | 18 Jun → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | 0.08 | 22% | 17 Jun → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | -0.04 | 28% | 16 Jun → | |
| ancient | 13–3 | 0.00 | 23% | 16 Jun → | |
| nuke | 13–5 | 0.12 | 22% | 7 Jun → | |
| mirage | 1–13 | 0.01 | 40% | 5 Jun → | |
| cache | 5–13 | -0.04 | 0% | 3 Jun → | |
| cache | 5–13 | -0.01 | 22% | 31 May → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.04 | 21% | 29 May → | |
| inferno | 5–13 | -0.05 | 33% | 28 May → | |
| cache | 13–6 | 0.01 | 23% | 28 May → | |
| cache | 13–4 | 0.03 | 17% | 25 May → | |
| cache | 12–12 | 0.02 | 16% | 25 May → | |
| cache | 13–10 | 0.08 | 20% | 25 May → | |
| overpass | 2–13 | -0.07 | 19% | 24 May → | |
| cache | 13–7 | -0.05 | 10% | 22 May → | |
| cache | 12–12 | 0.03 | 21% | 21 May → | |
| nuke | 7–13 | 0.04 | 36% | 15 May → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.04 | 19% | 15 May → | |
| cache | 8–13 | 0.02 | 18% | 14 May → | |
| anubis | 13–10 | 0.06 | 20% | 14 May → | |
| ancient | 6–13 | -0.00 | 18% | 13 May → | |
| cache | 13–7 | -0.07 | 22% | 8 May → | |
| cache | 4–13 | 0.04 | 29% | 8 May → | |
| cache | 13–7 | -0.01 | 24% | 8 May → | |
| cache | 10–13 | -0.08 | 18% | 8 May → | |
| ancient | 13–7 | -0.01 | 9% | 7 May → | |
| cache | 13–10 | 0.01 | 14% | 7 May → | |
| cache | 13–6 | -0.02 | 27% | 7 May → | |
| cache | 13–10 | -0.00 | 17% | 7 May → | |
| cache | 9–13 | -0.02 | 33% | 7 May → | |
| cache | 13–11 | -0.04 | 17% | 2 May → | |
| cache | 13–8 | -0.02 | 18% | 1 May → | |
| cache | 13–1 | 0.04 | 28% | 1 May → | |
| cache | 13–2 | 0.07 | 23% | 30 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 3–13 | -0.03 | 30% | 30 Apr → | |
| cache | 13–6 | 0.02 | 26% | 30 Apr → | |
| cache | 13–3 | -0.00 | 42% | 30 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | -0.02 | 12% | 29 Apr → | |
| cache | 4–13 | 0.05 | 23% | 29 Apr → | |
| mirage | 11–13 | -0.03 | 11% | 28 Apr → | |
| ancient | 13–1 | 0.13 | 25% | 27 Apr → | |
| mirage | 2–13 | -0.01 | 28% | 27 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | -0.03 | 32% | 27 Apr → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.03 | 28% | 27 Apr → | |
| ancient | 14–16 | -0.09 | 12% | 26 Apr → | |
| ancient | 13–7 | -0.01 | 24% | 25 Apr → | |
| nuke | 13–4 | 0.07 | 21% | 25 Apr → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.01 | 21% | 25 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.01 | 14% | 24 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 9–13 | -0.07 | 16% | 23 Apr → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.01 | 23% | 22 Apr → | |
| ancient | 13–16 | -0.03 | 23% | 21 Apr → |
Match data via Leetify.
